Cited by 357Language and cultural evolutionChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentCategorization, perception, and language

Spreading Non-natural Concepts: The Role of Intuitive Conceptual Structures in Memory and Transmission of Cultural Materials

Barrett, Justin, Nyhof, Melanie·2001·Journal of Cognition and Culture

Abstract

The four experiments presented support Boyer's theory that counterintuitive concepts have transmission advantages that account for the commonness and ease of communicating many non-natural cultural concepts. In Experiment 1, 48 American college students recalled expectation-violating items from culturally unfamiliar folk stories better than more mundane items in the stories. In Experiment 2, 52 American college students in a modified serial reproduction task transmitted expectation-violating items in a written narrative more successfully than bizarre or common items. In Experiments 3 and 4, these findings were replicated with orally presented and transmitted stimuli, and found to persist even after three months. To sum, concepts with single expectation-violating features were more successfully transmitted than concepts that were entirely congruent with category-level expectations, even if they were highly unusual or bizarre. This transmission advantage for counterintuitive concepts may explain, in part, why such concepts are so prevalent across cultures and so readily spread.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156853701300063589

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Too many violations can lead to confusion as the audience struggles to understand even basic story features.

    “Equally, too many violations can lead to confusion as the audience struggles to understand even basic story features (Barrett & Nyhof, 2001).”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Barrett & Nyhof, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, J., & Nyhof, M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognition and Culture
Published
2001
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
69-100
ISSN
  • 1567-7095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5373
OpenAlex
W2037408089
Cited by
357
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 12
FWCI
241.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognition and Culture (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Categorization, perception, and language
Keywords
counterintuitive concepts, cultural transmission, folk tales, expectancy violation, serial reproduction, oral transmission, cultural universals, Boyer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review