Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,459

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory

Hopf, Ted·1998·International Security

Abstract

A challenger to the continuing dominance of neorealism and neoliberal institutionalism in the study of international relations in the United States, constructivism is regarded with a great deal of skepticism by mainstream scholars.1 While the reasons for this reception are many, three central ones are the mainstream's miscasting of constructivism as necessarily postmodern and antipositivist; constructivism's own ambivalence about whether it can buy into mainstream social science methods without sacrificing its theoretical distinctiveness; and, related to this ambivalence, constructivism's failure to advance an alternative research program. In this article, I clarify constructivism's claims, outline the differences between conventional and critical constructivism, and suggest a research agenda that both provides alternative understandings of mainstream interna-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/isec.23.1.171

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1017/S0020818300032999 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1017/S0020818300027764 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Doty Roxanne Lynn, 1993, Millennium: Iournal of International Studies, 22, 454
  4. 10.2307/2600589 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Legro Jeffrey W., American Political Science Review, 90, 19961
  6. 10.1086/494362 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1177/03058298880170020901 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.2307/2539078 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hoffman Mark, 1987, Millennium: Iournal of International Studies, 16, 233
  10. Derian James Der, 1987, U.K.: Basil Blackwell, 4
  11. 10.2307/2600809 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1177/03058298910200010812 · doi:10.1177/03058298910200010812
  13. Rosow Stephen J., 1990, Alternafives, 15, 289
  14. 1984, Alternatives, 10, 377
  15. Linklater Andrew, 1992, Millennium: lournal of International Studies, 21, 91
  16. Brown Chris, 1994, Millennium: lournal of International Studies, 23, 219
  17. Ashley Richard K., 1983, Internatioizal Studies Quarterly, 27, 477
  18. 10.2307/2539217 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Biersteker Thomas J., 1989, International Sfudies Quarterly, 33, 266
  20. 10.1017/S002081830002703X · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.2307/2082606 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.2307/2539232 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2307/2600809 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1017/S002081830003335X · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1017/S0043887100008133 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 1,459

Metadata

Authors
Hopf, T.
Venue
International Security
Published
1998-07
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
171-200
ISSN
  • 0162-2889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4804
OpenAlex
W2106260203
Cited by
1,459
References
5
FWCI
163.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/isec.23.1.171
The paper
Hopf, T. (1998). The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory. International Security. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.1.171

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.