Cited by 79biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesBone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSurgical Sutures and Adhesives

Synthesis and degradation of a tri-component copolymer derived from glycolide, L-lactide, and ε-caprolactone

Cai, Qing, Bei, Jianzhong, Wang, Shenguo·2000·Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition

Abstract

A series of tri-component copolymers was synthesized by ring opening copolymerization of cyclic lactones, i.e. glycolide, L-lactide, and caprolactone, using stannous octoate as a catalyst. Various techniques, including FT-IR, 1H NMR, DSC, X-ray diffraction, tensile strength, and contact angle measurements, were used to elucidate structural characteristics, thermal behavior, mechanical properties, and hydrophilicity of the resulting copolymers. Data showed that the properties of these copolymers could be modulated by adjusting the composition of the copolymers. The DSC and X-ray analysis demonstrated amorphous structures for most of the PGLC copolyesters. The degradation behavior of these PGLC copolymers had been studied in vitro, i.e. in 0.10 M pH 7.4 phosphate buffer solution (PBS). The degradation was monitored by intrinsic viscosity and weight loss measurements. SEM and GPC were also used to monitor the morphology and molecular weight change during degradation. The PGLC copolymers were shown to have variable degradation rates, and most of them could disappear within a few months due to their amorphous structure and low glass transition temperature.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/156856200743698

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cai, Q., Bei, J., & Wang, S.
Affiliations
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Venue
Journal of Biomaterials Science, Polymer Edition
Published
2000-01
Volume
11
Issue
3
Pages
273-288
ISSN
  • 0920-5063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1568-5624
OpenAlex
W2030581217
Cited by
79
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biomaterials Science Polymer Edition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Sutures and Adhesives
Keywords
glycolide, L-lactide, ε-caprolactone, ring-opening copolymerization, stannous octoate catalyst, copolyesters, in vitro degradation, amorphous structure, glass transition temperature, mechanical properties, hydrophilicity, composition-dependent properties
MeSH terms
Biocompatible Materials, Biodegradation, Environmental, Drug Carriers, Humans, Materials Testing, Microscopy, Electron, Scanning, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Polyesters, Polyglycolic Acid, Polymers, Thermodynamics, X-Ray Diffraction, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review