The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Love Is (Color)blind: Asian Americans and White Institutional Space at the Elite University
Abstract
The literature on racism at the university level is extensive, but few studies have examined the unique position of Asian American undergraduates. Studies of racial discrimination toward Asian Americans remain largely quantitative in nature and few in number. Through rich qualitative data, this article describes how Asian American undergraduates use language to negotiate their social experiences, romantic relationships, and identity at the elite university. It documents various discursive strategies Asian Americans use to cope with and negotiate racialized encounters. Frequent among the participants is the use of a color-blind discourse to describe such experiences. To understand the particular way Asian Americans practice color-blind talk, this article interrogates the intersectionality of race, gender, and sexuality and the specific racialization of this minority group. Further, such analysis reveals a racialized social landscape in higher education that is made more intractable through Asian Americans’ use of color-blind discourse. Finally, the article examines how Asian American undergraduates say they would respond to racism and illustrates discourse as a social practice with the potential to reproduce or resist racism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Individual acts of bigotry are commonplace even in places such as college campuses.
“Studies consistently find that individual acts of bigotry are commonplace, even in places such as college campuses, which one might presume to be more accepting than most other places (Harper and Hurtado 2007; Chou, Lee and Ho 2015).”
From A Critical and Comprehensive Sociological Theory of Race and Racism (2016) · cites this paper as Chou, Lee and Ho 2015
Some Asian/Americans adopt a color-blind discourse that prevents them from articulating the racialized nature of certain social experiences and leaves them unprepared to deal with and process racism.
“One upshot of this proximity to Whiteness is that some Asian/Americans themselves adopt 'a color-blind discourse that prevents them from articulating the racialized nature of certain social experiences... and leaves them unprepared to deal with and process racism' (Chou, Lee, and Ho 2015: 307).”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Chou, Lee, and Ho 2015
Targets of yellow fever feel otherized, separated and held to a different standard.
“Another problem is that targets of yellow fever feel otherized.They are separated and held to a different standard.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Chou, Lee, and Ho 2015
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 42 · Cited by 25
Research works printed but not linked: 31
- 10.1525/sp.2006.53.4.483 · DOI
- 10.2307/2657316 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/08969205020280010501 · DOI
- Bonilla-Silva Eduardo, 2003, Racism without Racists: Color-blind Racism and the Persistence of Racial Inequality in the United States
- 10.1080/0141987042000268530 · DOI
- 10.1525/si.2007.30.3.323 · DOI
- 10.1163/156916306777835268 · DOI
- Chou Rosalind S., 2012, Asian American Sexual Politics: The Construction of Race, Gender, and Sexuality
- Chou Rosalind S., 2008, The Myth of the Model Minority
- Chou Rosalind S., 2014, The Myth of the Model Minority
- 10.1177/0891243205278639 · DOI · Paper page
- Denzin Norman K., 2005, The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research
- Du Bois W. E. B., 1903, The Souls of Black Folks
- 10.1215/9780822381020 · DOI
- Espiritu Yen Le, 2008, Asian American Women and Men: Labor, Laws, and Love
- 10.4324/9780203890646 · DOI
- 10.4324/9780203309506 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0032329299027001005 · DOI
- Moore Wendy L., 2008, Reproducing Racism: White Space, Elite Law Schools, and Racial Inequality
- 10.1525/9780520941045 · DOI
- 10.17953/amer.26.3.g7m2x68764748413 · DOI
- Prasso Sheridan, 2006, The Asian Mystique: Dragon Ladies, Geisha Girls & Our Fantasies of the Exotic Orient
- 10.1177/0044118X03261479 · DOI
- 10.1093/sf/90.1.223 · DOI
- 10.1017/CBO9780511557842 · DOI · Paper page
- Takaki Ronald, 2001, Strangers from a Different Shore: A History of Asian Americans
- Tatum Beverly D., 1997, “Why Are All the Black Kids Sitting Together in the Cafeteria?” and Other Conversations About Race
- Teranishi Robert, 2010, Asians in the Ivory Tower: Dilemmas of Racial Inequality in American Higher Education
- Tong Benson, 1994, Unsubmissive Women: Chinese Prostitutes in Nineteenth-Century San Francisco
- Tuan Mia, 1999, Forever Foreigners or Honorary Whites? The Asian Ethnic Experience
- van Dijk Teun, 2000, Ethnic Minorities and the Media, 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, R., Lee, K., & Ho, S.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- ORCID
- Ho, Simon
- Venue
- Sociology of Race and Ethnicity
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-03-25
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 302-316
- ISSN
- 2332-6492 (ISSN-L)
- 2332-6506
- OpenAlex
- W2312993624
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Sociology of Race and Ethnicity (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Asian American and Pacific Histories
- Keywords
- racial discrimination in higher education, romantic relationships, intersectionality, race, gender, and sexuality, racialization, resistance to racism, elite universities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review