The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What Comes to Mind
Open accessAbstract
We present a model of intuitive inference, called “local thinking,” in which an agent combines data received from the external world with information retrieved from memory to evaluate a hypothesis. In this model, selected and limited recall of information follows a version of the representativeness heuristic. The model can account for some of the evidence on judgment biases, including conjunction and disjunction fallacies, but also for several anomalies related to demand for insurance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics
Kahneman, D. (2003) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/000282803322655392 · Cited by 5,377
Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1972) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90016-3 · Cited by 4,851
A model of investor sentiment /
Barberis, N., Vishny, R. W., Shleifer, A., & Research., N. B. O. E. (1997) · University of Michigan Library Repository · Cited by 4,013
Self-citationJudgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1978) · Uncertainty in Economics · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-214850-7.50008-5 · Cited by 2,062
The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns
Popkin, S. L. (1991) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226772875.001.0001 · Cited by 1,874
The weighing of evidence and the determinants of confidence
Griffin, D., & Tversky, A. (1992) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(92)90013-r · Cited by 1,841
Support theory: a nonextensional representation of subjective probability
Tversky, A., & Koehler, D. J. (1994) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.101.4.547 · Cited by 1,167
First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias
Rabin, M., & Schrag, J. L. (1999) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.1162/003355399555945 · Cited by 1,001
Interpretation by Physicians of Clinical Laboratory Results
Casscells, W., Schoenberger, A., & Graboys, T. B. (1978) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197811022991808 · Cited by 755
Stewart, N., Chater, N., & Brown, G. D. A. (2006) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.10.003 · Cited by 737
Cited by
Do Investors Care about Carbon Risk?
Bolton, P., & Kacperczyk, M. (2021) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2021.05.008 · Cited by 3,380
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2021) · The Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/hhaa071 · Cited by 1,136
Ilhan, E., Sautner, Z., & Vilkov, G. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3204420 · Cited by 1,136
Diagnostic Expectations and Credit Cycles
BORDALO, P., GENNAIOLI, N., & SHLEIFER, A. (2018) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/jofi.12586 · Cited by 608
Self-citationOverreaction in Macroeconomic Expectations
Bordalo, P., Gennaioli, N., Ma, Y., & Shleifer, A. (2020) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20181219 · Cited by 608
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A.
- Venue
- The Quarterly Journal of Economics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-11-01
- Volume
- 125
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1399-1433
- ISSN
- 0033-5533 (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4650
- OpenAlex
- W2239666518
- Cited by
- 435
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 8.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What Comes to Mind. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1399
- The paper
- Gennaioli, N., & Shleifer, A. (2010). What Comes to Mind. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2010.125.4.1399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
