The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Seize the Means of Carbon Removal: The Political Economy of Direct Air Capture
Abstract
The left must confront the politics of removing carbon from the atmosphere – a topic rapidly making its way to the top of the climate agenda. We here examine the technology of direct air capture, tracing its intellectual origins and laying bare the political economy of its current manifestations. We find a space crowded with ideology-laden metaphors, ample fossil-capital entanglements and bold visions for a new, ethereal frontier of capital accumulation. These diversions must be cut short if a technology with the capacity to help repair at least some climate damage is to be of any use. Only socialising the means of removal will allow this to happen.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
'Fossil capital' fetishism has defended nonexistent climate drawdown technologies.
“Finally,”
From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Malm & Carton, 2021
This parochialism leads to adventurist strategy based on political and social actors who can intervene to sabotage ('blow up') those circuits at the point of distribution: the core industrial and petty bourgeois.
“This parochialism leads to adventurist strategy based on political and social actors who can intervene to sabotage (”
From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Malm, 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Process for Capturing CO2 from the Atmosphere
Keith, D. W., Holmes, G., St. Angelo, D., & Heidel, K. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 · Cited by 1,910
The role of CO2 capture and utilization in mitigating climate change
Mac Dowell, N., Fennell, P. S., Shah, N., & Maitland, G. C. (2017) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/nclimate3231 · Cited by 1,321
Lackner, K. S. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1079033 · Cited by 1,290
The trouble with negative emissions
Anderson, K., & Peters, G. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aah4567 · Cited by 1,252
Rapid carbon mineralization for permanent disposal of anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions
Matter, J. M., Stute, M., Snæbjörnsdottir, S. Ó., Oelkers, E. H., Gislason, S. R., Aradottir, E. S., Sigfusson, B., Gunnarsson, I., Sigurdardottir, H., Gunnlaugsson, E., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8132 · Cited by 1,076
CO2 disposal by means of silicates
SEIFRITZ, W. (1990) · Nature · doi:10.1038/345486b0 · Cited by 956
An Overview of the Status and Challenges of CO2 Storage in Minerals and Geological Formations
Kelemen, P., Benson, S. M., Pilorgé, H., Psarras, P., & Wilcox, J. (2019) · Frontiers in Climate · doi:10.3389/fclim.2019.00009 · Cited by 587
Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries
Heck, V., Gerten, D., Lucht, W., & Popp, A. (2018) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y · Cited by 334
The mutual dependence of negative emission technologies and energy systems
Creutzig, F., Breyer, C., Hilaire, J., Minx, J., Peters, G. P., & Socolow, R. (2019) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c8ee03682a · Cited by 217
Research Opportunities for CO2 Utilization and Negative Emissions at the Gigatonne Scale
Majumdar, A., & Deutch, J. (2018) · Joule · doi:10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.018 · Cited by 89
In situ carbon mineralization in ultramafic rocks: natural processes and possible engineered methods
Kelemen, P. B., Aines, R., Bennett, E., Benson, S. M., Carter, E., Coggon, J. A., de Obeso, J. C., Evans, O., Gadikota, G., Dipple, G. M., et al. (2018) · Energy Procedia · doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.013 · Cited by 74
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 94
- Adorno, Theodor 2014 [1966], Negative Dialectics, translated by E.B. Ashton, London: Bloomsbury. 10.4324/9780203479605 · DOI
- Adorno, Theodor 2019 [2008], Philosophical Elements of a Theory of Society, Cambridge: Polity.
- Azar, Christian, Kristian Lindgren, Erik Larson and Kenneth Möllersten 2006, ‘Carbon Capture and Storage from Fossil Fuels and Biomass: Costs and Potential Role in Stabilizing the Atmosphere’, Climatic Change, 74: 47–79. 10.1007/s10584-005-3484-7 · DOI
- Benjamin, Walter 1996, Selected Writings, Volume 1: 1913–1926, edited by Marcus Bullock and Michael W. Jennings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Biro, Andrew (ed.) 2011, Critical Ecologies: The Frankfurt School and Contemporary Environmental Crises, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. 10.3138/9781442661660 · DOI
- Boyd, William, Scott W. Prudham and Rachel A. Schurman 2001, ‘Industrial Dynamics and the Problem of Nature’, Society and Natural Resources, 14: 555–570. 10.1080/08941920120686 · DOI
- Breyer, Christian, Mahdi Fasihi and Arman Aghahosseini 2020, ‘Carbon Dioxide Direct Air Capture for Effective Climate Change Mitigation Based on Renewable Electricity: A New Type of Energy System Sector Coupling’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 25: 43–65. 10.1007/s11027-019-9847-y · DOI
- Bruhn, Thomas, Henriette Naims and Barbara Olfe-Kräutlein 2016, ‘Separating the Debate on CO2 Utilisation from Carbon Capture and Storage’, Environmental Science and Policy, 60: 38–43. 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.001 · DOI
- Carton, Wim 2019, ‘“Fixing” Climate Change by Mortgaging the Future: Negative Emissions, Spatiotemporal Fixes, and the Political Economy of Delay’, Antipode, 51: 750–769. 10.1111/anti.12532 · DOI
- Carton, Wim 2020, ‘Carbon Unicorns and Fossil Futures: Whose Emission Reduction Pathways Is the IPCC Performing?’, in Sapinski, Buck and Malm (eds.) 2020. 10.36019/9781978809390-003 · DOI
- Chichilnisky, Graciela and Peter Eisenberger 2009, ‘Energy Security, Economic Development and Global Warming: Addressing Short and Long Term Challenges’, International Journal of Green Economics, 3: 414–446. 10.1504/IJGE.2009.031333 · DOI
- Eisenberger, Peter M. 2014, ‘Chaos Control: Climate Stabilization by Closing the Global Carbon Cycle’, Energy and Environment, 25: 971–990. 10.1260/0958-305X.25.5.971 · DOI
- Eisenberger, Peter M., Roger W. Cohen, Graciela Chichilnisky et al. 2009, ‘Global Warming and Carbon-Negative Technology: Prospects for a Lower-Cost Route to a Lower-Risk Atmosphere’, Energy and Environment, 20: 973–984. 10.1260/095830509789625374 · DOI
- Elliott, S., K.S. Lackner, H.J. Ziock et al. 2001, ‘Compensation of Atmospheric CO2 Buildup through Engineered Chemical Sinkage’, Geophysical Research Letters, 28: 1235–1238. 10.1029/2000GL011572 · DOI
- Fasihi, Mahdi, Olga Efimova and Christian Breyer 2019, ‘Techno-Economic Assessment of CO2 Direct Air Capture Plants’, Journal of Cleaner Production, 224: 957–980. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.086 · DOI
- Field, Christopher B. and Katharine J. Mach 2017, ‘Rightsizing Carbon Dioxide Removal’, Science, 356: 706–707. 10.1126/science.aam9726 · DOI
- Fogel, Cathleen 2005, ‘Biotic Carbon Sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol: The Construction of Global Knowledge by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, International Environmental Agreements, 5: 191–210. 10.1007/s10784-005-1749-7 · DOI
- Friedlingstein, Pierre, Michael O’Sullivan, Matthew W. Jones et al. 2020, ‘Global Carbon Budget 2020’, Earth System Science Data, 12: 3269–3340. 10.5194/essd-12-3269-2020 · DOI · Paper page
- Gambhir, Ajay and Massimo Tavoni 2019, ‘Direct Air Capture and Sequestration: How It Works and How It Could Contribute to Climate-Change Mitigation’, One Earth, 1: 405–409. 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Goldstein, Jesse 2018, Planetary Improvement: Cleantech Entrepreneurship and the Contradictions of Green Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. 10.7551/mitpress/11478.001.0001 · DOI
- Gov.uk 2020, ‘PM: A New Deal for Britain’, 30 June, available at: <https://www.gov.uk/government/news/pm-a-new-deal-for-britain>. 10.1073/pnas.1108765109 · DOI
- Grasso Macola, Ilaria 2020, ‘Q&A: A Look at Europe’s First Renewable Aviation Fuel Plant with Climeworks’, Airport Technology, 18 June, available at: <https://www.airport-technology.com/features/qa-a-look-at-europes-first-renewable-aviation-fuel-plant-with-climeworks/>. 10.36019/9781978809390-009 · DOI
- Hamilton, Katherine, Ricardo Bayon, Guy Turner and Douglas Higgins 2007, State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2007: Picking up Steam, Ecosystem Marketplace and New Carbon Finance, available at: <https://www.forest-trends.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/State-of-the-Voluntary-Carbon-Market-2007.pdf>. 10.1111/1467-8306.9303007 · DOI
- Hansen, James, Makiko Sato, Pushker Kharecha et al. 2008, ‘Target Atmospheric CO2: Where Should Humanity Aim?’, Open Atmospheric Science Journal, 2: 217–231. 10.2174/1874282300802010217 · DOI
- Hayes, Peter 2001, Industry and Ideology: IG Farben in the Nazi Era, New Edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- House, Kurt Zenz, Antonio C. Baclig, Manya Ranjan et al. 2011, ‘Economic and Energetic Analysis of Capturing CO2 from Ambient Air’, PNAS, 108: 20428–20433. 10.1073/pnas.1012253108 · DOI · Paper page
- ICCINET 2019, ‘Cryosphere 1.5°: Where Urgency and Ambition Meet’, available at: <https://resources.mynewsdesk.com/image/upload/t_attachment/bo0zciloisj4qkiub6ji.pdf>. 10.1038/s41558-017-0045-1 · DOI
- IPCC 2018, Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, Geneva: IPCC. 10.36019/9781978809390-009 · DOI
- Ishimoto, Yuki, Masahiro Sugiyama, Etsushi Kato et al. 2017, ‘Putting Costs of Direct Air Capture in Context’, Forum for Climate Engineering Assessment, FCEA Working Paper Series, No. 2, available at: <http://ceassessment.org/wp-content/uploads//06/WPS-DAC.pdf>. · DOI · Paper page
- Jacobson, Mark Z. 2019, ‘The Health and Climate Impacts of Carbon Capture and Direct Air Capture’, Energy and Environmental Science, 12: 3567–3574. 10.1039/C9EE02709B · DOI
- Jones, Lee 2015, Societies under Siege: Exploring How International Sanctions (Do Not) Work, Oxford: Oxford University Press. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198749325.001.0001 · DOI
- Jones, Michael B. and Fabrizio Albanito 2020, ‘Can Biomass Supply Meet the Demand of BECCS?’, Global Change Biology, online first. 10.4324/9780203479605 · DOI
- Kang, Minsoo 2011, Sublime Dreams of Living Machines: The Automaton in the European Imagination, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Keith, David 2009, ‘Why Capture CO2 from the Atmosphere?’, Science, 325: 1654–1655. 10.1126/science.1175680 · DOI
- Keith, David W., Minh Ha-Duong and Joshua K. Stolaroff 2006, ‘Climate Strategy with CO2 Capture from the Air’, Climatic Change, 74: 17–45. 10.1007/s10584-005-9026-x · DOI
- Kobayashi-Solomon, Erik 2019a, ‘A Historic Inflection Point in Capitalism’s Battle against Climate Change’, Forbes, 29 April, available at: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkobayashisolomon/2019/04/26/historic-inflection-point-mankinds-battle-against-climate-change/>. 10.1126/science.369.6508.1156 · DOI
- Kobayashi-Solomon, Erik 2019b, ‘Capitalism vs Climate Change: Front Line Interview I’, Forbes, 21 May, available at: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/erikkobayashisolomon/2019/05/21/capitalism-vs-climate-change-front-line-interview-i/>. 10.1111/anti.12532 · DOI
- Krauss, Clifford 2019, ‘Blamed for Climate Change, Oil Companies Invest in Carbon Removal’, New York Times, 7 April, available at: <https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/07/business/energy-environment/climate-change-carbon-engineering.html>. 10.1504/IJGE.2009.031333 · DOI
- Lackner, Klaus S. 2010, ‘Washing Carbon Out of Thin Air’, Scientific American, 302: 66–71. 10.1038/scientificamerican0610-66 · DOI
- Lackner, K.S. and C.H. Wendt 1995, ‘Exponential Growth of Large Self-Reproducing Machine Systems’, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 21: 55–81. 10.1016/0895-7177(95)00071-9 · DOI
- Lackner, Klaus S., Christopher H. Wendt, Darryl P. Butt et al. 1995, ‘Carbon Dioxide Disposal in Carbonate Minerals’, Energy, 20: 1153–1170. 10.1016/0360-5442(95)00071-N · DOI · Paper page
- Lackner, Klaus, Hans Joachim Ziock and Patrick Grimes 1999, ‘Carbon Dioxide Extraction from Air: Is it an Option?’, conference report, Los Alamos National Laboratory, <https://www.osti.gov/biblio/20013487-carbon-dioxide-extraction-from-air-option>. 10.1260/095830509789625374 · DOI
- Lackner, Klaus S., Richard Wilson and Hans-Joachim Ziock 2001, ‘Free-Market Approaches to Controlling Carbon Dioxide Emissions to the Atmosphere: A Discussion of the Scientific Basis’, in Global Warming and Energy Policy, edited by Behram N. Kurşunoğlu, Stephan L. Mintz and Arnold Perlmutter, New York: Springer. 10.1073/pnas.1108765109 · DOI
- Lackner, Klaus S., Sarah Brennan, Jürg M. Matter et al. 2012, ‘The Urgency of the Development of CO2 Capture from Ambient Air’, PNAS, 109: 13156–13162. 10.4324/9780203479605 · DOI
- Larsen, John, Whitney Herndon and Galen Hiltbrand 2020b, Capturing New Jobs: The Employment Opportunities Associated with Scale-Up of Direct Air Capture (DAC) Technology in the US, Rhodium Group, available at: <https://rhg.com/>. 10.1021/ef900064c · DOI
- Leckel, Dieter 2009, ‘Diesel Production from Fischer-Tropsch: The Past, the Present, and New Concepts’, Energy and Fuels, 23: 2342–2358. 10.1016/j.aos.2008.03.002 · DOI
- Lohmann, Larry 2009, ‘Toward a Different Debate in Environmental Accounting: The Cases of Carbon and Cost–Benefit’, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34: 499–534. 10.1007/s10584-004-0080-6 · DOI
- Lövbrand, Eva 2004, ‘Bridging Political Expectations and Scientific Limitations in Climate Risk Management: On the Uncertain Effects of International Carbon Sink Policies’, Climatic Change, 67: 449–460. 10.1163/156920609X399218 · DOI
- Mac Dowell, Niall, Paul S. Fennell, Nilay Shah and Geoffrey C. Maitland 2017, ‘The Role of CO2 Capture and Utilization in Mitigating Climate Change’, Nature Climate Change, 7: 243–249. 10.1038/nclimate1804 · DOI
- Mackey, Brendan, Colin Prentice, Will Steffen et al. 2013, ‘Untangling the Confusion around Land Carbon Science and Climate Change Mitigation Policy’, Nature Climate Change, 3: 552–557. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Malewar, Amit 2020, ‘BMW Invests in Technology that Recycles CO2 from the Air into Carbon-Neutral Gasoline’, Inceptive Mind, 11 June, available at: <https://www.inceptivemind.com/bmw-invests-prometheus-fuels-recycles-co2-air-carbon-neutral-gasoline/13746/>. 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.03.001 · DOI
- Mandel, Ernest 1995, Long Waves of Capitalist Development: A Marxist Interpretation, London: Verso. 10.1038/s41558-017-0064-y · DOI · Paper page
- Markusson, Nils, Duncan McLaren and David Tyfield 2018, ‘Towards a Cultural Political Economy of Mitigation Deterrence by Negative Emissions Technologies (NETS)’, Global Sustainability, 1: 1–9. 10.1073/pnas.1012253108 · DOI · Paper page
- Matter, Juerg M., Martin Stute, Sandra Ó Snæbjörnsdottir et al. 2016, ‘Rapid Carbon Mineralization for Permanent Disposal of Anthropogenic Carbon Dioxide Emissions’, Science, 352: 1312–1314. 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01745.x · DOI
- McAfee, Kathleen 2012, ‘The Contradictory Logic of Global Ecosystem Services Markets’, Development and Change, 43: 105–131. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.01.002 · DOI
- McGinnis, Rob 2020, ‘CO2-to-Fuels Renewable Gasoline and Jet Fuel Can Soon Be Competitive with Fossil Fuels’, Joule, 4: 509–511. 10.1038/s41558-020-0740-1 · DOI
- McLaren, Duncan and Nils Markusson 2020, ‘The Co-Evolution of Technological Promises, Modelling, Policies and Climate Change Targets’, Nature Climate Change, 10: 392–397. 10.1021/acs.est.0c00476 · DOI
- McQueen, Noah, Peter Psarras, Hélène Pilorgé et al. 2020, ‘Cost Analysis of Direct Air Capture and Sequestration Coupled to Low-Carbon Thermal Energy in the United States’, Environmental Science and Technology, 54: 7542–7551. 10.1007/s10584-012-0684-1 · DOI
- Meadowcroft, James 2013, ‘Exploring Negative Territory: Carbon Dioxide Removal and Climate Policy Initiatives’, Climatic Change, 118: 137–149. 10.1007/s00710-018-0589-4 · DOI · Paper page
- Mervine, Evelyn M., Siobhan A. Wilson, Ian M. Power et al. 2018, ‘Potential for Offsetting Diamond Mine Carbon Emissions through Mineral Carbonation of Processed Kimberlite: An Assessment of De Beers Mine Sites in South Africa and Canada’, Mineralogy and Petrology, 112: 755–765. 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Morton, Evvan V. 2020, Reframing the Climate Change Problem: Evaluating the Political, Technological, and Ethical Management of Carbon Dioxide Emissions in the United States, PhD dissertation, Arizona State University, available at: <https://repository.asu.edu/items/57290>.
- Mulvaney, Dustin 2019, Solar Power: Innovation, Sustainability, and Environmental Justice, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 10.1038/s41558-017-0045-1 · DOI
- NRG 2016, ‘The Shoe without a Footprint’, YouTube, 13 September, available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a03PbC8UdqQ>. 10.1260/0958-305X.25.5.971 · DOI
- Obersteiner, Michael, Johannes Bednar, Fabian Wagner et al. 2018, ‘How to Spend a Dwindling Greenhouse Gas Budget’, Nature Climate Change, 8: 7–10. 10.1260/095830509789625374 · DOI
- Oxfam 2015, ‘Extreme Carbon Inequality’, Oxfam Media Briefing, 2 December, available at: <https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/mb-extreme-carbon-inequality-021215-en.pdf>. 10.36019/9781978809390-009 · DOI
- Oxfam 2020, ‘Confronting Carbon Inequality’, Oxfam Media Briefing, 21 September, available at: <https://www.oxfam.org/en/research/confronting-carbon-inequality>. 10.1126/science.aam9726 · DOI
- Parenti, Christian 2020, ‘A Left Defence of Carbon Dioxide Removal: The State Must Be Forced to Deploy Civilization-Saving Technology’, in Sapinski, Buck and Malm (eds.) 2020. 10.1038/nclimate3231 · DOI · Paper page
- Peters-Stanley, Molly and Daphne Yin 2013, Maneuvering the Mosaic: State of the Voluntary Carbon Markets 2013, Forest Trends’ Ecosystem Marketplace and Bloomberg New Energy Finance, available at: <https://www.forest-trends.org/publications/maneuvering-the-mosaic-state-of-the-voluntary-carbon-markets-2013/>. 10.1111/1467-8306.9303007 · DOI
- Price, Grant 2019, By the Feet of Men, Alresford: John Hunt Publishing. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.04.018 · DOI · Paper page
- Prudham, Scott 2003, ‘Taming Trees: Capital, Science, and Nature in Pacific Slope Tree Improvement’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93: 636–656.
- Rathi, Akshat 2019, ‘A Tiny Tweak in California Law Is Creating a Strange Thing: Carbon-Negative Oil’, Quartz, 1 July, available at: <https://qz.com/1638096/the-story-behind-the-worlds-first-large-direct-air-capture-plant/>. 10.1016/j.oneear.2019.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Realmonte, Giulia, Laurent Drouet, Ajay Gambhir et al. 2019, ‘An Inter-Model Assessment of the Role of Direct Air Capture in Deep Mitigation Pathways’, Nature Communications, 10: 1–12. 10.1021/acs.est.0c00476 · DOI
- Realmonte, Giulia, Laurent Drouet, Ajay Gambhir et al. 2020, ‘Reply to “High Energy and Materials Requirement for Direct Air Capture Calls for Further Analysis and R&D”’, Nature Communications, 11: 1–2. 10.7551/mitpress/11478.001.0001 · DOI
- Robinson, Kim Stanley 2020, ‘Slowing Climate Change with Sewage Treatment for the Skies’, Bloomberg, 13 December, available at: <https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-2012-13/kim-stanley-robinson-direct-air-capture-is-a-public-good-for-climate-era>. 10.1038/s41558-017-0045-1 · DOI
- Sapinski, J.P., Holly Jean Buck and Andreas Malm (eds.) 2020, Has It Come to This? The Promises and Perils of Geoengineering on the Brink, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press. 10.36019/9781978809390-009 · DOI
- Saudi Aramco 2020b, ‘Technology Development: Carbon Management’, available at: <https://www.aramco.com/en/creating-value/technology-development/globalresearchcenters/carbon-management>. 10.1073/pnas.1012253108 · DOI · Paper page
- Seifritz, W. 1990, ‘CO2 Disposal by Means of Silicates’, Nature, 345: 486. 10.1111/1467-8306.9303007 · DOI
- Sekera, June and Andreas Lichtenberger 2020, ‘Assessing Carbon Capture: Public Policy, Science, and Societal Need’, Biophysical Economics and Sustainability, 5: 1–28. 10.1126/science.369.6508.1156 · DOI
- Service, Robert F. 2019, ‘This Former Playwright Aims to Turn Solar and Wind Power into Gasoline’, Science, 3 July, available at: <https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/07/former-playwright-aims-turn-solar-and-wind-power-gasoline>. 10.1039/C9EE02709B · DOI
- Service, Robert F. 2020, ‘The Carbon Vault’, Science, 369: 1156–1159. 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198749325.001.0001 · DOI
- Stuart, Diana, Ryan Gunderson and Brian Petersen 2020, ‘Carbon Geoengineering and the Metabolic Rift: Solution or Social Reproduction?’, Critical Sociology, online first. 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.006 · DOI · Paper page
- Supekar, Sarang D., Tae-Hwan Lim and Steven J. Serklos 2019, ‘Costs to Achieve Target Net Emissions Reductions in the US Electric Sector Using Direct Air Capture’, Environmental Research Letters, 14: 1–11. 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.07.013 · DOI · Paper page
- Temple, James 2019a, ‘Startups Looking to Suck CO2 from the Air Are Suddenly Luring Big Bucks’, MIT Technology Review, 2 May, available at: <https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/05/02/135513/startups-looking-to-suck-c02-from-the-air-are-suddenly-luring-big-bucks/>. 10.1038/345486b0 · DOI · Paper page
- Temple, James 2019b, ‘Why the World’s Biggest CO2-Sucking Plant Would be Used to … Err, Dig Up More Oil?’, MIT Technology Review, 27 May, available at: <https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/05/27/135203/why-the-worlds-biggest-cosub2-sub-sucking-plant-would-be-used-to-err-dig-up-more-oil/>. 10.1007/s10584-006-9172-9 · DOI
- Van Vuuren, Detlef, Michel G.J. Den Elzen, Paul L. Lucas et al. 2007, ‘Stabilizing Greenhouse Gas Concentrations at Low Levels: An Assessment of Reduction Strategies and Costs’, Climatic Change, 81: 119–159. 10.1038/s41558-018-0259-x · DOI
- Vettese, Troy 2018, ‘To Freeze the Thames’, New Left Review, II, 111: 63–86. 10.1073/pnas.1801317115 · DOI
- Walker, Tom, Christina Kaiser, Florian Strasser et al. 2018, ‘Microbial Temperature Sensitivity and Biomass Change Explain Soil Carbon Loss with Warming’, Nature Climate Change, 8: 885–889. 10.1126/science.abb7772 · DOI
- Wang, Sirui, Zhuang Qianlai, Lähteenoja Outi et al. 2018, ‘Potential Shift from a Carbon Sink to a Source in Amazonian Peatlands under a Changing Climate’, PNAS, 115: 12407–12412. 10.1038/nclimate3231 · DOI · Paper page
- Wang, Songhan, Zhang Yongguang, Ju Weimin et al. 2020, ‘Recent Global Decline of CO2 Fertilization Effects on Vegetation Photosynthesis’, Science, 370: 1295–1300. 10.1038/nclimate1804 · DOI
- Wilcox, Jennifer 2020, ‘AirMiners Conference Series – Deep Dive on Direct Air Capture with Dr. Jennifer Wilcox’, organised by airminers.org, YouTube, 17 June, available at: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XguPodnZ7g0>. 10.1029/2018EF000954 · DOI
- Wilcox, Jennifer, Peter C. Psarras and Simona Liguori 2017, ‘Assessment of Reasonable Opportunities for Direct Air Capture’, Environmental Research Letters, 12: 1–7. 10.1038/s41558-018-0259-x · DOI
- Wohland, Jan, Dirk Witthaut and Carl-Friedrich Schleussner 2018, ‘Negative Emission Potential of Direct Air Capture Powered by Renewable Excess Electricity in Europe’, Earth’s Future, 6: 1380–1384. 10.1038/nclimate1451 · DOI
- Wright, Oliver 2020, ‘Dominic Cummings Wins £100m to Save Planet by Sucking CO2 from Air’, The Times (London), 3 July, available at: <https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/dominic-cummings-wins-100m-to-save-planet-by-sucking-co2-from-air-8qv3mzjx8>. 10.4324/9780203479605 · DOI
- York, Richard 2012, ‘Do Alternative Energy Sources Displace Fossil Fuels?’, Nature Climate Change, 2: 441–443. 10.1007/s10584-012-0684-1 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Direct air capture: process technology, techno-economic and socio-political challenges
Erans, M., Sanz-Pérez, E. S., Hanak, D. P., Clulow, Z., Reiner, D. M., & Mutch, G. A. (2022) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/d1ee03523a · Cited by 688
Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet
Ajl, M. (2023) · Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1177/22779760221145232 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Malm, A., & Carton, W.
- Affiliations
- Associate Professor, The Human Ecology Division, Lund University Lund Sweden
- Senior Lecturer, Lund University Center for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS) Lund Sweden
- Venue
- Historical Materialism
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2021-03-16
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-48
- ISSN
- 1465-4466
- 1569-206X
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 11
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review