Cited by 719Corruption and Economic DevelopmentPoverty, Education, and Child WelfareLocal Government Finance and Decentralization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Fighting Corruption to Improve Schooling: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign in Uganda

Reinikka, Ritva, Svensson, Jakob·2005·Journal of the European Economic Association

Abstract

What are the most effective ways to increase primary school enrollment and student learning? We argue that innovations in governance of social services may yield the highest return since social service delivery in developing countries is often plagued by inefficiencies and corruption. We illustrate this by using data from an unusual policy experiment. A newspaper campaign in Uganda aimed at reducing capture of public funds by providing schools (parents) with information to monitor local officials' handling of a large education grant program. The campaign was highly successful and the reduction in capture had a positive effect on enrollment and student learning. (JEL: D73, I22, O12)

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jeea.2005.3.2-3.259

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 2003, Remedying Education: Evidence from Two Randomized Experiments in India.
  2. 2004, Public Funding in the Educational Sector and Its Effect on Test Scores.
  3. 2003, Survey Tools for Assessing Performance in Service Delivery.
  4. 2002, Schools and Skills in Developing Countries: Education Policies and Socioeconomic Outcomes., Journal of Economic Literature, XL, 436
  5. 2002, Textbooks and Test Scores: Evidence from a Prospective Evaluation in Kenya.
  6. 2004, Retrospective vs. Prospective Analyses of School Inputs: The Case of Flip Charts in Kenya., Journal of Development Economics, 74, 251, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.12.010 · DOI
  7. 2004, Worms: Identifying Impacts on Education and Health in the Presence of Treatment Externalities., Econometrica, 72, 159, 10.1111/j.1468-0262.2004.00481.x · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2004, Local Capture: Evidence from a Central Government Transfer Program in Uganda., Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 679, 10.1162/0033553041382120 · DOI
  9. 2004, The Power of Information: Evidence from a Newspaper Campaign to Reduce Capture.
  10. 2004, School Subsidies for the Poor: Evaluating the Mexican PROGRESA Poverty Program., Journal of Development Economics, 74, 199, 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.12.009 · DOI
  11. World Bank, 1996, Access to Education and Health Care in Uganda.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Reinikka, R., & Svensson, J.
Affiliations
World Bank (US)
Venue
Journal of the European Economic Association
Published
2005-05-01
Volume
3
Issue
2-3
Pages
259-267
ISSN
  • 1542-4766 (ISSN-L)
  • 1542-4774
OpenAlex
W2024358613
Cited by
719
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 55 · 2013: 52 · 2012: 48
FWCI
61.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the European Economic Association (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Sciences › Development › Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Keywords
corruption, primary school enrollment, student learning, education grants, social service delivery, newspaper campaigns, information provision, school monitoring, Uganda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review