The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Testing the Surge: Why Did Violence Decline in Iraq in 2007?
Abstract
Why did violence decline in Iraq in 2007? Many policymakers and scholars credit the “surge,” or the program of U.S. reinforcements and doctrinal changes that began in January 2007. Others cite the voluntary insurgent stand-downs of the Sunni Awakening or say that the violence had simply run its course with the end of a wave of sectarian cleansing; still others credit an interaction between the surge and the Awakening. The difference matters for policy and scholarship, yet this debate has not moved from hypothesis to test. An assessment of the competing claims based on recently declassified data on violence at local levels and information gathered from seventy structured interviews with coalition participants finds little support for the cleansing or Awakening theses. Instead, a synergistic interaction between the surge and the Awakening was required for violence to drop as quickly and widely as it did: both were necessary; neither was sufficient. U.S. policy thus played an important role in reducing the violence in Iraq in 2007, but Iraq provides no evidence that similar methods will produce similar results elsewhere without local equivalents of the Sunni Awakening.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2005) · Cited by 9,479
Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research
King, G., Keohane, R. O., & Verba, S. (1994) · Princeton University Press · doi:10.1515/9781400821211 · Cited by 7,225
The Logic of Violence in Civil War
(2006) · The Logic of Violence in Civil War · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511818462.001 · Cited by 2,402
Blattman, C., & Miguel, E. (2010) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.48.1.3 · Cited by 1,617
Explaining Interethnic Cooperation
Fearon, J. D., & Laitin, D. D. (1996) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2945838 · Cited by 1,606
The security dilemma and ethnic conflict
Posen, B. R. (1993) · Survival · doi:10.1080/00396339308442672 · Cited by 1,420
Possible and Impossible Solutions to Ethnic Civil Wars
Kaufmann, C. (1996) · International Security · doi:10.1162/isec.20.4.136 · Cited by 897
Can Hearts and Minds Be Bought? The Economics of Counterinsurgency in Iraq
Berman, E., Shapiro, J. N., & Felter, J. H. (2011) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/661983 · Cited by 694
Self-citationRage Against the Machines: Explaining Outcomes in Counterinsurgency Wars
Lyall, J., & Wilson, I. (2009) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818309090031 · Cited by 553
Civil wars, insecurity, and intervention
Walter, B. F., & Snyder, J. (1999) · Cited by 393
Cited by
Environmental pressures and pro-government militias: Evidence from the Philippines
Eastin, J., & Zech, S. T. (2023) · Conflict Management and Peace Science · doi:10.1177/07388942221110128 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Biddle, S., Friedman, J. A., & Shapiro, J. N.
- Venue
- International Security
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7-40
- ISSN
- 0162-2889 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4804
- OpenAlex
- W2032591502
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 17
- FWCI
- 99.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Testing the Surge: Why Did Violence Decline in Iraq in 2007? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/isec_a_00087
- The paper
- Biddle, S., Friedman, J. A., & Shapiro, J. N. (2012). Testing the Surge: Why Did Violence Decline in Iraq in 2007? International Security. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00087
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.