The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Virtual Worlds as Fuzzy Cognitive Maps
Abstract
Fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM) can structure virtual worlds that change with time. An FCM links causal events, actors, values, goals, and trends in a fuzzy feedback dynamical system. An FCM lists the fuzzy rules or causal flow paths that relate events. It can guide actors in a virtual world as the actors move through a web of cause and effect and react to events and to other actors. Experts draw FCM causal pictures of the virtual world. They do not write down differential equations to change the virtual world. Complex FCMs can give virtual worlds with “new” or chaotic equilibrium behavior. Simple FCMs give virtual worlds with periodic behavior. They map input states to limit-cycle equilibria. An FCM limit cycle repeats a sequence of events or a chain of actions and responses. Limit cycles can control the steady-state rhythms and patterns in a virtual world. In nested FCMs each causal concept can control its own FCM or fuzzy function approximator. This gives levels of fuzzy systems that can choose goals and causal webs as well as move objects and guide actors in the webs. FCM matrices sum to give a combined FCM virtual world for any number of knowledge sources. Adaptive FCMs change their fuzzy causal web as causal patterns change and as actors act and experts state their causal knowledge. Neural learning laws change the causal rules and the limit cycles. Actors learn new patterns and reinforce old ones. In complex FCMs the user can choose the dynamical structure of the virtual world from a spectrum that ranges from mildly to wildly nonlinear. We use a simple but adaptive FCM to model an undersea virtual world of dolphins, fish, and sharks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kosko, B. (1986) · International Journal of Man-Machine Studies · doi:10.1016/s0020-7373(86)80040-2 · Cited by 3,576
Self-citation
Cited by
A Review of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps Research During the Last Decade
Papageorgiou, E. I., & Salmeron, J. L. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems · doi:10.1109/tfuzz.2012.2201727 · Cited by 522
Mkhitaryan, S., Giabbanelli, P. J., de Vries, N. K., & Crutzen, R. (2020) · Intelligence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ibmed.2020.100008 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Dickerson, J. A., & Kosko, B.
- Venue
- Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
- Publisher
- MIT Press - Journals
- Published
- 1994-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 173-189
- ISSN
- 1054-7460 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W338388561
- Cited by
- 426
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Virtual Worlds as Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/pres.1994.3.2.173
- The paper
- Dickerson, J. A., & Kosko, B. (1994). Virtual Worlds as Fuzzy Cognitive Maps. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1994.3.2.173
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.