Object recognition: holistic representations in the monkey brain
Abstract
Cognitive-psychological and neuropsychological studies suggest that the human brain processes facial information in a distinct manner, relying on mechanisms that are anatomically and functionally different from those underlying the recognition of other objects. Face recognition, for instance, can be disrupted selectively as a result of localized brain damage, and relies strongly on holistic information rather than on the mere processing of local features. Similarly, in the non-human primate, distinct neocortical and limbic structures have cell populations responding specifically to face stimuli and only weakly to other visual patterns. Moreover, such cells tend to respond to the entire configuration of a face rather than to individual facial features. But are faces the only objects represented in this way? Here I present some evidence suggesting that at least one aspect of facial processing, the processing of holistic information, may be employed by the primate brain when recognizing any arbitrary homogeneous class of even artificial objects, which the monkey has to individually learn, remember, and recognize again and again from among a large number of distractors sharing a number of common features with the target. Acquiring such an expertise can induce configurational selectivity in the response of neurons in the visual system. Our findings suggests that regarding their neural encoding faces are unlikely to be 'special', but they rather are the default 'special class' of the primate visual system.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
IT neurons exhibit learning phenomena, even for essentially arbitrary figures.
“They also exhibit learning phenomena, even for essentially arbitrary figures [41].”
From The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus (2003) · cites this paper as [41]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus
McCandliss, B. D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00134-7 · Cited by 1,489 · see citing works
- Authors
- Logothetis, N.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Logothetis, Nikos
- ORCID
- Logothetis, Nikos
- Venue
- Spatial Vision
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2000
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 165-178
- ISSN
- 0169-1015 (ISSN-L)
- 1568-5683
- OpenAlex
- W1992834379
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Spatial Vision (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
- Keywords
- object recognition, holistic processing, face recognition (cognition), primate visual system, visual expertise, face-selective neurons, visual memory
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Haplorhini, Brain Mapping, Face, Neurophysiology, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Temporal Lobe, Visual Cortex
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review