Cited by 17Aesthetic Perception and AnalysisEthics, Aesthetics, and ArtArt, Aesthetics, and Perception

Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful: Is there a Male Gaze in Empirical Aesthetics?

Open access
Ortlieb, Stefan A., Fischer, Uwe C., Carbon, Claus-Christian·2016·Art and Perception

Abstract

In his ground-breaking Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful, Edmund Burke (1757) presented a comprehensive aesthetic theory based on two types of aesthetic appreciation: the beautiful and the sublime. While beauty inspires us with tender feelings of affection, a thrill of delightful horror attracts us to the sublime. According to Burke these ideas originate in a drive for affiliation (beautiful) and a drive for self-preservation (sublime). He also claims that the sublime is generally the more powerful aesthetic experience. A synopsis of literature on gender differences in aesthetic preferences, personality traits, and social motivation suggests, however, that on average women might be less susceptible to the Burkeian sublime than men. We tested this hypothesis empirically using sixty picture details from a triptych by Hieronymus Bosch. One hundred and fifty participants rated these stimuli in terms of threat (respectively safety) and liking. Besides, they completed standardized scales for state and trait anxiety as well as for state and trait depression. We found a strong effect for gender: on average, safety and liking were more closely related for female than for male participants. In the light of these findings we state that Burke’s concepts of the beautiful and the sublime might in fact be confounded with gender-related aesthetic preferences and that his proclivity to the sublime could reflect a male gaze on aesthetics. Finally, we discuss possible indicators for ‘Burke’s fallacy’ in empirical aesthetics today.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/22134913-00002051

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. ‘Longinus’. (1965). ‘Longinus’ on Sublimity (D. A. Russell, transl.), Clarendon, Oxford, UK.
  2. WigginsJ. S. and BroughtonR. (1985). The interpersonal circle: A structural model for the integration of personality research, in: Perspectives in personality, Vol. 1, HoganR. and JonesW. H. (Eds), pp. 1–47, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, USA.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Ortlieb, S. A., Fischer, U. C., & Carbon, C.-C.
Affiliations
University of Bamberg (DE)
Venue
Art and Perception
Published
2016-09-16
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
205-224
ISSN
  • 2213-4905 (ISSN-L)
  • 2213-4913
OpenAlex
W2337280276
Cited by
17
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Art & Perception (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Art, Aesthetics, and Perception
Keywords
Edmund Burke, sublime, the beautiful, male gaze, aesthetic experience, anxiety, depression, Hieronymus Bosch, self-preservation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review