Cited by 83Paranormal Experiences and BeliefsReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyPhilosophy and Theoretical Science

Dualism Revisited: Body vs. Mind vs. Soul

Richert, Rebekah, Harris, Paul·2008·Journal of Cognition and Culture

Abstract

A large, diverse sample of adults was interviewed about their conception of the ontological and functional properties of the mind as compared to the soul. The existence of the mind was generally tied to the human lifecycle of conception, birth, growth and death, and was primarily associated with cognitive as opposed to spiritual functions. In contrast, the existence of the soul was less systematically tied to the lifecycle and frequently associated with spiritual as opposed to cognitive functions. Participants were also asked about three ethical issues: stem cell research, life support for patients in a persistent vegetative state and cloning. As expected, participants' beliefs about the ontology and function of the soul were linked to their judgments about these ethical issues whereas their beliefs about the mind were unrelated. Overall, the findings show that many adults do not espouse a simple body-mind dualism, and any tendency toward such dualism is unlikely to explain their beliefs in an afterlife. Instead, afterlife beliefs appear to be associated with the idea of an immaterial essence, potentially dissociable from the biology of life and death.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156770908x289224

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rebekah Richert and Paul Harris (2008) provide cross-cultural evidence suggesting the prevalence of a tripartite (body-mind-soul) model of the self, rather than simple mind-body dualism.

    “Rebekah Richert and Paul Harris (2008), for instance, provide a variety of cross-cultural evidence suggesting the prevalence of a tripartite (body -mind -soul) model of the self, rather than simple mind -body dualism.”

    From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Richert and Harris 2008

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Richert, R., & Harris, P.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Riverside (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Published
2008
Volume
8
Issue
1-2
Pages
99-115
ISSN
  • 1567-7095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5373
OpenAlex
W1982858132
Cited by
83
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
3.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cognition and Culture (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Paranormal Experiences and Beliefs
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Keywords
mind-body dualism, soul, mind, afterlife beliefs, ontology of mind, spiritual beliefs, cognitive function, stem cell research, persistent vegetative state, cloning, moral judgment, life cycle

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review