Cited by 769Language, Metaphor, and CognitionReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyStudy and Philosophy of Religion

Conceptualizing a Nonnatural Entity: Anthropomorphism in God Concepts

Open access
Barrett, Justin L., Keil, Frank C.·1996·Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

We investigate the problem of how nonnatural entities are represented by examining university students' concepts of God, both professed theological beliefs and concepts used in comprehension of narratives. In three story processing tasks, subjects often used an anthropomorphic God concept that is inconsistent with stated theological beliefs; and drastically distorted the narratives without any awareness of doing so. By heightening subjects' awareness of their theological beliefs, we were able to manipulate the degree of anthropomorphization. This tendency to anthropomorphize may be generalizable to other agents. God (and possibly other agents) is unintentionally anthropomorphized in some contexts, perhaps as a means of representing poorly understood nonnatural entities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/cogp.1996.0017

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minds never free themselves entirely from their mortal coil: the dead continue to be imagined as possessing ethereal bodies resembling those they possessed in life, as well as being subject to physical limitations typically imposed by bodies.

    “In a similar fashion, minds never free themselves entirely from their mortal coil: the dead continue to be imagined as possessing ethereal bodies resembling those they ' possessed ' in life, as well as being subject to the sorts of physical limitations typically imposed by bodies. 39”
  • Minds never free themselves entirely from their mortal coil: the dead continue to be imagined as possessing ethereal bodies resembling those they possessed in life, as well as being subject to physical limitations typically imposed by bodies.

    “In a similar fashion, minds never free themselves entirely from their mortal coil: the dead continue to be imagined as possessing ethereal bodies resembling those they ' possessed ' in life, as well as being subject to the sorts of physical limitations typically imposed by bodies. 39”

    From Body and Mind in Early China: An Integrated Humanities–Science Approach (2013) · cites this paper as Barrett and Keil 1996

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C.
Affiliations
Cornell University (US)
Venue
Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-12
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
219-247
ISSN
0010-0285 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166757416
Cited by
769
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 14 · 2025: 33 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 32 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 23
FWCI
7.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01-HD23922, R01HD023922)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Language, Metaphor, and Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Study and Philosophy of Religion
Keywords
anthropomorphism, concept of God, theological beliefs, narrative comprehension
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Cognition, Concept Formation, Culture, Humans, Mental Recall, Religion and Psychology, Metaphor, Intuition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review