Why does surprisal from larger transformer-based language models provide a poorer fit to human reading times?
Open accessAbstract
This work presents a linguistic analysis into why larger Transformer-based pre-trained language models with more parameters and lower perplexity nonetheless yield surprisal estimates that are less predictive of human reading times. First, regression analyses show a strictly monotonic, positive log-linear relationship between perplexity and fit to reading times for the more recently released five GPT-Neo variants and eight OPT variants on two separate datasets, replicating earlier results limited to just GPT-2 (Oh et al., 2022). Subsequently, analysis of residual errors reveals a systematic deviation of the larger variants, such as underpredicting reading times of named entities and making compensatory overpredictions for reading times of function words such as modals and conjunctions. These results suggest that the propensity of larger Transformer-based models to ‘memorize’ sequences during training makes their surprisal estimates diverge from humanlike expectations, which warrants caution in using pre-trained language models to study human language processing.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLMs show superhuman performance on next-word prediction.
“show superhuman performance on next-word prediction [6]”
From Dissociating language and thought in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [6]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · see citing works
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318 · see citing works
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486 · see citing works
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using <b>lme4</b>
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01 · Cited by 86,835 · see citing works
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder–Decoder for Statistical Machine Translation
Cho, K., van Merrienboer, B., Gulcehre, C., Bahdanau, D., Bougares, F., Schwenk, H., & Bengio, Y. (2014) · Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.3115/v1/d14-1179 · Cited by 25,545 · see citing works
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 29
Teymur, O., Zygalakis, K., & Calderhead, B. (2016) · Cited by 13,881 · see citing works
DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lighter
Sanh, V., Debut, L., Chaumond, J., & Wolf, T. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.01108 · Cited by 4,653 · see citing works
Expectation-based syntactic comprehension
Lévy, R. (2007) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.006 · Cited by 2,220 · see citing works
A probabilistic earley parser as a psycholinguistic model
Hale, J. (2001) · Second meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Language technologies 2001 - NAACL '01 · doi:10.3115/1073336.1073357 · Cited by 1,150 · see citing works
Neural Machine Translation of Rare Words with Subword Units
Sennrich, R., Haddow, B., & Birch, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/p16-1162 · Cited by 974 · see citing works
The Dependency Locality Theory: A Distance-Based Theory of Linguistic Complexity
Gibson, E. A. F. (2001) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/3654.003.0008 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension
Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Dyke, J. A. V. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.007 · Cited by 854 · see citing works
The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic
Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013 · Cited by 725 · see citing works
Data from eye-tracking corpora as evidence for theories of syntactic processing complexity
Demberg, V., & Keller, F. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.07.008 · Cited by 572 · see citing works
Recurrent Neural Network Grammars
Dyer, C., Kuncoro, A., Ballesteros, M., & Smith, N. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/n16-1024 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
The neural architecture of language: Integrative modeling converges on predictive processing
Schrimpf, M., Blank, I. A., Tuckute, G., Kauf, C., Hosseini, E. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2105646118 · Cited by 517 · see citing works
GPT-NeoX-20B: An Open-Source Autoregressive Language Model
Black, S., Biderman, S., Hallahan, E., Anthony, Q. G., Gao, L., Golding, L., He, H., Leahy, C., McDonell, K., Phang, J., et al. (2022) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.bigscience-1.9 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
GPT-Neo: Large Scale Autoregressive Language Modeling with Mesh-Tensorflow
Black, S., Leo, G., Wang, P., Leahy, C., & Biderman, S. (2021) · Zenodo · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5297715 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
fMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension
Shain, C., Blank, I. A., van Schijndel, M., Schuler, W., & Fedorenko, E. (2020) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107307 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citationImage, language, brain : papers from the First Mind Articulation Project Symposium
Marantz, A., 宮下, 保., & O'Neil, W. A. (2000) · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models
Carlini, N., Ippolito, D., Jagielski, M., Lee, K., Tramer, F., & Zhang, C. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.07646 · Cited by 204 · see citing works
Predictive power of word surprisal for reading times is a linear function of language model quality
Goodkind, A., & Bicknell, K. (2018) · Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-0102 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
Proceedings of the 21st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
Sturt, P., Branigan, H. P., & Matsumoto-Sturt, Y. (1999) · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Distributed Representations, Simple Recurrent Networks, and Grammatical Structure
Elman, J. L. (1991) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-4008-3_5 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Finding syntax in human encephalography with beam search
Hale, J., Dyer, C., Kuncoro, A., & Brennan, J. (2018) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/p18-1254 · Cited by 138 · see citing works
On the Predictive Power of Neural Language Models for Human Real-Time Comprehension BehaviorPreprint
Wilcox, E., Gauthier, J., Hu, J., Qian, P., & Lévy, R. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2006.01912 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Human Sentence Processing: Recurrence or Attention?
Merkx, D., & Frank, S. L. (2021) · Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.cmcl-1.2 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Single‐Stage Prediction Models Do Not Explain the Magnitude of Syntactic Disambiguation Difficulty
van Schijndel, M., & Linzen, T. (2021) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12988 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
A resource-rational model of human processing of recursive linguistic structure
Hahn, M., Futrell, R., Lévy, R., & Gibson, E. A. F. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2122602119 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
ERP indexes of functional differences in brain activation during proper and common names retrieval
Proverbio, A. M., Lilli, S., Semenza, C., & Zani, A. (2001) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(01)00003-3 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Futrell, R., Gibson, E. A. F., Tily, H. J., Blank, I., Vishnevetsky, A., Piantadosi, S. T., & Fedorenko, E. G. (2020) · Language Resources and Evaluation · doi:10.1007/s10579-020-09503-7 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Lower Perplexity is Not Always Human-Like
Kuribayashi, T., Oseki, Y., Ito, T., Yoshida, R., Asahara, M., & Inui, K. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.405 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Comparison of Structural Parsers and Neural Language Models as Surprisal Estimators
Oh, B.-D., Clark, C., & Schuler, W. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.777963 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Self-citationHao, Y., Mendelsohn, S., Sterneck, R., Martinez, R., & Frank, R. (2020) · Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.cmcl-1.10 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
Accurate Unbounded Dependency Recovery using Generalized Categorial Grammars
Nguyen, L. V., van Schijndel, M., & Schuler, W. (2012) · International Conference on Computational Linguistics · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Self-citationContext Limitations Make Neural Language Models More Human-Like
Kuribayashi, T., Oseki, Y., Brassard, A., & Inui, K. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.712 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Ryu, S. H., & Lewis, R. L. (2021) · Workshop on Cognitive Modeling and Computational Linguistics (CMCL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.cmcl-1.6 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Arehalli, S., Dillon, B., & Linzen, T. (2022) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.conll-1.20 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Aurnhammer, C., & Frank, S. L. (2018) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/wec74 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Continuous-time deconvolutional regression for psycholinguistic modeling
Shain, C., & Schuler, W. (2021) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104735 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationRelative Importance in Sentence Processing
Hollenstein, N., & Beinborn, L. (2021) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-short.19 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Recognizing the emotional valence of names: An ERP study
Wang, L., Zhu, Z., BASTIAANSEN, M. C. M., Peter Hagoort, A., & Yang, Y. (2013) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.006 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Surprisal Estimators for Human Reading Times Need Character Models
Oh, B.-D., Clark, C., & Schuler, W. (2021) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.290 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Self-citationOh, B.-D., & Schuler, W. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.11185 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Self-citationOPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models
Zhang, S., Roller, S., Goyal, N., Artetxe, M., Chen, M., Chen, S., Dewan, C., Diab, M., Li, X., Lin, X. V., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.01068
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 51 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Christian Clark and William Schuler. 2022. Ev- idence for composition operations in broad- coverage sentence processing. In 35th Annual Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
- Philip N. Johnson-Laird. 1983. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness. Harvard Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Alan Kennedy, Robin Hill, and Joël Pynte. 2003. The Dundee Corpus. In Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Eye Movement.
- Soo Hyun Ryu and Richard L. Lewis. 2022. Using Transformer language model to integrate sur- prisal, entropy, and working memory retrieval accounts of sentence processing. In 35th Annual Conference on Human Sentence Processing.
- Cory Shain, Marten van Schijndel, and William Schuler. 2018. Deep syntactic annotations for broad-coverage psycholinguistic modeling. In Workshop on Linguistic and Neuro-Cognitive Resources.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dissociating language and thought in large language models
Mahowald, K., Ivanova, A. A., Blank, I. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2024.01.011 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Testing the Predictions of Surprisal Theory in 11 Languages
Wilcox, E., Pimentel, T., Meister, C., Cotterell, R., & Lévy, R. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00612 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Language in Brains, Minds, and Machines
Tuckute, G., Kanwisher, N., & Fedorenko, E. G. (2024) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-120623-101142 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Hosseini, E. A., Schrimpf, M., Zhang, Y., Bowman, S., Zaslavsky, N., & Fedorenko, E. (2024) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00137 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Huang, K., Arehalli, S., Kugemoto, M., Muxica, C., Prasad, G., Dillon, B., & Linzen, T. (2023) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2024.104510 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
On the Effect of Anticipation on Reading Times
Pimentel, T., Meister, C., Wilcox, E., Lévy, R., & Cotterell, R. (2023) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00603 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Wong, R., Reichle, E. D., & Veldre, A. (2024) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-024-02588-z · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Clinical efficacy of pre-trained large language models through the lens of aphasia
Cong, Y., LaCroix, A. N., & Lee, J. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-66576-y · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Covert Prompt Transmission for Secure Large Language Model Services
Zhang, R., Liu, Y., Tang, S., Wang, J., Niyato, D. T., Sun, G., Li, Y., & Sun, S. (2025) · IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications · doi:10.1109/jsac.2025.3647412 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
The Plausibility of Sampling as an Algorithmic Theory of Sentence Processing
Hoover, J. L., Sonderegger, M., Piantadosi, S. T., & O’Donnell, T. J. (2023) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00086 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
de Varda, A. G., Marelli, M., & Amenta, S. (2023) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-023-02261-8 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Scaling in Cognitive Modelling: a Multilingual Approach to Human Reading Times
de Varda, A. G., & Marelli, M. (2023) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.acl-short.14 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Dense and Disconnected: Analyzing the Sedimented Style of ChatGPT-Generated Text at Scale
Markey, B., Brown, D. W., Laudenbach, M., & Kohler, A. (2024) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/07410883241263528 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Oh, B.-D., & Schuler, W. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.128 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Self-citationDriving and suppressing the human language network using large language modelsPreprint
Tuckute, G., Sathe, A., Srikant, S., Taliaferro, M., Wang, M., Schrimpf, M., Kay, K., & Fedorenko, E. G. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.04.16.537080 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Distributional Semantics: Meaning Through Culture and Interaction
Contreras Kallens, P., & Christiansen, M. H. (2025) · Topics in Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/tops.12771 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Language models outperform cloze predictability in a cognitive model of reading
Rego, A. T. L., Snell, J., & Meeter, M. (2024) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012117 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Got It! Prompting Readability Using ChatGPT to Enhance Academic Texts for Diverse Learning Needs
Hedlin, E., Estling, L., Wong, J., Epp, C. D., & Viberg, O. (2025) · International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK) · doi:10.1145/3706468.3706483 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Huang, K., Arehalli, S., Kugemoto, M., Muxica, C., Prasad, G., Dillon, B., & Linzen, T. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/z38u6 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Words, Subwords, and Morphemes: What Really Matters in the Surprisal-Reading Time Relationship?
Nair, S., & Resnik, P. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.752 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
The Linearity of the Effect of Surprisal on Reading Times across Languages
Xu, W., Chon, J., Liu, T., & Futrell, R. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.1052 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Modeling Brain Representations of Words' Concreteness in Context Using GPT‐2 and Human Ratings
Bruera, A., Tao, Y., Anderson, A. J., Çokal, D., Haber, J., & Poesio, M. (2023) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.13388 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Bigger is not always better: The importance of human-scale language modeling for psycholinguistics
Wilcox, E. G., Hu, M. Y., Mueller, A., Warstadt, A., Choshen, L., Zhuang, C., Williams, A., Cotterell, R., & Linzen, T. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104650 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Language Model Quality Correlates with Psychometric Predictive Power in Multiple Languages
Wilcox, E., Meister, C., Cotterell, R., & Pimentel, T. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.466 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Chang, T. A., Tu, Z., & Bergen, B. K. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00708 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Structural Priming Demonstrates Abstract Grammatical Representations in Multilingual Language Models
Michaelov, J. A., Arnett, C., Chang, T. A., & Bergen, B. K. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.227 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Expert-adapted language models improve the fit to reading times
Škrjanec, I., Broy, F. Y., & Demberg, V. (2023) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2023.10.344 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Information Value: Measuring Utterance Predictability as Distance from Plausible Alternatives
Giulianelli, M., Wallbridge, S., & Fernández, R. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.343 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
On the limits of LLM surprisal as a functional explanation of the N400 and P600
Krieger, B., Brouwer, H., Aurnhammer, C., & Crocker, M. W. (2025) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2025.149841 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Large Language Models Are Human-Like Internally
Kuribayashi, T., Oseki, Y., Taieb, S. B., Inui, K., & Baldwin, T. (2025) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl.a.58 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Are Language Models Sensitive to Semantic Attraction? A Study on Surprisal
Cong, Y., Chersoni, E., Hsu, Y.-Y., & Lenci, A. (2023) · Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.starsem-1.13 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
On the influence of discourse connectives on the predictions of humans and language models
Britton, J., Cong, Y., Hsu, Y.-Y., Chersoni, E., & Blache, P. (2024) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2024.1363120 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Expectations modulate retrieval interference during ellipsis resolution
Tung, T.-Y., & Brennan, J. (2023) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2023.108680 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Memory for prediction: A Transformer-based theory of sentence processing
Ryu, S. H., & Lewis, R. L. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104670 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Constraint satisfaction in large language models
Jacobs, C. L., & MacDonald, M. C. (2024) · Language Cognition and Neuroscience · doi:10.1080/23273798.2024.2364339 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Informativity enhances memory robustness against interference in sentence comprehension
Xu, W., & Futrell, R. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2024.104603 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Rambelli, G., Chersoni, E., Senaldi, M. S. G., Blache, P., & Lenci, A. (2023) · Workshop on Multiword Expressions (MWE) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.mwe-1.13 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Steuer, J., Mosbach, M., & Klakow, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the BabyLM Challenge at the 27th Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.12 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Filtered Corpus Training (FiCT) Shows that Language Models Can Generalize from Indirect Evidence
Patil, A., Jumelet, J., Chiu, Y. Y., Lapastora, A., Shen, P. S., Wang, L., Willrich, C., & Steinert‐Threlkeld, S. (2024) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00720 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Wang, W., Chen, L., & Perfetti, C. A. (2025) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2025.105667 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Humans and language models diverge when predicting repeating text
Vaidya, A. R., Turek, J. S., & Huth, A. G. (2023) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-1.5 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Category Locality Theory: A unified account of locality effects in sentence comprehension
Isono, S. (2024) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105766 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Bruera, A., & Poesio, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0291099 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Boeve, S., & Bogaerts, L. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02774-4 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Neural Networks as Cognitive Models of the Processing of Syntactic Constraints
Arehalli, S., & Linzen, T. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00137 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Language models that match reader experience are better predictors of reading times
Škrjanec, I., & Demberg, V. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104677 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Schepens, J. J., Woloszyn, H., Marx, N., & Gagl, B. (2025) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi.a.30 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
A predictive coding model for online sentence processing
Ohams, C., Nair, S., Bhattasali, S., & Resnik, P. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104705 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
When Language Models Fall in Love: Animacy Processing in Transformer Language Models
Hanna, M., Belinkov, Y., & Pezzelle, S. (2023) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.744 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
On the Mathematical Relationship Between Contextual Probability and N400 Amplitude
Michaelov, J. A., & Bergen, B. K. (2024) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi_a_00150 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Neural processing of children’s theory of mind in a naturalistic story-listening paradigm
Yu, C., Eggleston, R. L., Zhang, K., Nickerson, N., Sun, X., Marks, R. A., Hu, X., Brennan, J., Wellman, H. M., & Kovelman, I. (2025) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsaf022 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Bolliger, L., Reich, D., & Jäger, L. (2025) · Proc. ACM Hum. Comput. Interact. · doi:10.1145/3725830 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
EMTeC: A corpus of eye movements on machine-generated texts
Bolliger, L. S., Haller, P., Cretton, I. C. R., Reich, D. R., Kew, T., & Jäger, L. A. (2025) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-025-02677-4 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Kaye, N. G., & Gordon, P. C. (2025) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-025-02756-9 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Neural Correlates of Object-Extracted Relative Clause Processing Across English and Chinese
Dunagan, D. G., Stanojević, M., Coavoux, M., Zhang, S., Bhattasali, S., Li, J., Brennan, J., & Hale, J. (2023) · Neurobiology of Language · doi:10.1162/nol_a_00110 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Dissociable frequency effects attenuate as large language model surprisal predictors improve
Oh, B.-D., & Schuler, W. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104645 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citationXu, W., & Futrell, R. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104706 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Can Language Models Trained on Written Monologue Learn to Predict Spoken Dialogue?
Umair, M., Mertens, J. B., Warnke, L., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2024) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70013 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Munich Sentence (MuSe) Database: Completion norms and audio recordings for 619 German sentences
Sterner, E., Stadler, M., & Knolle, F. (2026) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-026-02993-3 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Expert-adapted language models improve the fit to reading timesPreprint
Škrjanec, I., Broy, F. Y., & Demberg, V. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/dc8y6 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Comprehenders' Error Correction Mechanisms Are Finely Calibrated to Language Production Statistics
Qian, P., & Lévy, R. (2026) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.31234/osf.io/e3v5b · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Gao, C., Ma, Z., Chen, J., Li, P., Huang, S., & Li, J. (2024) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2024.08.15.608196 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Sun, K., & Wang, R. (2025) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70092 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Lei, L., & Shi, Y. (2025) · Journal of Quantitative Linguistics · doi:10.1080/09296174.2025.2559597 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Scope interpretation in natural and artificial language processing
Fang, S., He, J., & Liu, X. (2026) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106527 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Better language models better model the N400, but not reading time
Michaelov, J. A., & Bergen, B. K. (2026) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2026.104762 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Kapatsinski, V. M., & Beguš, G. (2026) · Linguistics Vanguard · doi:10.1515/lingvan-2026-0030 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Deng, S., Ding, C., Reich, D. R., Prasse, P., & Jäger, L. A. (2026) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/s13428-026-03118-6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
A surprisal oracle for active curriculum language modeling
Hong, X., Loáiciga, S., & Sayeed, A. (2023) · BabyLM Challenge · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-babylm.22 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Optimizing Predictive Metrics for Human Reading BehaviorPreprint
Sun, K. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.09.03.556078 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
BLiMP-NL: A corpus of Dutch minimal pairs and acceptability judgements for language model evaluationPreprint
Suijkerbuijk, M., Prins, Z., Kloots, M. D. H., Zuidema, W. H., & Frank, S. L. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mhjbx · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Platt, A. L. M. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.10.27.684752 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Beinborn, L., & Hollenstein, N. (2023) · Synthesis lectures on human language technologies · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-43260-6_6
Молнар, А. А., Jumelet, J., Giulianelli, M., & Sinclair, A. (2023) · Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.conll-1.18
Roles of Scaling and Instruction Tuning in Language Perception: Model vs. Human Attention
Gao, C., Huang, S., Li, J., & Chen, J. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.868 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Constraint satisfaction in large language modelsPreprint
Jacobs, C. L., & MacDonald, M. C. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/xfnpb
Large Language Models in Psycholinguistic Studies
Günther, F., & Cassani, G. (2025) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.00749-3 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Schoknecht, P., Paape, D., & Vasishth, S. (2026) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2026.101816
Clark, T. H., Poliak, M., Regev, T. I., Haskins, A. J., Robertson, C. E., & Gibson, E. A. F. (2025) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70134
Regressive Eye Movements in Reading Go from Easy to Difficult WordsPreprint
Rego, A. T. L., Melo, A. N., Snell, J., & Meeter, M. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5405257
Modeling Memory Effects in a Head-Final Language With Category Locality
Isono, S., Kajikawa, K., Oseki, Y., & Asahara, M. (2026) · Open Mind · doi:10.1162/opmi.a.384
Salig, L. K., Yu, C., Leachman, M. A., Purushotham, N. D., Ortiz-Villalobos, V., Flores-Gaona, Z., Negrón, V. V., Girardini, C., Fang, H.-Y., Baron, A., et al. (2026) · Brain and Language · doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2026.105833
Mahesh, P., Tripathi, J., Mary, F. A., Durairaj, M., Bansode, G. S., & Vijayalakshmi, B. A. (2025) · International Conference on NexGen Networks and Cybernetics (IC2NC) · doi:10.1109/ic2nc67409.2025.11376099
Giulianelli, M., Wallbridge, S., Cotterell, R., & Fernández, R. (2026) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104715 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Structural priming in humans and large language models
Sinclair, A., Klimovich‐Gray, A., Jumelet, J., Adamian, N., & Konopka, A. E. (2026) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104713
Information Theory in Translation and Interpreting Studies
Teich, E., Przybyl, H., & Lapshinova‐Koltunski, E. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-95504-1.01583-0
What drives regressions in reading? Insights from surprisal and saliency from language models
Rego, A. T. L., Melo, A. N., Snell, J., & Meeter, M. (2026) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2026.106535
Liang, Y. (2023) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/bf4498a1z8454z4bb4zbf5ez6e4af27e1bc3
Dunagan, D. G., Low, D. S., Yue, S., Meyer, L., & Hale, J. T. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.04.20.719609
Talamo, L., Steuer, J., & Verkerk, A. (2026) · Linguistics · doi:10.1515/ling-2024-0122
Fang, S., Li, Y., & Cong, Y. (2026) · Languages · doi:10.3390/languages11060126
Laubrock, J., & Yan, M. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6986543
“What we found was…” Syntactic prominence cues to information structure affect semantic predictionPreprint
Beier, E. J., Zhou, A., & Ferreira, F. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.6997361
Resnik, P. (2026) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x26104762
Word Predictability as a Measure of Second Language Proficiency
Holmes, L., Crossley, S. A., Morris, W., & Choi, J. S. (2026) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.70037
Bentley, K., & Staub, A. (2026) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/17470218261473201
Linear asymmetries and incremental parsing
Abels, K., & Neeleman, A. (2026) · Language · doi:10.1017/s009785072600010x
Liu, S., & Mei, Y. (2026) · Journal of Intelligence · doi:10.3390/jintelligence14080171
Timkey, W., Huang, K.-J., Oh, B.-D., Prasad, G., Arehalli, S., Linzen, T., & Dillon, B. (2026) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2532230123 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Oh, B.-D., & Schuler, W.
- Affiliations
- The Ohio State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Oh, Byung-Doh
- Schuler, William
- Venue
- Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
- Publisher
- MIT Press
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 336-350
- ISSN
- 2307-387X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4361766487
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 30
- FWCI
- 10.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1816891)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Keywords
- information content, reading time, transformer language models, perplexity, model size, GPT-Neo, OPT, named entities, function words, memorization, human language processing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review