Cited by 20Indian and Buddhist StudiesStudy and Philosophy of ReligionReligious Studies and Spiritual Practices

The Protective Buddha: On the Cosmological Logic of Paritta

Shulman, Eviatar·2019·Numen

Abstract

Paritta — ritual chanting — is a central institution in Theravāda Buddhism, with deep roots in all historical forms of Buddhism in Asia. Nevertheless, no study provides a convincing framework for how the protective potency of the Buddha and his words is understood. Earlier strands of scholarship highlighted the psychological aspects of ritual chanting that were thought to have a positive effect on participants. Later scholars emphasized the role of paritta in the training of monks. These studies do not explain “how paritta works,” that is, for example, why, according to the views encapsulated in the texts themselves, bringing the Buddha to mind can act against demons or change reality. This article offers a close reading of the central texts of the genre in order to conceptualize the metaphysical understanding they employ. It thus provides insights regarding the unique ontological position and cosmological function of the Buddha according to the texts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/15685276-12341533

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Jinapañjaragāthā is a creative reworking of Buddhist protective chants that emerged from originally canonical contexts, with many classic paritta texts still chanted today found in the Sutta-piṭaka.

    “This text is a dense, living, excitingly creative reworking and advancement of Buddhist protective chants that emerged from contexts that were at first canonical, with many classic paritta (protective) texts that are still chanted today being found in the Sutta-piṭaka, the Basket of Discourses (Shulman 2019).”

    From Performing Theravāda: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Shulman 2019

  • Shulman notes there is frequently a self-reflexive sense of the power of the text itself in paritta texts.

    “Shulman notes there is frequently a self-reflexive sense of the power of the text itself.”

    From Reciting Buddhist Texts: Long Suttas of the Dīghanikāya in Performance (2024) · cites this paper as Shulman 2019: 218-222

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Shulman, E.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Shulman, Eviatar
Venue
Numen
Published
2019-04-11
Volume
66
Issue
2-3
Pages
207-242
ISSN
  • 0029-5973 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5276
OpenAlex
W2941093190
Cited by
20
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 1
FWCI
34.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Numen (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices
Keywords
Theravada Buddhism, Buddha, cosmology, metaphysics, demons, Buddhist cosmology, Buddhist ritual texts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review