Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 158Family Dynamics and RelationshipsGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsDemographic Trends and Gender Preferences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Are Children “Normal”?

Open access
Black, Dan A., Kolesnikova, Natalia, Sanders, Seth G., Taylor, Lowell J.·2013·Review of Economics and Statistics

Abstract

We examine Becker's (1960) contention that children are "normal." For the cross section of non-Hispanic white married couples in the U.S., we show that when we restrict comparisons to similarly-educated women living in similarly-expensive locations, completed fertility is positively correlated with the husband's income. The empirical evidence is consistent with children being "normal." In an effort to show causal effects, we analyze the localized impact on fertility of the mid-1970s increase in world energy prices - an exogenous shock that substantially increased men's incomes in the Appalachian coal-mining region. Empirical evidence for that population indicates that fertility increases in men's income.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/rest_a_00257

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Angrist Joshua D, 1998, American Economic Review, 88, 450
  2. 10.2307/2228949 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1086/260166 · DOI
  4. 10.2307/2060813 · DOI
  5. 10.1257/000282802760015595 · DOI
  6. 10.1006/juec.2001.2237 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/S0047-2727(02)00014-2 · DOI
  8. 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2005.00996.x · DOI
  9. 10.1198/016214503000000369 · DOI
  10. Blake Judith, 1968, Population Studies, 22, 5
  11. 10.2307/2061527 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.jue.2008.05.005 · DOI
  13. 10.1080/01621459.1941.10500587 · DOI
  14. 10.2307/2938322 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.2307/1911843 · DOI
  16. Jones Larry, 2006, NBER working paper, 12796
  17. 10.1353/jhr.2010.0012 · DOI
  18. 10.1086/261120 · DOI
  19. 10.1086/261353 · DOI
  20. 10.1086/259013 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2008.08.002 · DOI
  22. 10.1086/260152 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.2307/2339550 · DOI

Cited by

See all 158

Metadata

Authors
Black, D. A., Kolesnikova, N., Sanders, S. G., & Taylor, L. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Chicago (US)
  • University of Mississippi (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • National Opinion Research Center (US)
Venue
Review of Economics and Statistics
Publisher
MIT Press
Published
2013-03
Volume
95
Issue
1
Pages
21-33
ISSN
  • 0034-6535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-9142
OpenAlex
W3122987699
Cited by
158
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3
FWCI
12.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Review of Economics and Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD065563, R21HD069778, R24HD065563)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences
Keywords
fertility, completed fertility, energy prices, coal mining, Appalachia, married couples, non-Hispanic white women

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.