Cited by 98Comparative Animal Anatomy StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetryForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

Size and Position of the Functional Components of the Skull. a Contribution To the Knowledge of the Architecture of the Skull, Based On Data in the Literature

Van Der Klaauw, C.J.·1952·Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/187530152x00017

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Morphological integration is not absolute but organized in units that are relatively independent while participating to generate a structure that acts as a functional whole.

    “Nonetheless, this integration is not absolute but organized in units that are relatively independent while participating to generate a structure that act as functional whole.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Der Klaauw, C. J.
Venue
Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie
Published
1952
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1-556
ISSN
  • 0365-5164 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-3019
OpenAlex
W2021119973
Cited by
96
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Archives Néerlandaises de Zoologie (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Comparative Animal Anatomy Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
cranial size, skull morphology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review