The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When Whites Flock Together: The Social Psychology of White Habitus
Abstract
Residential and social hypersegregation of whites from blacks furthers a socialization process we refer to as “white habitus.” “White habitus” geographically and psychologically limits whites' chances of developing meaningful relationships with blacks and other minorities. Using data from the 1997 Survey of College Students' Social Attitudes and the 1998 Detroit Area Study on White Racial Ideology to make our case, we show that geographically, whites' segregated lifestyles psychologically leads them to develop positive views about themselves and negative views about racial others. First, we document the high levels of whites' residential and social segregation. Next, we examine how whites interpret their own self-segregation. Finally, we examine how whites' segregation shapes racial expressions, attitudes, cognitions, and even a sense of aesthetics as illustrated by whites' views on the subject of interracial marriage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Noble, C. (1988) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1961794 · Cited by 6,159
The Truly Disadvantaged: The Inner City, The Underclass, and Public Policy.
Watson, B. C., & Wilson, W. J. (1988) · The Journal of Negro Education · doi:10.2307/2295455 · Cited by 5,960
The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love and Outgroup Hate?
Brewer, M. B. (1999) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00126 · Cited by 3,494
White Women, Race Matters: The Social Construction of Whiteness
Frankenburg, R. (1993) · doi:10.4324/9780203973431 · Cited by 3,308
White Privilege: Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack (1989) 1
McIntosh, P. (2019) · On Privilege, Fraudulence, and Teaching As Learning · doi:10.4324/9781351133791-4 · Cited by 2,984
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-3121 · Cited by 2,721
White women, race matters: the social construction of whiteness
(1994) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.31-4085 · Cited by 2,560
Subtractive Schooling: US-Mexican Youth and the Politics of Caring
(2002) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050208667759 · Cited by 2,341
Social Identifications: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes.
Markovsky, B., Hogg, M. A., & Abrams, D. (1990) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2073535 · Cited by 2,339
The Wages of Whiteness: Race and the Making of the American Working Class
Roediger, D. R. (2017) · Class · doi:10.1002/9781119395485.ch4 · Cited by 2,119
Cited by
What Makes Systemic Racism Systemic?
Bonilla‐Silva, E. (2021) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/soin.12420 · Cited by 186
Self-citationAdvancing a sociology of ignorance in the study of racism and racial non‐knowing
Mueller, J. C. (2018) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12600 · Cited by 68
Love Is (Color)blind: Asian Americans and White Institutional Space at the Elite University
Chou, R., Lee, K., & Ho, S. (2015) · Sociology of Race and Ethnicity · doi:10.1177/2332649214553128 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Bonilla-Silva, E., Goar, C., & Embrick, D. G.
- Venue
- Critical Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-03
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2-3
- Pages
- 229-253
- ISSN
- 0896-9205 (ISSN-L)
- 1569-1632
- OpenAlex
- W2168416883
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 52
- FWCI
- 2.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When Whites Flock Together: The Social Psychology of White Habitus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/156916306777835268
- The paper
- Bonilla-Silva, E., Goar, C., & Embrick, D. G. (2006). When Whites Flock Together: The Social Psychology of White Habitus. Critical Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1163/156916306777835268
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.