Cited by 147Stochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesNeural Networks and ApplicationsMachine Learning and Data Classification

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Noise Injection: Theoretical Prospects

Abstract

Noise injection consists of adding noise to the inputs during neural network training. Experimental results suggest that it might improve the generalization ability of the resulting neural network. A justification of this improvement remains elusive: describing analytically the average perturbed cost function is difficult, and controlling the fluctuations of the random perturbed cost function is hard. Hence, recent papers suggest replacing the random perturbed cost by a (deterministic) Taylor approximation of the average perturbed cost function. This article takes a different stance: when the injected noise is gaussian, noise injection is naturally connected to the action of the heat kernel. This provides indications on the relevance domain of traditional Taylor expansions and shows the dependence of the quality of Taylor approximations on global smoothness properties of neural networks under consideration. The connection between noise injection and heat kernel also enables controlling the fluctuations of the random perturbed cost function. Under the global smoothness assumption, tools from gaussian analysis provide bounds on the tail behavior of the perturbed cost. This finally suggests that mixing input perturbation with smoothness-based penalization might be profitable.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/neco.1997.9.5.1093

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1162/neco.1996.8.3.643 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Auer P., 1996, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 8, 316
  3. 10.1162/neco.1995.7.1.108 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Comon P., 1992, Traitement du Signal, 8, 387
  5. 10.1109/21.370200 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/0890-5401(92)90010-D · DOI
  7. 10.1109/72.105415 · DOI
  8. 10.1162/neco.1995.7.5.974 · DOI
  9. 10.1109/21.155944 · DOI
  10. 10.1109/72.377960 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0893-6080(91)90033-2 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/BF02124746 · DOI
  13. 10.1109/72.286908 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Grandvalet, Y., Canu, S., & Boucheron, S.
Affiliations
  • Université de Technologie de Compiègne (FR)
  • Université Paris-Sud (FR)
Venue
Neural Computation
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
1093-1108
ISSN
  • 0899-7667 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-888X
OpenAlex
W1964929969
Cited by
147
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Neural Computation (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institute for Scientific Interchange
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
Keywords
noise injection, neural network training, generalization, heat kernel, Gaussian perturbation, Taylor series expansion, global smoothness, Gaussian analysis, tail bounds, input perturbation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review