Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 449

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance

Open access
Scholte, Jan Aart·2002·Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed substantial civil society mobilisation on questions of global governance.This paper considers the implications of this development for democracy.After specifying concepts of 'civil society', 'democracy', 'globality' and 'governance', the paper identifies deep democratic deficits that have emerged as a consequence of contemporary globalisation.The discussion then outlines various ways that civil society can either enhance or undermine democracy in the governance of global relations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/19426720-00803004

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Metadata

Authors
Scholte, J. A.
Venue
Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations
Published
2002-07-28
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
281-304
ISSN
  • 1075-2846 (ISSN-L)
  • 1942-6720
OpenAlex
W1863699034
Cited by
449
References
0
FWCI
60.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1163/19426720-00803004
The paper
Scholte, J. A. (2002). Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations. https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00803004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.