The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual Differences in Behavioural Reaction To a Changing Environment in Mice and Rats
Open accessAbstract
Aggressive and non-aggressive male mice differ in their reaction to a changing social environment. In order to investigate if this differentiation holds also for non-social situations male mice are trained in a standard maze task, whereafter a change (extramaze and intramaze, respectively) is introduced. The results indicate that aggressive males fulfil their task fairly routine-like and do not react to a change which is in contrast to the non-aggressive individuals. In a second experiment a more continuously changing situation is created by testing the animals every 3 trials in a different maze configuration. In this situation in which a routine cannot be developed c.q. used, the aggressive males performed worse than the non-aggressive animals. It is suggested that the behaviour of aggressive males is mainly controlled by intrinsic factors whereas the behaviour of non-aggressive males is more dependent on external factors. Similar results are obtained when repeating the experiments with rats. This indicates that the relation between aggression and behavioural reaction to a changing environment has more general validity. The possibly underlying mechanism is discussed as well as the consequences for the functioning of the animals in a social setting.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Remembrance of places passed: Spatial memory in rats.
Olton, D. S., & Samuelson, R. J. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes · doi:10.1037//0097-7403.2.2.97 · Cited by 1,998
Artificial selection for short and long attack latencies in wildMus musculus domesticus
van Oortmerssen, G. A., & Bakker, T. C. M. (1981) · Behavior Genetics · doi:10.1007/bf01065622 · Cited by 263
Cited by
Coping styles in animals: current status in behavior and stress-physiology
Koolhaas, J. M., Korte, S. M., De Boer, S. F., Van Der Vegt, B. J., Van Reenen, C. G., Hopster, H., De Jong, I. C., Ruis, M. A. W., & Blokhuis, H. J. (1999) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0149-7634(99)00026-3 · Cited by 2,999
Self-citationCan’t stop, won’t stop: is stereotypy a reliable animal welfare indicator?
Mason, G., & Latham, N. (2004) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s096272860001438x · Cited by 718
Manifestations of chronic and acute stress in dogs
Beerda, B., Schilder, M. B. H., van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., & de Vries, H. W. (1997) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/s0168-1591(96)01131-8 · Cited by 445
Evolutionary emergence of responsive and unresponsive personalities
Wolf, M., van Doorn, G. S., & Weissing, F. J. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805473105 · Cited by 430
Why is there no simple way of measuring animal welfare?
Mason, G., & Mendi, M. (1993) · Animal Welfare · doi:10.1017/s0962728600016092 · Cited by 391
Metadata
- Authors
- Koolhaas, J. M., Benus, R. F., & VAN OORTMERSSEN, G. A.
- Venue
- Behaviour
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1987
- Volume
- 100
- Issue
- 1-4
- Pages
- 105-121
- ISSN
- 0005-7959 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-539X
- OpenAlex
- W2060903321
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual Differences in Behavioural Reaction To a Changing Environment in Mice and Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156853987x00099
- The paper
- Koolhaas, J. M., Benus, R. F., & VAN OORTMERSSEN, G. A. (1987). Individual Differences in Behavioural Reaction To a Changing Environment in Mice and Rats. Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1163/156853987x00099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.