Cited by 12Ancient Egypt and ArchaeologyClassical Antiquity StudiesAncient Near East History

The Theban Kingdom of Dynasty 16: Its Rise, Administration and Politics

Ilin-Tomich, Alexander·2014·Journal of Egyptian History

Abstract

This paper focuses on the emergence of the Theban kingdom of Dynasty 16 in the Second Intermediate Period and explores the historical repercussions of its assumed struggle with the declining state of Dynasty 13 centered at Itjtawy. A revision of the recent evidence from Edfu raises doubts about the alleged contemporaneity of Sobekhotep iv and Khayan. A survey of administrative titles in the sources pertaining to the Theban kingdom testifies that it arose independently based on the local power structures of the Late Middle Kingdom rather than because of a relocation from the north. The separation of the nascent Theban kingdom from the state of Dynasty 13 and a surmised consequent confrontation between these entities had an impact on the ideology of the new polity and influenced the policy of its direct successor—the state of Dynasty 17 and the early New Kingdom. The original lack of legitimacy of Dynasty 16 could have been one of the reasons for overstating the power of the Hyksos in historical texts—in order to justify Theban claims to rule in Middle and Lower Egypt.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/18741665-12340016

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The first evidence of a royal name with Thoth is Sekhemra Sementawy Djehuty, whose dynastic attribution is still debated.

    “However, the first evidence is Sḫm-R ꜥ -Smn-tꜢwy Ḏḥwty, king Sekhemra Sementawy Djehuty, whose dynastic attribution is still debated.”

    From The Kingship and the Moon from the Late 17th to Early 18th Dynasties (2024) · cites this paper as Ilin-Tomich 2014, 143-193

  • It can be argued that only the rulers who erected monuments at Karnak are mentioned in the Karnak king-list.

    “It can be argued that only the rulers who erected monuments at Karnak are mentioned (Ilin-Tomich 2014).”

    From Second Intermediate Period (2009) · cites this paper as Ilin-Tomich 2014

  • Private memorials attest the continuity of administrative structures employed by the local southern Upper Egyptian administration of the Late Middle Kingdom.

    “They attest the continuity of administrative structures employed by the local southern Upper Egyptian administration of the Late Middle Kingdom (Ilin-Tomich 2014).”

    From Second Intermediate Period (2009) · cites this paper as Ilin-Tomich 2014

  • Moeller, Marouard, and Ayers argued that the copresence of sealings with the names of Khian and Sobekhotep IV in the abandonment layer of an administrative building at Edfu indicated the two kings were contemporaries.

    “Moeller, Marouard, and Ayers (Moeller et al. 2011) argued that the copresence of sealings with the names of Khian and Sobekhotep IV in the abandonment layer of an administrative building at Edfu indicated the two kings were contemporaries (for counterarguments, see Ilin-Tomich 2014).”

    From Second Intermediate Period (2009) · cites this paper as Ilin-Tomich 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ilin-Tomich, A.
Affiliations
Institute of Oriental Studies (RU)
Corresponding author
Ilin-Tomich, Alexander
Venue
Journal of Egyptian History
Published
2014-11-20
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
143-193
ISSN
  • 1874-1657 (ISSN-L)
  • 1874-1665
OpenAlex
W2060193914
Cited by
12
References
2
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Egyptian History (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
Second Intermediate Period, Edfu, Late Middle Kingdom, political legitimacy, Hyksos, Middle Egypt, Lower Egypt, Thebes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review