The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Life‐Cycle Assessment: Constraints on Moving from Inventory to Impact Assessment
Abstract
Summary: Life‐cycle assessment (LCA) is a technique for systematically analyzing a product from cradle‐to‐grave, that is, from resource extraction through manufacture and use to disposal. LCA is a mixed or hybrid analytical system. An inventory phase analyzes system inputs of energy and materials along with outputs of emissions and wastes throughout life cycle, usually as quantitative mass loadings. An impact assessment phase then examines these loadings in light of potential environmental issues using a mixed spectrum of qualitative and quantitative methods. The constraints imposed by inventory's loss of spatial, temporal, dose‐response, and threshold information raise concerns about the accuracy of impact assessment. The degree of constraint varies widely according to the environmental issue in question and models used to extrapolate the inventory data. LCA results may have limited value in two areas: (I) local and/ortransient biophysical processes and (2) issues involving biological parameters, such as biodiversity, habitat alteration, and toxicity. The end result is that impact assessment does not measure actual effects or impacts, nor does it calculate the likelihood of an effect or risk Rather, LCA impact assessment results are largely directional environmental indicaton. The accuracy and usefulness of indicators need to be assessed individually and in a circumstance‐specific manner prior to decision making. This limits LCAs usefulness as the sole basis for comprehensive assessments and the comparisons of alternatives. In conclusion, LCA may identify potential issues from a systemwide perspective, but more‐focused assessments using other analytical techniques are often necessary to resolve the issues.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Life-cycle inventory analysis of concrete production: A critical review
Petek Gursel, A., Masanet, E., Horvath, A., & Stadel, A. (2014) · Cement and Concrete Composites · doi:10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2014.03.005 · Cited by 451
Plevin, R. J., Delucchi, M. A., & Creutzig, F. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12074 · Cited by 425
Life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to the process industry: a review
Jacquemin, L., Pontalier, P.-Y., & Sablayrolles, C. (2012) · The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment · doi:10.1007/s11367-012-0432-9 · Cited by 316
A scenario analysis of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of a new residential area
Säynäjoki, A., Heinonen, J., & Junnila, S. (2012) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/7/3/034037 · Cited by 147
Life-cycle assessment and temporal distributions of emissions: developing a fleet-based analysis
Field, F., Kirchain, R., & Clark, J. (2000) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1162/108819800569816 · Cited by 110
Metadata
- Authors
- Owens, J. W.
- Venue
- Journal of Industrial Ecology
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-49
- ISSN
- 1088-1980 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-9290
- OpenAlex
- W2171102230
- Cited by
- 188
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Life‐Cycle Assessment: Constraints on Moving from Inventory to Impact Assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/jiec.1997.1.1.37
- The paper
- Owens, J. W. (1997). Life‐Cycle Assessment: Constraints on Moving from Inventory to Impact Assessment. Journal of Industrial Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1162/jiec.1997.1.1.37
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.