Institutional linkages in international society: polar perspectives
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Oceans governance extends beyond national boundaries and includes multiple policy domains.
“Oceans governance extends beyond national boundaries and includes multiple policy domains (Shivakoti et al., 2021;Stokke, 2013;Young, 1996).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Young, 1996
Institutions in one environmental space affect another; overlapping international treaties can be characterized as embedded, nested, or clustered.
“Frequently, institutions in one environmental space affect another; Young (1996) characterized overlapping international treaties as embedded, nested, or clustered.”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Young (1996)
Obligations in one treaty affect another.
“Like many international treaties, obligations in one treaty affect another (Young 1996).”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Young 1996
Local and regional actors and organizations leveraged arguments and strategies honed within larger Indigenous movements, such as those led by the ICC, and fought to ensure that the centrality of whaling to identity and sovereignty was not lost in numeric discussions of quotas, food security and whale numbers.
“Looking back over this history of cross-level institutional navigation, local and regional actors and organizations leveraged arguments and strategies honed within larger Indigenous movements, such as those led by the ICC (Gerhardt, 2017;Sidorova, 2019;Young, 1996), and fought to ensure that the centrality of whaling to identity and sovereignty was not lost in numeric discussions of quotas, food”
From Institutional navigation of oceans governance: Lessons from Russia and the United States Indigenous multi-level whaling governance in the Arctic (2022) · cites this paper as Young, 1996
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zelli, F., & van Asselt, H. (2013) · Global Environmental Politics · doi:10.1162/glep_a_00180 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
York, A. M., Zdor, E., BurnSilver, S., Degai, T., Monakhova, M., Isakova, S., Petrov, A. N., & Kempf, M. (2022) · Earth System Governance · doi:10.1016/j.esg.2022.100154 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- Young, G. R.
- Corresponding author
- Young, Gran R.
- Venue
- Global Governance
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 1996-07-19
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 1075-2846 (ISSN-L)
- 1942-6720
- OpenAlex
- W2936062325
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 9.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Relations and Foreign Policy
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Arctic and Russian Policy Studies
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Science and Diplomacy
- Keywords
- institutional linkages, international society, international organizations, multilateralism, international relations theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
