The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noise Injection: Theoretical Prospects
Abstract
Noise injection consists of adding noise to the inputs during neural network training. Experimental results suggest that it might improve the generalization ability of the resulting neural network. A justification of this improvement remains elusive: describing analytically the average perturbed cost function is difficult, and controlling the fluctuations of the random perturbed cost function is hard. Hence, recent papers suggest replacing the random perturbed cost by a (deterministic) Taylor approximation of the average perturbed cost function. This article takes a different stance: when the injected noise is gaussian, noise injection is naturally connected to the action of the heat kernel. This provides indications on the relevance domain of traditional Taylor expansions and shows the dependence of the quality of Taylor approximations on global smoothness properties of neural networks under consideration. The connection between noise injection and heat kernel also enables controlling the fluctuations of the random perturbed cost function. Under the global smoothness assumption, tools from gaussian analysis provide bounds on the tail behavior of the perturbed cost. This finally suggests that mixing input perturbation with smoothness-based penalization might be profitable.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Therefore, lower noise data is not necessarily better and adding noise to the training data might in some instances even improve performance200–202.”
From The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: A systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [201]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1162/neco.1996.8.3.643 · DOI · Paper page
- Auer P., 1996, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 8, 316
- 10.1162/neco.1995.7.1.108 · DOI · Paper page
- Comon P., 1992, Traitement du Signal, 8, 387
- 10.1109/21.370200 · DOI
- 10.1016/0890-5401(92)90010-D · DOI
- 10.1109/72.105415 · DOI
- 10.1162/neco.1995.7.5.974 · DOI
- 10.1109/21.155944 · DOI
- 10.1109/72.377960 · DOI
- 10.1016/0893-6080(91)90033-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02124746 · DOI
- 10.1109/72.286908 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The METRIC-framework for assessing data quality for trustworthy AI in medicine: A systematic review
Schwabe, D., Becker, K., Seyferth, M., Klaß, A., & Schaeffter, T. (2024) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-024-01196-4 · Cited by 169
Quantum computing and supervised machine learning
Oneto, L., Ridella, S., & Anguita, D. (2017) · Quantum Inspired Computational Intelligence · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-804409-4.00002-4 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Grandvalet, Y., Canu, S., & Boucheron, S.
- Affiliations
- Université de Technologie de Compiègne (FR)
- Université Paris-Sud (FR)
- Venue
- Neural Computation
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1093-1108
- ISSN
- 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
- 1530-888X
- OpenAlex
- W1964929969
- Cited by
- 147
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 1.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute for Scientific Interchange
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- noise injection, neural network training, generalization, heat kernel, Gaussian perturbation, Taylor series expansion, global smoothness, Gaussian analysis, tail bounds, input perturbation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review