The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 3 of the 55 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation: Healing the Modern Chinese Body with theTreatise on Cold Damage
Open accessAbstract
<section class="abstract">The changing status of the Treatise on Cold Damage over its nearly two millennia of existence is perhaps one of the most interesting and reliable markers of trends in Chinese medicine theory and practice. During the early twentieth century, the Treatise may have reached the pinnacle of its importance when Chinese intellectuals believed that European and Japanese imperialism threatened the survival of the Chinese nation and even the Chinese race. Elite doctors in this period sought to heal the nation, and its frail bodies, by making the Treatise the linchpin of a reformed medical practice. They were inspired by the evidential scholarship trend within Confucianism, the antiquity and empiricism of the Treatise, and the apparent strength and robustness of its formulas. They were also drawn to unique Japanese interpretations of the Treatise, which seemed to be rigorous and scientific enough to compete with biomedicine in Japanese society. To these Chinese elite, the Treatise was the ultimate antidote to the world altering forces of the times and the foundation for building a renewed medical tradition that was distinctly Chinese. But after the Communist Revolution in 1949, the Chinese nation was no longer under threat. It became important to define the uniqueness of the Chinese body rather than dispel its weaknesses and frailties. The significance of the Treatise has ebbed in contemporary Chinese medicine, as it became just one important text among many in defining the modern Chinese body. </section>
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
62 Own interpretation · 35 No basis given · 33 Sources not found · 17 Not checked yet · 9 No full text of the sources · 6 Own result · 1 Supported · 1 Partly supported · 1 Couldn’t confirm · accuracy not yet measured
In the paper
“the latter becoming a mainstay of neuropsychiatry for decades in China, long after this diagnosis had fallen out of favor in the West.3”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [3] Deng, 1955, ‘Wenbing xueshuo de fasheng yu chengchang’温病学说的发生与成长 ( ‘The Origin and Development of Warm Disorders Theory’), Zhongyi zazhi 中医杂志 (Journal of Chinese Medicine)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the Jiangnan region, China’s cultural center in the Republican era, a small but influential group of doctors believed themselves to be besieged by a culture of weakness and an embrace of physical frailty.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Their vision of renewal ultimately failed to win the battle for the future of Chinese medicine.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Working on his textbook, Research on the Treatise on Cold Damage 《傷寒論研究》, in 1924, Yun Tieqiao described how he first encountered Japanese medical scholarship:”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But the greater concern and most damning charge against Warm Illness treatments was that they could have perilous, life-threatening side effects.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This conviction was deeply intertwined with the emergence of the Warm Illness current of medical practice, a school of medical practice that focused on epidemics and febrile conditions thought to be outside the canonical Cold Damage tradition.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Early formulators of Warm Illness therapies, who happened to all be from Jiangnan, originally portrayed their work as supplementing the canonical formulas of The Treatise of Cold Damage.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“One textbook, Clarifying the Principles of Warm Illness 《溫病明理》, was written explicitly to address confusions that he believed were caused by Warm Illness current.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“During the Qing, evidential scholarship elevated Zhang Zhongjing to the great sage of medicine, the progenitor of all that was great in China’s medical traditions.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Ironically, if there were one point on which Republican era Cold Damage advocates could agree with their Warm Illness adversaries, it would have been on the historical failures of the Cold Damage tradition.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 74
- It may state two separate claims as one. 79
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Every source the paper cites for this claim was checked and supports it.
In the paper
“Like Zhang Taiyan, with whom he had a very close relationship, he dismissed Warm Illness scholarship. My humble ambition is to help Chinese medicine flourish, and therefore I cannot avoid to correct false theories…. The books of Wang Mengying, Wu Jutong, Ye Tianshi are filled with flaws and errors.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [25] Karchmer, 2013, ‘The Excitations and Suppressions of the Times: Locating the Emotions in the Liver in Modern Chinese Medicine’, Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry source
In “The Critique of Speculation” (page not provided), Karchmer says Yun Tieqiao openly disliked the Warm Illness current and its leading figures, and describes their writings as a “flowing poison.” This supports the paraphrase that Yun dismissed the scholarship, although the passage does not reproduce the quoted “flaws and errors” wording. (LLM, conf=0.90)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Supported
The cited sources that could be checked couldn’t confirm or dispute this claim.
In the paper
“Yun was particularly impressed with Kitamura Tadahiro 喜多村直寛, who he believed had surpassed all Chinese writers in articulating a solution to one of the thorniest and most important theoretical questions surrounding The Treatise: what are the six jing 六經?”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Could not verifycites [32] Scheid, 2013, ‘Transmitting Chinese Medicine: Changing Perceptions of Body, Pathology, and Treatment in Late Imperial China’, Asian Medicine: Tradition and Modernity sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
The Fang Youzhi: Re-imagining the Body section discusses interpretations of the six jing, and Responses to Ke Qin in China and Japan discusses Japanese physicians’ influence. Neither the supplied passages nor searches for Yun Tieqiao and Kitamura Tadahiro establish Yun’s opinion of Kitamura or the claimed comparison with Chinese writers. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Could not verify
The cited sources support only part of this claim — read each source’s verdict below.
In the paper
“Yun Tieqiao notes that Chinese commentators have generally been in agreement about the nature and the location of the three yang jing - Taiyang corresponds to the exterior, Yangming to the interior, and Shaoyang to the half-exterior, half-interior - but have been almost silent on the three yin jing.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Partly supportedcites [32] Scheid, 2013, ‘Transmitting Chinese Medicine: Changing Perceptions of Body, Pathology, and Treatment in Late Imperial China’, Asian Medicine: Tradition and Modernity sourceExperimental — accuracy not yet measured
In “Fang Youzhi: Re-imagining the Body” (page unavailable), the paper associates greater yang with the exterior and lesser yang with a ‘half exterior half interior’ boundary, supporting part of the sentence’s description. It does not attribute to Yun Tieqiao the claim that Chinese commentators generally agreed about the three yang jing or were almost silent about the three yin jing; it also describes yang brightness as the body shell proper rather than simply the interior. (LLM, conf=0.76)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Partly supported
In the paper
“In the early 20th century, diseases of depletion seemed to be rampant in Chinese society. Old diseases, such as spermatorrhea, became ubiquitous in the mainstream press; new diseases, such as neurasthenia, were embraced by medical professionals”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [3] Deng, 1955, ‘Wenbing xueshuo de fasheng yu chengchang’温病学说的发生与成长 ( ‘The Origin and Development of Warm Disorders Theory’), Zhongyi zazhi 中医杂志 (Journal of Chinese Medicine)
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As the new state pushed doctors to come to a consensus about professional standards, The Treatise was recognized as one of the four canons of Chinese medicine but not its central text.”
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“From 1909 to 1921, he translated and published at least 83 titles, the majority of which were Japanese works on Western medicine.30”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [30] Morris, 2004 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“I encountered an antique dealer selling dozens of old Japanese books, including more than 20 about The Treatise. I bought them all, in order to glimpse the origins of Eastern Medicine 東洋醫學. I found them clear and straightforward, superior than our various commentators, such as Chen [Xiuyuan] and Yu [Chang]….31”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [31] Scheid, 2007
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1925, Yun Tieqiao opened a Chinese medicine correspondence school, using a series of textbooks that he wrote himself.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But he was also dismayed by the scholarship on The Treatise, which he expressed in a preface to Lu Yuanlei’s opus, A Modern Interpretation of the Treatise on Cold Damage.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Writing in 1929 as a major political crisis with Western medicine was coming to a head, Lu Yuanlei reminds his readers of the importance of The Treatise in the struggle with this new competitor.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: In 1929 there was a major political crisis involving Western medicine that was coming to a head.
In the paper
“Yang Shoujing 楊守敬, one of the first Chinese political envoys to Japan, played an important role in this new intellectual exchange, collecting more than 30,000 Japanese texts. His 1884 publication of thirteen Japanese medical texts in a volume called The Medical Collection of the Ancestral Virtues Hall 《聿修堂醫學叢書》 marked the first time Japanese Kampo medical texts became available for a Chinese a”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] 2011, ‘Comparative Research on Ancient Medical Book Evidence from China, Japan, Korea, and Vietnam’ (中日韩越古医书数据的比较研究)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Perhaps more importantly, he believed that only a small number of diseases fell into the Warm Illness rubric. If his contemporaries would stop misdiagnosing so many conditions as Warm Illnesses, they would soon recognize that Zhang Zhongjing’s work already contained the treatments they needed.27”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [27] Lee, 1999, ‘Diagnosis Postponed: Shenjing Shuairuoand the Transformation of Psychiatry in Post-Mao China’, Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Chinese interest in Japanese Kampo writings developed a little later in the 1920s, in part due to the Kampo revival movement that was gaining momentum at just this moment.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In a passage from A Collection of Insights from Discussing Medicine in the Reading Room 《籀簃談醫—得集》, Zhang Shanlei 張山雷 provides a typical example of this sort of claim.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Like Yao Shichen, Lu Yuanlei 陸淵雷 was dismayed by the great popularity of the Warm Illness approach. For him, the future of Chinese medicine lay in the return to The Treatise.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The two camps were equally fearful of the other’s treatment, but they perceived the dangers differently.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But whereas Warm Illness scholars tended to see gaps and limitations in the Cold Damage perspective that called for a fresh approach, adherents to the Cold Damage current saw a decaying scholarly tradition that was plagued by errors of transmission and philosophical distortion.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zhu Weiju 祝味菊, one of the most respected clinicians from this period, gave a detailed accounting of this process.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“But Fei Boxiong’s mild-acting prescriptions were not just for the rich. They were generally inexpensive, appealing to both wealthy patients whose chronic conditions needed long-term treatment and local peasants who could only afford a short course of treatment.8”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Lu, 2008 (1931)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Xu Dachun 徐大椿 (1693 – 1771), a rough contemporary of Ye Tianshi, exemplified the influence of this movement in medical discourse. In Treatise on the Origin and Development of Medicine 《醫學源流論》, he rejected the Ming dynasty celebration of the four masters in emphatic terms.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1911, Wada Keijuro launched the revival movement with a vigorous defense of Kampo medicine in his treatise, The Hammer of the Medical World.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, following the Sino-Japanese War of 1895, Japan was better know as a source of biomedical knowledge, attracting numerous students to Japan’s biomedical schools in the early 1900s.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The following passage by Yao Shichen 姚世琛 captures the frustration of a Cold Damage advocate, feeling surrounded by timid Jiangnan colleagues. In the preface to Records of Experiments with Canonical Formulas 《經方實驗錄》, the influential Republican era book by Cao Yingfu 曹穎甫 on clinical applications of The Treatise, he directs his vitriol at the key Warm Illness innovators and their pampered patients.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Yun Tieqiao also argued that treatments for Warm Illnesses are already present in Zhang Zhongjing’s work. He directed his students to passages from Zhang Zhongjing’s other text, The Synopsis of Formulas from the Golden Casket 《金匱要略》, where the second chapter contained therapies for dampness 濕 and heatstroke 暍, conditions that he considered to be true Warm Illnesses.26”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] Kleinman, 1986
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Wu Youke’s critique of the Cold Damage tradition was only slowly taken up, his therapeutic innovations generally considered too piecemeal to constitute an alternative tradition.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For the Warm Illness proponents, Cold Damage herbs and formulas were too powerful for frail, southern bodies. According to the popular expression, most Jiangnan physicians viewed “Ephedra and Cinnamon twigs like they were snakes and scorpions.”11”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [11] Xu, 2008 (1757), Yixue yuanliu lun医学源流论 ( Treatise on the Origin and Development of Medicine)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Zhang Taiyan considered The Treatise to be China’s greatest medical text and the basis for a flourishing medical tradition that could withstand the challenge of Western medicine. “The only reason that Chinese medicine is superior to Western medicine is The Treatise on Cold Damage.”21”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [21] Fang, 2012, Barefoot Doctors and Western Medicine in China source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The answer that major figures of the Warm Illness movement have given was straightforward: the inadequacies of the Cold Damage therapies necessitated these innovations.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Leading doctors in the Jiangnan area challenged the deeply held beliefs in the delicacy of southern constitutions and argued for a more robust form of medical practice.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Zhang Taiyan tackled this problem in an essay, entitled “Yangming Illness Is Warm Illness” 《論陽明病即溫熱病》, arguing that the section of The Treatise on the Yangming jing already contained an analysis of and therapeutic approach for Warm Illnesses.24”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [24] Howland, 1996, Borders of Chinese Civilization: Geography and History at Empire’s End, Asia-Pacific: Culture, Politics, and Society source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The next major innovator in the Warm Illness current, the famous Qing dynasty physician, Ye Tianshi (1667-1746), was actually a careful reader of Ke Qin, one of the great Qing scholars of The Treatise on Cold Damage.16 An eclectic practitioner and virtuoso clinician, Ye Tianshi also read Wu Youke’s treatise and adopted some of his ideas.17”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [16] Zhang, 2009
- Not checked yetcites [17] Zhu, 2005, Shanghan zhinan伤寒质难 ( Interrogating Difficulties Concerning the Treatise on Cold Damage)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zhu’s “eight principles” has become a standard feature of textbook Chinese medicine and is now called “eight principles pattern differentiation 八綱辨證.””
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In 1950, Zhu Weiju published his major opus, Interrogating Difficulties Concerning the Treatise on Cold Damage 《傷寒質難》. It was the last and perhaps most radical book by an elite Republican era medical reformer.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He came to Shanghai in 1917, and, as described above, was initially perplexed by the medical conventions he encountered.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Yun Tieqiao notes that Ke Qin, the great evidential scholar and Chinese physician, came closest to making similar claims. But he scornfully dismisses the whole history of Chinese commentary on The Treatise for its muddle-headedness.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [34] Shapiro, 1998, ‘The Puzzle of Spermatorrhea in Republican China’, Positions source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As a young man in Sichuan, he was exposed to a variety of medical influences, first learning Chinese medicine with his father, later studying Western medicine at a military medicine academy for two years, and ultimately travelling to Japan for one year to learn about their medical system.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“It is a mistake to use “The Discourse on Heat” to interpret The Treatise on Cold Damage. It is a mistake on a mistake to use “the meridians” to interpret The Treatise…. To use qi transformation to interpret The Treatise is make another mistake on top of the previous mistakes…. And to use exterior and interior, depletion and repletion to explain The Treatise, like Kitamura Tadahiro 喜多村直寛, who says”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“By the next day, Boyuan had stabilized; a week later his fever was gone; one month later he had made a full recovery.39”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Taiyang is the initial response; shaoyang is an unhelpful response; yangming is an excessive response; taiyin and shaoyin are both an insufficient response; jueyin is the last response.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Xu was reluctant. Believing his son was dying of a Warm Illness and knowing Zhu Weiju’s proclivity for Cold Damage formulas, he feared that Zhu’s treatment would be the final blow. But with his son’s life seemingly beyond hope, he finally agreed.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The resources for these efforts, already considerably less then what was being budgeted for Western medicine, were divided between developing medical schools and hospitals for Chinese medicine while also pursuing Mao’s vision of an “integrated medicine 中西醫結合,” a program in which doctors of Western medicine would receive training in Chinese medicine to help create a “new medicine.””
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“But Zhu considered this allegiance to the number six arbitrary, arguing that there are only five basic pathological responses to contagious disease.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Zhu and Xu’s competing medical philosophies were put to the test when Xu’s son, Xu Boyuan 徐伯遠, became gravely ill (perhaps with typhoid fever) at the age of nineteen. Despite meticulous medical attention from the father, Boyuan grew sicker each day, until he was in critical condition.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
hedgedSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“By 1940, when Lu Yuanlei was producing a new textbook for his course on The Treatise, he argued that the six jing were simply six major constellations of symptoms, rejecting the explanation of Kitamura Tadahiro that his teacher Yun Tieqiao had found so apt just 15 years earlier.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [38]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For example, Zhu Weiju argued that The Treatise was a guide to the treatment of “externally contracted 外感” diseases, in particular typhoid.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“True to his nickname, Aconite Zhu’s first prescription contained a large dose of the very hot and toxic herb, Aconiti Radix lateralis praeparata 附子. Zhu Weiju stayed by Xu Boyuan’s side throughout a difficult night.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plainSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He had argued that the six jing of The Treatise had no underlying reality, rather they merely represented six fundamental constellations of symptoms that one observes in externally contracted illnesses.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In the aftermath of this case, Xu Xiaopu was so awed with Zhu Weiju’s clinical abilities and disappointed with his own failures that he effectively “converted” to the Cold Damage school. Both of his sons became disciples of Zhu Weiju, and he went on to become one of the most respected pediatricians in Shanghai, skillfully marshaling the very Cold Damage formulas he had once feared, helping”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [39]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A Warm Illness advocate, Xu Xiaopu believed that the “pure yang 純陽” of the child must not be disturbed by the use of warming herbs.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“He then goes one to provide an explanation for how the “stages” are related to the relative strength of the patient’s “orthodox qi 正氣” and the pathogen’s “heterodox qi 邪氣.””
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
- Not matched
In the paper
“The Treatise never uses the words six jing. Rather it discusses the three yin and three yang to mark exterior and interior, cold and hot, deficiency and repletion. Therefore it has nothing to do with the organs or the meridians…”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [33] Scheid, 2015, ‘The History of Chinese Medicine, 1890–2010’ source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For all externally contracted diseases, orthodox qi must mount a response, as long as there is excitation caused by some organic pathogen 有機之邪. The tendency of that response will never fall outside five stages. The symptoms of the so-called six jing also never exceed the boundaries of the five stages.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [42]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Some reformist doctors, such as Lu Yuanlei, a student of Yun Tieqiao, were inspired by Yumoto and the Kampo revival movement. He celebrated Yumoto’s work, both to challenge biomedical doctors who looked to Japan as a model for the abolishment of traditional medicine and to remind the Chinese medicine profession that its most valuable legacy was based on The Treatise.35”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
What the sources say
- Not checked — no full text of the sourcecites [35] Shapiro, 2003, ‘How Different Are Western and Chinese Medicine? The Case of Nerves’ source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“According to Lu Bingkui 呂炳奎, there were roughly ten times as many doctors of Chinese medicine to doctors of Western medicine in 1949. By the end of the Cultural Revolution in 1976, the two professions were at numerical parity.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [47]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zhu critiques Lu Yuanlei for not going far enough in his discourse on the six jing, for lacking “innovation ” and failing to free himself from the “constraints of the six jing 六經藩籬.””
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This radicalization was strongly shaped by Yumoto Kyushin’s 湯本求真 influential book, Sino-Japanese Medicine 《皇漢醫學》, published in 1927 (translated into Chinese in 1928). This text was a major event in the revival of Kampo medicine in Japan and became the most widely read Japanese medical text in China.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) came to power espousing “the unity of Western medicine and Chinese medicine 中西醫團結,” its policies in the early 1950s focused primarily on the rapid expansion of the biomedical profession.44”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [44]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zhu Weiju took this effort to find equivalences between The Treatise and biomedical disease conditions a step further, naming the first four chapters of his book, Interrogating Difficulties Concerning the Treatise on Cold Damage, after the biomedicine stages of infection: incubation stage, prodromal stage, illness stage, and convalescence stage.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The Cold Damage 傷寒 referred to in The Treatise on Cold Damage 《傷寒論》 has a completely different connotation than the Western medicine term “typhoid fever 傷寒.” We must be clear about this point.50”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“Likewise, the editors have emphasized a more conservative definition of the six jing, rejecting biomedical explanations and emphasizing the links to The Inner Canon.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“He acknowledges the important connections between the six jing and the 12 major meridians, the viscera (or organ) system, and to a lesser extent the eight principles, rejecting the most speculative claims – that the six jing are the Six Climatic Qi – and the most empirical – Lu Yuanlei’s assertion that they correspond to six fundamental syndromes.52”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [52]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“For example the fifth edition, the most highly regarded of all the editions, adamantly rejects any attempt to equate typhoid fever with Cold Damage.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [50]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First published in 1960 and then updated in 1964, 1972, 1978, 1984, and 1996, the national textbooks have been one of the great achievements of the Chinese medicine profession in the Communist period, creating a standardized curriculum for the state-run colleges of Chinese medicine.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The six jing are the framework for pattern recognition and treatment determination with regards to The Treatise on Cold Damage. It is based on the six jing differentiation of patterns found in “The Discourse on Heat” in The Inner Canon, but it represents an advance over them.51”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [51]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
In the paper
“As Yun Tieqiao remarked, “with regards to the reform of medicine, there is no other path than the mixing [of Chinese medicine] with Western medicine.”49”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [49]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
In the paper
“In Interpretation and Explication of the Treatise on Cold Damage, Chen rejects the Republican era narrowing of The Treatise to externally contracted disease (particularly typhoid fever) and emphasizes Qing claims about its applicability to “the hundred diseases 百病” or all diseases.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [52]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Following the Communist Revolution, fears about national weakness and physical deficiency gave way to a desire to define national uniqueness and the special characteristics of Chinese medicine.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Contemporary scholars usually place the doctors discussed in this paper, figures such as Yun Tieqiao, Lu Yuanlei, and Zhu Weiju, as followers of the Convergence School 中西醫匯通派, a current of medical practice in the late 19th and early 20th century that blended elements of Chinese medicine and Western medicine.”
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [2] Cui, 1993
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this article, I argue that fears about physical degeneration among Chinese elites in the early 20th century not only dominated political discourse, but also animated debate among medical practitioners.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These concerns were central to the program for medical reform they promoted, which eschewed centuries of late imperial medical scholarship and called for a renewal of the medical profession based on the Han dynasty medical classic, Zhang Zhongjing’s The Treatise on Cold Damage.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only through a renewal of the past, they believed, could one strengthen medical practice, overcome weakness, and reinvigorate the nation.”
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In this passage, “the crowd of drunks” is indisputably the Warm Illness practitioners, easily identified by the long list of therapies, usually applied more or less in the order in which Zhu Weiju recounts them.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In his Treatise on Febrile Epidemics 《瘟疫論》, he argues that febrile epidemics 瘟疫, a concept that later merges with “warm illness 溫病,” are actually far more prevalent than Cold Damage.15”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [15] Zhang, 2008, Zhang Shanlei yishu erzhong张山雷医书二种 ( Two Medical Books by Zhang Shanlei)
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Not matched
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Kampo medicine in Japan had been in decline since 1874, when the Meiji government passed licensing legislation that vigorously promoted biomedicine and curtailed the practice of Kampo medicine.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Republican era reformers were considerably more radical than Qing evidential scholars, such as Xu Dachun, in their critique of speculative philosophy.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zhu’s critique, echoed widely amongst his reformist colleagues, was that the Warm Illness therapies, the “appropriate actions” listed above, did not treat the illness at these various stages, but rather accelerated or actually caused the disease to progress through these stages, until death became the inevitable outcome.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Rests on an assumption: The Warm Illness current, like the Cold Damage school, had a theory that diseases progressed through stages of increasing severity.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Indeed, the Warm Illness current was a scholarly enterprise that emerged in response to perceived limitations of the Cold Damage approach, and we will explore the rationale behind its development below.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The famous Daoist innovator, Chen Yingning 陳攖甯, advocated a form of Daoist practice, The Immortals Learning 仙學, that he developed in response to his own struggles with consumption. Stressing activism, practice, autonomy, innovation, Chen promoted The Immortals Learning techniques of self-cultivation to create a robust body strong enough to repel foreign influences.4”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [4] Deng, 2000, Zhongguo yixue tongshi中国医学通史 ( Comprehensive History of Medicine in China)
plaindirectSingle case- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In elite medical practice, concern over weak bodies in the Republican period had a transformative effect on medical discourse.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But it also demonstrates the level of alarm that Lu felt regarding the dangers of Warm Illness therapies.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As Chinese doctors began to encounter this literature, they could not help but admire its rigor, as well as its usefulness in furthering a reformist agenda.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Marta Hanson has argued a strong sense of regional uniqueness had emerged in Jiangnan during the Qing dynasty, particularly as the Qing state was weakened by the disruption of the Taiping Rebellion (1853-1864) and the strain of European imperialist encroachments in the late 19th century.5”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Li, 1985, Shanghanlun jiangyi 伤寒论讲义 (Lecture Notes for the Treatise on Cold Damage)
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But the polemics here do point to deeper political concerns, which we can only grasp by first trying to understand the perceived danger of gentle therapies.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In his brief but seminal essay, The Treatise on Warmth and Heat 《溫熱論》, published posthumously in 1777 by his students, it is unlikely that Ye Tianshi imagined himself founding a new current of medical practice.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although tension between Cold Damage and Warm Illness proponents had been simmering for a long time, the former celebrating Zhang Zhongjing as the one true sage of medicine, the latter proclaiming Ye Tianshi as a second sage, Yao’s diatribe seems to have a new urgency to it: as if to say, in these troubled times, weak bodies and weak medicine can only perpetuate national weakness.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Medicine for frail bodies
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In medical scholarship, evidential scholarship compelled a reconsideration of centuries of medical discourse.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“For the reform-minded Cold Damage advocates, the dangers of cooling herbs were more pernicious: they worked to hasten the natural progression of a disease, masking their dangers behind more familiar clinical presentations, but inevitably leading to death.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The apotheosis of Zhang Zhongjing began to reach dizzying heights in the Republican period as reformers sought a new path forward out of China’s colonial situation.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The problem of orthodoxy
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lu Yuanlei’s analysis, itself built on a critique of Yun Tieqiao and his adoption of Kitamura Tadahiro’s explication of the six jing, had been an attempt to expunge all speculative philosophy from this debate.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Building on Lu Yuanlei’s analysis of the six jing from A Modern Interpretation of the Treatise on Cold Damage, Zhu Weiju’s five stages takes the reformist debates on the six jing to their logical conclusion.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Qing evidential scholars, like Ke Qin, had critiqued this kind of narrow interpretation of The Treatise, arguing that its formulas were useful in the treatment of all diseases.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With Zhu Weiju’s five stages, this last vestige of traditional theory, the enduring depiction of the inner topography of the body that originates with The Inner Canon, was swept away.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zhu’s “five stages,” however, captures his radical reinterpretation of The Treatise.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zhu Weiju (1884-1951) was a legendary clinician, the anecdotes about his clinical achievements suggesting that he may have been even more skilled than his very talented colleagues.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“If frail bodies were not healed immediately, Communist policies at least promised an egalitarian, homogenous body for all, strengthened through the labor regimens of workers, peasants, and soldiers.43”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [43]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the name is new, the eight principles – yin-yang, exterior-interior, cold-hot, and depletion-repletion – are not much different than the diagnostic techniques that were emphasized in late imperial medicine.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“But these reform efforts also faded away because frail bodies no longer endangered the nation. China no longer needed a strong medicine to save the nation but a uniquely Chinese form of medicine to highlight the nation’s special characteristics.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the success of the Communist Revolution in 1949, a century of imperialism and decades of war and political chaos came to an end. The survival of the nation was no longer in doubt.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Zhu’s most important innovation in this text are his two guides to clinical practice: “the five stages and eight principles 五段八綱.””
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In spite of their debt to evidential scholarship, Republican reformers generally took a narrower interpretation of the applicability of The Treatise, perhaps because their interest in biomedicine trumped their concerns for evidential scholarship.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In part, these reform efforts were superseded by the work of the state to create modern health care institutions. The Communist government, unlike its Nationalist predecessors, now had the political control and resources to invest in the institution building necessary to a modern state.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Republican era medical reformers attempted to systematically expunge Chinese medicine of all speculative philosophy. In the process, they abandoned the foundational entities of the body – the organs, the meridians, qi transformation – reducing them to the six jing.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Republican era reformers, however, did not perceive a profound epistemological divide between Chinese medicine and Western medicine. They believed that the two medical practices described the same, underlying body.41”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
What the sources say
- Not matchedcites [41]
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Not matched
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“His boldness, his skill in using the warming herbs and formulas from The Treatise, his notoriety for defying the Jiangnan predilection for gentle, cooling therapies, earned him much acclaim.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The encounter with Japanese Kampo scholarship expanded rapidly over the next few years, becoming inspiration for more radical thought in China.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Lu Yuanlei’s use of biomedicine in his scholarship was perhaps unmatched, except by his friend and colleague Zhu Weiju 祝味菊.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Removing speculation, borrowing from Japan
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While Republican physicians clearly recognized the significant differences between the two uses of this term, reformist scholars such as Zhu Weiju, Yun Tieqiao, and others were also inclined to emphasize their similarities, particular since the disease course of typhoid has certain parallels with the theory of disease transmission found in The Treatise.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Today’s doctors advocate the integration of two medical systems, because they hope to bring together the best of two distinct and fundamentally different medical systems.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These seemingly small points capture one of the fundamental differences of the two eras.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“He carefully examines the major explanations about the nature six jing, adjudicating the pros and cons of each position, staking out a neutral and seemingly reasonable position.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Chen Yiren, chief editor of the authoritative study of The Treatise by the Nanjing College of Chinese Medicine, provides additional examples of this pursuit of uniqueness.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the Republican era, reformist doctors were in pursuit of a single truth and single body. Concepts and theories from biomedicine could be illuminating for this purpose, even if they seemed to strain the meaning of the original text.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although doctors no longer revere The Treatise as some of their Republican predecessors once did, they nonetheless consider it invaluable for thinking about the nature of Chinese medicine and its future role in Chinese society.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As Lecture Notes for The Treatise on Cold Damage 《傷寒論講義》, the textbook for The Treatise illustrates, the editors have been cautious about making overt comparisons between Chinese medicine and Western medicine. But at times, they have clearly been in dialogue with Republican era reformers from the Cold Damage camp.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In a world where biomedicine has become hegemonic, if there is only one medical body and a single truth about how that body works, Chinese medicine is redundant. But if Chinese medicine is based on another body, distinct from the anatomical structures of Western medicine, but encapsulating an alternative truth about how the body works, than a space is opened up for its role in modern Chinese”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Integration today is focused on using the two medical systems together in clinical practice. It is predicated on the assumption of epistemological differences – not equivalences – between the two systems of medicine.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Throughout this discussion, Chen carefully defends the uniqueness of The Treatise and its conception of the body based on the six jing. Not only is it distinct from the anatomical body of Western medicine, but it doesn’t correspond exactly to other conceptions of the body found in Chinese medicine theory.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Today’s doctors consider that project contrived and naive, because the body of Chinese medicine is unique and epistemologically distinct from the anatomical body of biomedicine.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The Treatise with Chinese characteristics
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
In 1929 there was a major political crisis involving Western medicine that was coming to a head.
“Writing in 1929 as a major political crisis with Western medicine was coming to a head, Lu Yuanlei reminds his readers of the importance of The Treatise in the struggle with this new competitor.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The Warm Illness current, like the Cold Damage school, had a theory that diseases progressed through stages of increasing severity.
“The Warm Illness current, like the Cold Damage school, had a theory of how diseases, particularly externally contracted diseases, progressed through stages of increasing severity.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > The perils of mildness
“In 16th year of the Republic [1927], I came to Shanghai to escape political turmoil.”
§ Ancient Formulas to Strengthen the Nation > Discovering the truth of The Treatise
“He came to Shanghai in 1917, and, as described above, was initially perplexed by the medical conventions he encountered.”
Citations
Cites
Training the body for China: sports in the moral order of the People's Republic
(1996) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.33-3383 · Cited by 427
Elman, B. A. (1984) · Harvard University Asia Center eBooks · doi:10.1163/9781684172443 · Cited by 222
Marrow of the Nation: A History of Sport and Physical Culture in Republican China
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.42-4095 · Cited by 192
Elman, B. A. (1984) · Harvard University Asia Center eBooks · doi:10.2307/j.ctt1tg5kdt · Cited by 181
Diagnosis Postponed: Shenjing Shuairuo and the Transformation of Psychiatry in Post-Mao China
Lee, S. (1999) · Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry · doi:10.1023/a:1005586301895 · Cited by 147
(2007) · Cited by 127
Social Origins of Distress and Disease: Depression, Neurasthenia, and Pain in Modern China
Dünner, D. L. (1987) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.144.12.1617-a · Cited by 119
Barefoot Doctors and Western Medicine in China
Fang, X. (2012) · doi:10.1017/9781580467889 · Cited by 93
Speaking of Epidemics in Chinese Medicine
Hanson, M. E. (2012) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203829592 · Cited by 61
‘The Puzzle of Spermatorrhea in Republican China’
Shapiro, H. (1998) · positions: asia critique · doi:10.1215/10679847-6-3-551 · Cited by 53
Research works printed but not linked: 18
- Cao, 2004 (1936), Jingfang shiyan lu經方實驗錄 ( Records of Experiments with Canonical Formulas)
- Cui, 1993, Xin zhongguo zhongyi shiye dianji ren: Lu Bingkui cong yi liushi nian wenji 新中国中医事业奠基人:吕炳奎从医六十年文集 (Founder of the Chinese Medicine Profession in New China: The Collected Writings of Lu Bingkui’s Sixty Years in Medicine)
- Deng, 1955, ‘Wenbing xueshuo de fasheng yu chengchang’温病学说的发生与成长 ( ‘The Origin and Development of Warm Disorders Theory’), Zhongyi zazhi 中医杂志 (Journal of Chinese Medicine), 5, 6
- Li, 1985, Shanghanlun jiangyi 伤寒论讲义 (Lecture Notes for the Treatise on Cold Damage)
- Lu, 2010, Xu Xiaopu yian lunji 徐小圃医案医论集 (A Collection of the Medical Cases and Medical Essays of Xu Xiaopu)
- Lu, 2008, Lu Yuanlei yishu erzhong陆渊雷医书二种 ( Two Medical Books of Lu Yuanlei)
- Lu, 2008 (1931), Shanghanlun jin shi 伤寒论今释 (A Modern Interpretation of the Treatise on Cold Damage)
- Mao, 1917, ‘Tiyu zhi yanjiu’體育之研究 ( ‘A Study on Physical Education’) Xin qingnian新青年 ( New Youth) April 1, juan, 3, 2
- 1992 (1959), Shanghanlun shishi 伤寒论译释 (The Interpretation and Explication of the Treatise on Cold Damage)
- Xu, 2008 (1757), Yixue yuanliu lun医学源流论 ( Treatise on the Origin and Development of Medicine)
- Yun, 2007 (1924), Shanghanlun yanjiu 傷寒論研究 (Research on the Treatise of Cold Damage)
- Yun, 2008, Yun Tieqiao zhongyi han shou jiangyi xuanbian 恽铁樵中医函授讲义选编 (Selections of the Chinese Medicine Correspondence Textbooks of Yun Tieqiao)
- Wada, 1910, Ikai no tettsui 医界之鉄椎 (The Hammer of the Medical World) Nankōdō 南江堂
- Zhang, 2008, Zhang Shanlei yishu erzhong张山雷医书二种 ( Two Medical Books by Zhang Shanlei)
- Zhang, 2009, Zhang Taiyan xiansheng lun shanghan 章太炎先生论伤寒 (Mr. Zhang Taiyan’s Discourse on Cold Damage)
- Zhu, 2005, Shanghan zhinan伤寒质难 ( Interrogating Difficulties Concerning the Treatise on Cold Damage)
- Andrews, 1996, The Making of Modern Chinese Medicine, 1895–1937
- Taylor, 2004, Chinese Medicine in Early Communist China, 1945–1963: A Medicine of Revolution
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Not your average joint: Towards precision medicine in psoriatic arthritis
Castillo, R., & Scher, J. U. (2020) · Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.clim.2020.108470 · Cited by 11
Daidoji, K., & Karchmer, E. I. (2017) · East Asian Science Technology and Society An International Journal · doi:10.1215/18752160-3701876 · Cited by 5
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Karchmer, E. I.
- Affiliations
- Appalachian State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Karchmer, Eric I.
- Venue
- Asian Medicine
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2013-08-18
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 394-422
- ISSN
- 1573-420X (ISSN-L)
- 1573-4218
- PMC
- PMC4765078
- OpenAlex
- W964447020
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2020: 1 · 2017: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Asian Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (088246)
- University of Westminster
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › History of Medicine Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › History of Science and Medicine
- Keywords
- Shanghan Lun, traditional Chinese medicine, history of Chinese medicine, national health, Confucianism, biomedicine, modern Chinese medicine
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-04, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-04 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review