The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 158 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neural Representations and Mechanisms for the Performance of Simple Speech Sequences
Open accessAbstract
Speakers plan the phonological content of their utterances before their release as speech motor acts. Using a finite alphabet of learned phonemes and a relatively small number of syllable structures, speakers are able to rapidly plan and produce arbitrary syllable sequences that fall within the rules of their language. The class of computational models of sequence planning and performance termed competitive queuing models have followed K. S. Lashley [The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112-136). New York: Wiley, 1951] in assuming that inherently parallel neural representations underlie serial action, and this idea is increasingly supported by experimental evidence. In this article, we developed a neural model that extends the existing DIVA model of speech production in two complementary ways. The new model includes paired structure and content subsystems [cf. MacNeilage, P. F. The frame/content theory of evolution of speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 499-511, 1998 ] that provide parallel representations of a forthcoming speech plan as well as mechanisms for interfacing these phonological planning representations with learned sensorimotor programs to enable stepping through multisyllabic speech plans. On the basis of previous reports, the model's components are hypothesized to be localized to specific cortical and subcortical structures, including the left inferior frontal sulcus, the medial premotor cortex, the basal ganglia, and the thalamus. The new model, called gradient order DIVA, thus fills a void in current speech research by providing formal mechanistic hypotheses about both phonological and phonetic processes that are grounded by neuroanatomy and physiology. This framework also generates predictions that can be tested in future neuroimaging and clinical case studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Finally, the left putamen and thalamus were incorporated into a motor loop that passes activity from the SMA via the putamen to the thalamus and into the motor cortex (Bohland et al., 2010).”
From A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading (2012) · cites this paper as Bohland et al., 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764 · Cited by 23,191 · cited 1×
“Such multiplicative or shunting terms (Grossberg, 1973) are motivated by empirically observed cell membrane properties (e.g., Hodgkin & Huxley, 1952).”
Elman, J. L. (1990) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1402_1 · Cited by 11,212 · cited 2×
“More recent neural network models (Beiser & Houk, 1998; Elman, 1990; Lewandowsky & Murdock, 1989; Jordan, 1986) proposed revisions that rely”
Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex
Alexander, G. E., DeLong, M. R., & Strick, P. L. (1986) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.09.030186.002041 · Cited by 8,527 · cited 3×
“The organization of BG circuits into largely parallel loops (Alexander & Crutcher, 1990; Alexander et al., 1986) offers one possible substrate for the cascaded processing stages that enable linguistic selections from competing alternatives; these selections (cf. choice layer activations) can then…”
The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity
Cowan, N. (2001) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x01003922 · Cited by 6,779 · cited 1×
“These properties help explain why there is a low limit (see Cowan, 2000) to the number of items that can be planned in working memory and recalled in the correct order.”
A theory of lexical access in speech production
Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99001776 · Cited by 5,295 · cited 3×
“SSM representations are functionally similar to a mental syllabary (Levelt & Wheeldon, 1994; Crompton, 1982), suggested by Levelt et al. (1999) to consist of a “repository of gestural scores for the frequently used syllables of the language” (p. 5).”
Speaking: from intention to articulation
(1989) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.27-1947 · Cited by 5,017 · cited 2×
“Such models generally follow the theoretical work of Levelt ( 1989 ), Garrett ( 1975 ), and others.”
Speaking: From Intention to Articulation
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6393.001.0001 · Cited by 4,804
Functional architecture of basal ganglia circuits: neural substrates of parallel processing
Alexander, G. E., & Crutcher, M. D. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90107-l · Cited by 4,131 · cited 3×
“Interactions between the cortex and the BG are organized into multiple loop circuits (Middleton & Strick, 2000; Alexander & Crutcher, 1990; Alexander, DeLong, & Strick, 1986).”
Speaking. From Intention to Articulation
Caplan, D. N. (1990) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(90)90151-y · Cited by 4,036
The Handbook of brain theory and neural networks
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-4484 · Cited by 3,913
Research works printed but not linked: 7
- Baayen, 1995, The CELEX lexical database (release 2) [CD-ROM].
- Bullock, 2003, Competitive queuing for serial planning and performance., 241
- Jonas, 1987, The supplementary motor region and speech., 241
- Rogers, 2001, Spoken word production without assembly: Is it possible?, Aphasiology, 15, 68
- Shattuck-Hufnagel, 1979, Speech errors as evidence for a serial order mechanism in sentence production., 295
- Van der Merwe, 1997, A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control., 1
- Werker, 1992, Infant speech perception and phonological acquisition., 285
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 392
Phonetic encoding in utterance production: a review of open issues from 1989 to 2018
Laganaro, M. (2019) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1599128 · Cited by 29
Perceptuo-motor effects of response-distractor compatibility in speech: beyond phonemic identity
Roon, K. D., & Gafos, A. I. (2014) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-014-0666-6 · Cited by 27
Grey matter volume differences in the left caudate nucleus of people who stutter
Sowman, P. F., Ryan, M., Johnson, B. W., Savage, G. R., Crain, S., Harrison, E., Martin, E., & Burianová, H. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.009 · Cited by 26
Speech Movement Variability in People Who Stutter: A Vocal Tract Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study
Wiltshire, C. E. E., Chiew, M., Chesters, J., Healy, M. P., & Watkins, K. E. (2021) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00507 · Cited by 27
“One possibility is that stuttering is caused by a discrepancy between the expected utter-ance and the actual utterance produced (Bohland et al., 2010; Guenther, 2016; Max et al., 2004) caused by an error in the predicted movement, the actual movement, or less tolerance of a typical range of error.”
A Theoretical Framework for Human and Nonhuman Vocal Interaction
Castellucci, G. A., Guenther, F. H., & Long, M. A. (2022) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-111020-094807 · Cited by 28
“The Plan Buffering module in the CPI framework therefore resembles working memory steps in other models (Baddeley 1992, Bohland et al. 2010); however, we hypothesize this module also stores nonvocal communicative actions (e.g., co-speech gestures) and therefore subsumes other domain-specific…”
BackgroundMethodWhite matter impairment in the speech network of individuals with autism spectrum disorder
Peeva, M. G., Tourville, J. A., Agam, Y., Holland, B., Manoach, D. S., & Guenther, F. H. (2013) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.011 · Cited by 28
“The left vPMC has been identified as the primary cortical site for the motor programs that underlie syllable production (Bohland et al., 2010; Guenther et al., 2006; Peeva et al., 2010).”
Bowers, A. L., Bowers, L. M., Hudock, D., & Ramsdell-Hudock, H. L. (2018) · Journal of Fluency Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.08.006 · Cited by 26
To lump or to split? Possible subtypes of apraxia of speech
Mailend, M., & Maas, E. (2020) · Aphasiology · doi:10.1080/02687038.2020.1836319 · Cited by 25
“We chose to illustrate the potential for elucidating AOS subtypes within the DIVA/ GODIVA models because they are computationally specified, well-supported by evidence from typical speakers, and have been used to guide recent experimental investigations of AOS that presented individual speaker data.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialArticulatory gestures are individually selected in production
Tilsen, S., & Goldstein, L. M. (2012) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2012.08.005 · Cited by 25
“We consider segmentally coherent selection to be a null hypothesis because it is a common assumption in production models (e.g. Bohland et al., 2010; Levelt et al., 1999).”
Grossberg, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2022.766239 · Cited by 25
Mental operations in rhythm: Motor-to-sensory transformation mediates imagined singing
Li, Y., Luo, H., & Tian, X. (2020) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3000504 · Cited by 22
“The observed IFG, premotor and 8 insular cortices in the frontal region during imagined singing have been demonstrated 9 in articulatory preparation during overt speech [30, 51, 52] and covert speech [53, 54].”
BackgroundMasapollo, M., Segawa, J. A., Beal, D. S., Tourville, J. A., Nieto-Castañón, A., Heyne, M., Frankford, S. A., & Guenther, F. H. (2020) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00027 · Cited by 22
“For example, in theGradientOrderDirections Into Velocities of the Articulators (GODIVA) model of speech sequencing and initiation (Bohland et al., 2010; Civier et al., 2013; Guenther, 2016, Chapter 8; Segawa, Masapollo, et al., 2019), it is proposed that continual speech motor practice leads to the…”
MethodAxial Organization of a Brain Region That Sequences a Learned Pattern of Behavior
Stauffer, T. R., Elliott, K. C., Ross, M. T., Basista, M. J., Hyson, R. L., & Johnson, F. (2012) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0978-12.2012 · Cited by 23
“Whether a similar axial organization might be observed within cortical regions that control vocal sequences in humans (Bohland et al., 2010; Price, 2010) is an intriguing question for future research.”
BackgroundGastaldon, S., Busan, P., Arcara, G., & Peressotti, F. (2023) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhad004 · Cited by 23
Kazerounian, S., & Grossberg, S. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01053 · Cited by 22
Berthier, M. L., De-Torres, I., Paredes‐Pacheco, J., Roé-Vellvé, N., Thurnhofer‐Hemsi, K., Torres‐Prioris, M. J., Alfaro, F., Moreno‐Torres, I., López-Barroso, D., & Dávila, G. (2017) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00304 · Cited by 22
“The pre-SMA and SMA participate on planning and motor initiation and interact with the executive motor cortex via the basal ganglia (motor loop) and thalamus (Bohland and Guenther, 2006; Bohland et al., 2010).”
BackgroundFunctional Parcellation of the Speech Production Cortex
Tourville, J. A., Nieto-Castañón, A., Heyne, M., & Guenther, F. H. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0442 · Cited by 22
“org Boston University on 09/18/2019 We have previously hypothesized that the left inferior frontal sulcus acts as a phonological working memory buffer, interacting with the medial prefrontal cortex (SMA and preSMA) and the posterior inferior frontal gyrus (Bohland et al., 2010), so it is somewhat surprising that this…”
BackgroundGarnett, E. O., Chow, H. M., & Chang, S. (2019) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2019_jslhr-s-csmc7-18-0356 · Cited by 22
Perkell, J. S. (2013) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2013/12-0382 · Cited by 22
Neef, N. E., Angstadt, M., Koenraads, S. P. C., & Chang, S. (2022) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac328 · Cited by 21
Etter, N. M., Miller, O. M., & Ballard, K. J. (2017) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2017_ajslp-16-0151 · Cited by 20
Stuttering severity relates to frontotemporal low-beta synchronization during pre-speech preparation
Korzeczek, A., Neef, N. E., Steinmann, I., Paulus, W., & Sommer, M. (2022) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2022.03.010 · Cited by 23
Auditory rhythm discrimination in adults who stutter: An fMRI study
Garnett, E. O., McAuley, J. D., Wieland, E. A., Chow, H. M., Zhu, D. C., Dilley, L. C., & Chang, S. (2022) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2022.105219 · Cited by 19
Neurocomputational modeling of speech motor development
Meier, A. M., & Guenther, F. H. (2023) · Journal of Child Language · doi:10.1017/s0305000923000260 · Cited by 20
“Here we describe an extension to the DIVA model called the Gradient Order DIVA (GODIVA) model (Bohland, Bullock, & Guenther, 2010) that describes the neural processes underlying the buffering and sequential production of longer utterances consisting of multiple speech sounds, such as phrases or…”
MethodAnatomy and lateralization of the human corticobulbar tracts: an fMRI-guided tractography study
Liegeois, F. J., Butler, J. L., Morgan, A. T., Clayden, J. D., & Clark, C. A. (2015) · Brain Structure and Function · doi:10.1007/s00429-015-1104-x · Cited by 19
“This “final motor pathway” is present in all current computational and anatomical models of speech production (e.g. Bohland et al. 2010; Duffau 2015; Eickhoff et al. 2009; Hickok 2012).”
Cullum, A., Hodgetts, W. E., Milburn, T. F., & Cummine, J. (2019) · The Cerebellum · doi:10.1007/s12311-019-01024-6 · Cited by 19
Age-related deficits in speech production: From phonological planning to motor implementation
Tremblay, P., Poulin, J., Martel‐Sauvageau, V., & Denis, C. (2019) · Experimental Gerontology · doi:10.1016/j.exger.2019.110695 · Cited by 22
Electrophysiological Correlates of Monitoring in Typing with and without Visual Feedback
Pinet, S., & Nozari, N. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01500 · Cited by 22
Cerebellar Contributions to Speech and Language
Ackermann, H., & Brendel, B. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-407794-2.00007-9 · Cited by 19
Response retrieval and motor planning during typing
Pinet, S., Dubarry, A., & Alario, F. ‐. (2016) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2016.05.012 · Cited by 18
An informal logic of feedback-based temporal control
Tilsen, S. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.851991 · Cited by 18
“The concept of competitive selection of actions originates from Grossberg (1987), and many variations of the idea have been explored subsequently, both within and outside of speech (Bullock and Rhodes, 2002; Bullock, 2004; Bohland et al., 2010; Bhutani et al., 2013; Tilsen, 2013; Glasspool, 2014; Kristan, 2014).”
BackgroundMethodChunking of phonological units in speech sequencing
Segawa, J. A., Masapollo, M., Tong, M., Smith, D. J., & Guenther, F. H. (2019) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2019.05.001 · Cited by 18
“2 provides a possible account of these findings, based on the GODIVA model of speech sequencing (Bohland et al., 2010; Guenther, 2016).”
Davis, M., & Redford, M. A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02121 · Cited by 19
Mailend, M., & Maas, E. (2013) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2013/12-0101 · Cited by 18
Loss of regional accent after damage to the speech production network
Berthier, M. L., Dávila, G., Moreno‐Torres, I., Beltrán‐Corbellini, Á., Santana-Moreno, D., Roé-Vellvé, N., Thurnhofer‐Hemsi, K., Torres‐Prioris, M. J., Massone, M. I., & Ruiz‐Cruces, R. (2015) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2015.00610 · Cited by 18
Internally Versus Externally Cued Speech in Parkinson's Disease and Cerebellar Disease
Weir-Mayta, P., Spencer, K. A., Eadie, T. L., Yorkston, K. M., Savaglio, S., & Woollcott, C. (2017) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2017_ajslp-16-0109 · Cited by 18
Preston, J. L., Caballero, N. F., Leece, M. C., Wang, D., Herbst, B. M., & Benway, N. R. (2023) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2023_jslhr-22-00622 · Cited by 19
Berthier, M. L., Roé-Vellvé, N., Moreno‐Torres, I., Falcón, C., Thurnhofer‐Hemsi, K., Paredes‐Pacheco, J., Torres‐Prioris, M. J., De-Torres, I., Alfaro, F., Gutiérrez-Cardo, A., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00399 · Cited by 17
Mailend, M., Maas, E., Beeson, P. M., Story, B. H., & Forster, K. I. (2019) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.02.018 · Cited by 17
Boisgontier, J., Fillon, L., Rutten, C., Saitovitch, A., Dufour, C., Lemaître, H., Beccaria, K., Blauwblomme, T., Levy, R., Dangouloff‐Ros, V., et al. (2021) · Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism · doi:10.1177/0271678x211031321 · Cited by 16
“the pre-SMA would start the encoding word selection process and the SMA would initiate the motor program.(25) The axonal projections between the pre-SMA and the SMA would facilitate the interactions between the basal ganglia, motor, premotor cortex and the SMA to activate the “initiation map” in the SMA starting the p…”
BackgroundCummine, J., Hanif, W., Dymouriak-Tymashov, I., Anchuri, K., Chiu, S. H., & Boliek, C. A. (2017) · Brain Topography · doi:10.1007/s10548-017-0553-3 · Cited by 16
“Stimuli were matched for onset phoneme, length, bigram sum, frequency (in the case of the real words), phonological neighborhood, and orthographic neighborhood.2 The words were presented in five different lists: pure regular (all regular words; total = 50), pure exception (all exception words; 1…”
BackgroundSpeech Impairment in Boys With Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders
Terband, H., Spruit, M., & Maassen, B. (2018) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2018_ajslp-17-0013 · Cited by 16
Steadiness of syllable repetition in early motor stages of Parkinson's disease
Skodda, S. (2014) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2014.04.009 · Cited by 16
Masked primes activate feature representations in reading aloud.
Mousikou, P., Roon, K. D., & Rastle, K. (2014) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000072 · Cited by 15
Lancheros, M., Friedrichs, D., & Laganaro, M. (2023) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci13040655 · Cited by 15
“For instance, motor programming inhibition [20] may play a role in preventing gestural overlap across repeated syllables in AMR tasks, which could also explain the slower rates observed in this task in older groups.”
BackgroundNeural substrates of verbal repetition deficits in primary progressive aphasia
Miller, H. E., Cordella, C., Collins, J. A., Ezzo, R., Quimby, M., Hochberg, D., Tourville, J. A., Dickerson, B. C., & Guenther, F. H. (2021) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcab015 · Cited by 15
“In this study, we focus on working memory-related predictions based on the Gradient Order Directions into Velocities of Articulators (GODIVA) model, which is a neurocomputational model of the processes involved in the planning and sequencing of multisyllabic utterances (Bohland et al., 2010; Guenther, 2016).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialTransfer of statistical learning from passive speech perception to speech production
Murphy, T. K., Nozari, N., & Holt, L. L. (2023) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02399-8 · Cited by 14
“Perception of one’s own speech influences speech production (e.g., Bohland et al., 2010; Guenther, 1994).”
BackgroundUpdating functional brain units: Insights far beyond Luria
Peña‐Casanova, J., Sánchez‐Benavides, G., & Sigg-Alonso, J. (2024) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2024.02.004 · Cited by 16
Monitoring, control and repair in word production
Nozari, N. (2025) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-025-00417-1 · Cited by 14
“Within the motor speech tradition, the main model is the ‘direc-tions into velocities of articulators’ (DIVA) model and its later version, ‘gradient order DIVA’ or GODIVA 3,38,39 .”
Reilly, K. J., & Spencer, K. A. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077450 · Cited by 15
“Although definitive findings regarding cortical processing of effects of either phonologic or phonemic similarity are lacking, neural models have posited that processing-related similarity also engages inferior frontal regions of cortex [8,75].”
BackgroundEdelman, S. (2017) · Language Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2017.04.003 · Cited by 14
“, 2015); ADIOS-MT, an application of ADIOS to machine translation (Edelman and Solan, 2009); GODIVA, gradient order directions into velocities of articulators, (Bohland et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialBullock, D. H., Tan, C. O., & John, Y. J. (2009) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2009.06.008 · Cited by 14
“For example, Bohland et al. (2009) are exploring the hypothesis that the BG are critical for ensuring that speech acts satisfy the multiple types of constraints that must be met by linguistic productions if they are to succeed as conventional communications.”
Roehrich-Gascon, D., Small, S. L., & Tremblay, P. (2015) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2015.06.004 · Cited by 16
The neural basis of word production
Nozari, N. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.12 · Cited by 12
Articulatory Gain Predicts Motor Cortex and Subthalamic Nucleus Activity During Speech
Dastolfo‐Hromack, C., Bush, A., Chrabaszcz, A. V., Alhourani, A., Lipski, W. J., Wang, D., Crammond, D. J., Shaiman, S., Dickey, M. W., Holt, L. L., et al. (2021) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhab251 · Cited by 15
“Theoretical studies, as well as studies in patients implanted with deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads, also have highlighted the basal ganglia as an important node in the speech motor control network (Murdoch 2001; Bohland et al. 2010; Martel Sauvageau et al. 2015; Aldridge et al. 2016).”
BackgroundSelection and coordination of articulatory gestures in temporally constrained production
Tilsen, S. (2014) · J. Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2013.12.004 · Cited by 20
Skodda, S., Lorenz, J., & Schlegel, U. S. (2012) · Basal Ganglia · doi:10.1016/j.baga.2012.11.002 · Cited by 13
The representation and execution of articulatory timing in first and second language acquisition
Redford, M. A., & Oh, G. E. (2017) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2017.01.004 · Cited by 13
Reed, A., Cummine, J., Bakhtiari, R., Fox, C., & Boliek, C. A. (2017) · Developmental Neuroscience · doi:10.1159/000478724 · Cited by 13
Terband, H., Rodd, J., & Maas, E. (2019) · International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1080/17549507.2019.1669711 · Cited by 14
“SSM cells represent speech sounds (the size of phonemes, syllables, or frequent words and phrases) and are activated by higher-level input from the phonological encoding stage (Bohland, Bullock, & Guenther, 2010; Guenther et al., 2006).”
BackgroundSpeech perception, production, and the sensorimotor mu rhythm
Jenson, D. E., Thornton, D. M., Saltuklaroglu, T., & Harkrider, A. W. (2014) · Biomedical Sciences and Engineering Conference (BSEC) · doi:10.1109/bsec.2014.6867736 · Cited by 17
“In speech production, the dorsal stream enables feedforward and feedback loops necessary for fluent production at normal speech rates with online dynamic error correction [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] ([20]).”
BackgroundOn The Dynamics of Lexical Access In Two or More Languages
Kroll, J. F., Bice, K., Botezatu, M. R., & Zirnstein, M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.26 · Cited by 13
Bullock, L., Forseth, K. J., Woolnough, O., Rollo, P. S., & Tandon, N. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111531 · Cited by 17
Structural disconnection of the posterior medial frontal cortex reduces speech error monitoring
McCall, J. D., Dickens, J. V., Mandal, A. S., DeMarco, A. T., Fama, M. E., Lacey, E. H., Kelkar, A. S., Medaglia, J. D., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2022) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2021.102934 · Cited by 12
“perception regions proceeds directly between speech production regions in the inferior frontal gyrus and ventral premotor cortex to auditory cortical areas in the temporal lobe (Bohland et al., 2010; Guenther & Vladusich, 2012).”
Speech sequencing in the human precentral gyrus
Liu, J. R., Zhao, L., Hullett, P. W., & Chang, E. F. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02250-1 · Cited by 15
“19–23).”
InfluentialRelationship between the Sequencing and Timing of Vocal Motor Elements in Birdsong
Matheson, A. M. M., & Sakata, J. T. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143203 · Cited by 12
Mailend, M., Maas, E., Beeson, P. M., Story, B. H., & Forster, K. I. (2020) · Cognitive Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/02643294.2020.1847059 · Cited by 13
“The current study focuses on two empirically supported hypotheses about the underlying mechanism in AOS: the Reduced Buffer Capacity Hypothesis (Rogers & Storkel, 1999) and the Program Retrieval Deficit Hypothesis (Bohland et al., 2010; Mailend & Maas, 2013; McNeil et al., 2004).”
MethodGuenther, F. H., Tourville, J. A., & Bohland, J. W. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00265-7 · Cited by 12
Involvement of the Central Cognitive Mechanism in Word Production in Adults Who Stutter
Tsai, P.-T., & Ratner, N. B. (2016) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2016_jslhr-s-14-0224 · Cited by 13
Rowe, H. P., Tourville, J. A., Nieto-Castañón, A., Garnett, E. O., Chow, H. M., Chang, S., & Guenther, F. H. (2024) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105417 · Cited by 11
Reinvestigating the Neural Bases Involved in Speech Production of Stutterers: An ALE Meta-Analysis
Zhang, N., Yin, Y., Jiang, Y., & Huang, C. (2022) · Brain Sciences · doi:10.3390/brainsci12081030 · Cited by 11
“A neurocomputational model—directions into velocities of articulators (DIVA)— specified the relationship between the behavioral and neural underpinnings of stuttering [35,36].”
MethodProton Chemical Shift Imaging of the Brain in Pediatric and Adult Developmental Stuttering
O’Neill, J., Dong, Z., Bansal, R., Ivanov, I., Hao, X., Desai, J. D., Pozzi, E., & Peterson, B. S. (2016) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3199 · Cited by 11
Microstructural white matter changes underlying speech deficits in Parkinson’s disease
Mollaei, F., & Chinoor, M. A. B. (2024) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2024.105378 · Cited by 10
“As proposed by the GODIVA framework (Bohland et al., 2010), this motor circuit monitors the initiation and production of speech.”
Tremblay, P., & Brambati, S. M. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1420133 · Cited by 10
“The more recent Goal-oriented dynamics of articulators (GODIVA) model (Bohland et al., 2010) extends DIVA by incorporating dynamic aspects of articulatory movements, temporal dynamics, and improved error correction.”
BackgroundKearney, E., McMahon, K. L., Guenther, F. H., Arciuli, J., & de Zubicaray, G. I. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105972 · Cited by 10
“To date, models of speech production have implemented rule-based mechanisms to assemble sequences of phonemes according to the pho-notactic constraints of a given language (e.g., Bohland et al., 2010; Dell et al., 2000; Levelt et al., 1999).”
MethodFunctional anatomy and topographical organization of the frontotemporal arcuate fasciculus
Basile, G. A., Nozais, V., Quartarone, A., Giustiniani, A., Ielo, A., Cerasa, A., Milardi, D., Abdallah, M., de Schotten, M. T., Forkel, S. J., et al. (2024) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-024-07274-3 · Cited by 10
Kröger, B. J., Bekolay, T., & Cao, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.844529 · Cited by 13
“, 1999) or mainly concentrate on modeling the sensorimotor aspects of speech production (e.g., Guenther, 2006; Bohland et al., 2010) it is the goal of our model sketch to give the complete view on speech production, i.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialShao, J., Bakhtiar, M., & Zhang, C. (2022) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-21-00276 · Cited by 10
Differences in implicit motor learning between adults who do and do not stutter
Höbler, F., Bitan, T., Tremblay, L., & Nil, L. D. (2022) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2022.108342 · Cited by 13
“The pars opercularis and basal ganglia also play an essential role during speech development, supporting the sequential articulation of phonemic gestures to form well-learnt and automatized speech motor programs (Bohland et al., 2010; Dick et al., 2019).”
BackgroundO’Brien, A. M., Perrachione, T. K., Weil, L. W., Araujo, Y. S., Halverson, K. K., Harris, A., Ostrovskaya, I., Kjelgaard, M., Wexler, K. N., Tager-Flusberg, H. B., et al. (2022) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103299 · Cited by 13
“According to the GODIVA neurocomputational model of speech processing (Bohland et al., 2010), IFG and SMA/pre-SMA subserve parallel phonological buffers, with the former encoding phonemic sequences and the latter representing abstract syllable frames and/or premotor sequencing of speech (Tremblay &…”
Bohland, J. W., Myers, E. M., & Kim, E. (2013) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-013-9201-6 · Cited by 11
“While there are a number of models of speech production (e.g., Guenther et al. 2006; Bohland et al. 2010b; Hickok et al. 2011), speech perception and processing (e.g., Hickok and Poeppel 2004, 2007; Rauschecker and Scott 2009), and theoretical accounts for language processing (e.g., Friederici…”
BackgroundInfluentialKröger, B. J., Bafna, T., & Cao, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01462 · Cited by 10
Frequency-tagged visual evoked responses track syllable effects in visual word recognition
Montani, V., Chanoine, V., Jonathan Grainger, B., & Ziegler, J. C. (2019) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2019.08.014 · Cited by 11
Language Control and Attention during Conversation
Green, D. W. (2019) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119387725.ch21 · Cited by 10
Matsuhashi, K., Itahashi, T., Aoki, R., & Hashimoto, R. (2023) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2023.110827 · Cited by 10
“In an influential computational model of speech production, the Gradient Order DIVA model (Bohland et al., 2010), the connection constitutes an input to the motor loop, and the information flow from SMA to putamen is proposed to control the initiation of motor programs for speech production.”
MethodLittlejohn, M., & Maas, E. (2023) · International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders · doi:10.1111/1460-6984.12934 · Cited by 9
Functional brain outcomes of L2 speech learning emerge during sensorimotor transformation
Carey, D., Miquel, M. E., Evans, B. G., Adank, P., & McGettigan, C. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.053 · Cited by 9
“…and executing appropriate speech articulatory plans, and relaying auditory and somatosensory feedback in order to correct speech errors online (Hickok, 2012; see also Guenther, 2006; Bohland et al., 2010; Simmonds et al., 2014a; Cogan et al., 2014; Parker-Jones et al., 2013; Chang et al., 2013).”
Motor learning guided treatment for acquired apraxia of speech
Johnson, R. K. (2017) · Speech Language and Hearing · doi:10.1080/2050571x.2017.1379721 · Cited by 7
Nuclear vowel priming and anticipatory oral postures: evidence for parallel phonological planning?
Krause, P. A., & Kawamoto, A. H. (2019) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1636104 · Cited by 9
“…UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group CONTACT Peter A. Krause peakraus@ucsc.edu their associated phonemes incrementally from left to right, according to GODIVA word-level representations excite all the elements of their phonological planning gradient co-temporally (Bohland et al., 2010).”
BackgroundMethodMagnuson, J. S., & Crinnion, A. M. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198845003.013.23 · Cited by 10
Oxford Handbooks in Linguistics
(2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191954481.003.0108 · Cited by 9
Leclercq, A., Waelkens, V., Roelant, E., Allegaert, M., Verhaegen, I., Claes, K., Dauvister, E., Snijders, S., Eggers, K., Moyse, A., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0304212 · Cited by 8
Deepa, G., Shrikrishna, B. H., Gajbe, U., Singh, B. R., Sawal, A., & Balwir, T. (2022) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.28653 · Cited by 8
“The GODIVA model replicates brain cell activity and explains how the brain can store random utterances that follow a speaker's grammar [34].”
BackgroundDIVA Meets EEG: Model Validation Using Formant-Shift Reflex
Cuadros, J., Rivera, L. Z., Castro, C., Whitaker, G., Otero, M., Weinstein, A., Martínez-Montes, E., Prado, P., & Zañartu, M. (2023) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app13137512 · Cited by 8
“The DIVA environment, which also comprises the gradient order DIVA (GODIVA) for the analysis of speech sequencing [66], is now enriched with a new neuroimaging modality (EEG).”
BackgroundPerceptuomotor compatibility effects in vowels: Beyond phonemic identity
Mokari, P. G., Gafos, A. I., & Williams, D. (2020) · Attention Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/s13414-020-02014-1 · Cited by 11
Malloy, J. R., Nistal, D. A., Heyne, M., Tardif, M. C., & Bohland, J. W. (2022) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2022_jslhr-21-00427 · Cited by 9
Reilly, K. J., & Spencer, K. A. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00665 · Cited by 8
Action and Language Mechanisms in the Brain: Data, Models and Neuroinformatics
Arbib, M. A., Bonaiuto, J. J., Bornkessel‐Schlesewsky, I., Kemmerer, D. L., MacWhinney, B., Nielsen, F. Å., & Öztop, E. (2013) · Neuroinformatics · doi:10.1007/s12021-013-9210-5 · Cited by 8
“Linking between items in the databases may not be straightforward as they can have " fuzzy " relationships, e.g., as shown in the Online Brain Atlas Reconciliation Tool (OBART) (Bohland et al. 2009a) where corresponding brain regions in different atlases often do not overlap completely.”
InfluentialSimione, M., Fregni, F., & Green, J. R. (2018) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00033 · Cited by 8
“…complex behaviors, such as spoken word production, this entails that stimulation of the motor cortex is likely to affect the many concurrent processes (i.e., linguistic, cognitive, attention) engaged during speech production (Bohland et al., 2010) and level of skill required for the specific task.”
BackgroundExploring the role of subcortical structures in developmental reading impairments
Cheema, K., Lantz, N., & Cummine, J. (2017) · Neuroreport · doi:10.1097/wnr.0000000000000938 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Bohland, J. W., Bullock, D., & Guenther, F. H.
- Affiliations
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (US)
- Boston University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2010-07-01
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1504-1529
- ISSN
- 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
- 1530-8898
- PMC
- PMC2937837
- OpenAlex
- W2114774561
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 158
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Institutional Repository (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (0354378)
- National Institutes of Health (NIH-R01, DC002852)
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (R01DC002852, R01DC007683)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phonetics and Phonology Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- speech production, phonological planning, sequence planning, DIVA model, serial order, basal ganglia, thalamus
- MeSH terms
- Basal Ganglia, Computer Simulation, Frontal Lobe, Models, Neurological, Neural Pathways, Phonetics, Psychomotor Performance, Speech, Thalamus
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review