CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 207Culture, Economy, and Development StudiesHistorical Economic and Social StudiesEconomic Growth and Productivity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Colonialism and Modern Income: Islands as Natural Experiments

Feyrer, James, Sacerdote, Bruce·2009·Review of Economics and Statistics
DOI 10.1162/rest.91.2.245
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Using a new database of islands throughout the Atlantic, Pacific, and Indian Oceans we find a robust positive relationship between the number of years spent as a European colony and current GDP per capita. We argue that the nature of discovery and colonization of islands provides random variation in the length and type of colonial experience. We instrument for length of colonization using variation in prevailing wind patterns. We argue that wind speed and direction had a significant effect on historical colonial rule but do not have a direct effect on GDP today. The data also suggest that years as a colony after 1700 are more beneficial than earlier years. We also find a discernable pecking order among the colonial powers, with years under U.S., British, French, and Dutch rule having more beneficial effects than Spanish or Portuguese rule. Our finding of a strong connection between modern income and years of colonization is conditional on being colonized at all since each of the islands in our data set spent some time under colonial rule.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/rest.91.2.245

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 52 references

1 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Iyer Lakshmi, 2005, Harvard Business School working paper, 041

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–201 of 201

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Feyrer, J., & Sacerdote, B.
Affiliations
Dartmouth College (US)
ORCID
Venue
Review of Economics and Statistics
Publisher
MIT Press - Journals
Published
2009-05
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
245-262
ISSN
  • 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9142
DOI
10.1162/rest.91.2.245
OpenAlex
W2045581984
Cited by
207
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
31.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Review of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Development › Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
Keywords
colonialism, economic development, GDP per capita, natural experiment, prevailing winds, wind speed and direction, colonial power

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review