Cited by 517Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismEmbodied and Extended CognitionReading and Literacy Development

The neural architecture of language: Integrative modeling converges on predictive processing

Open access
Schrimpf, Martin, Blank, Idan Asher, Tuckute, Greta, Kauf, Carina, Hosseini, Eghbal A., Kanwisher, Nancy, Tenenbaum, Joshua B., Fedorenko, Evelina·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Significance: Language is a quintessentially human ability. Research has long probed the functional architecture of language in the mind and brain using diverse neuroimaging, behavioral, and computational modeling approaches. However, adequate neurally-mechanistic accounts of how meaning might be extracted from language are sorely lacking. Here, we report a first step toward addressing this gap by connecting recent artificial neural networks from machine learning to human recordings during language processing. We find that the most powerful models predict neural and behavioral responses across different datasets up to noise levels. Models that perform better at predicting the next word in a sequence also better predict brain measurements—providing computationally explicit evidence that predictive processing fundamentally shapes the language comprehension mechanisms in the brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.2105646118

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schrimpf, M., Blank, I. A., Tuckute, G., Kauf, C., Hosseini, E. A., Kanwisher, N., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Fedorenko, E.
Affiliations
  • McGovern Institute for Brain Research (US)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Fedorenko, Evelina
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2021-11-04
Volume
118
Issue
45
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W3210923133
Cited by
517
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 99 · 2025: 120 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 134 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
39.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A. (-)
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Shoemaker fellowship, Media Lab Consortia, Singleton fellowship, Presidential Graduate fellowship, Friends of the McGovern Institute Institute)
  • Semiconductor Research Corporation (C-BRIC)
  • National Science Foundation (NSF STC CCF-1231216)
  • HHS | National Institutes of Health (R01-DC016607, R01-DC016950)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
Keywords
predictive processing, language comprehension, neural architecture, transformer models, integrative modeling, next-word prediction, functional MRI, electrocorticography, model architecture
MeSH terms
Brain, Humans, Language, Models, Neurological, Neural Networks, Computer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review