Bos indicus and Bos namadicus and the problem of autochthonous domestication in India
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The majority of fossils of oxen species found in India from the late Quaternary (Pleistocene) period have been attributed mainly to Bos namadicus, the species considered to be the wild stock of the extant domestic Bos indicus.
“The majority of fossils of oxen species found in India from the late Quaternary (Pleistocene) period have been attributed mainly to Bos namadicus, the species considered to be the wild stock of the extant domestic Bos indicus (Grigson 1985;Chauhan 2008).”
From Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae) (2018) · cites this paper as Grigson 1985
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Duality in Bos indicus mtDNA diversity: Support for geographical complexity in zebu domestication
Magee, D. A., Mannen, H., & Bradley, D. G. (2007) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/1-4020-5562-5_17 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Bos frontalis and Bos gaurus (Artiodactyla: Bovidae)
Ahrestani, F. S. (2018) · Mammalian Species · doi:10.1093/mspecies/sey004 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
South Asian contributions to animal domestication and pastoralism
Patel, A. K., & Meadow, R. H. (2017) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199686476.013.19 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Ancient Mongolian aurochs genomes reveal sustained introgression and management in East AsiaPreprint
Brunson, K., Witt, K. E., MONGE, S., Williams, S. R., Peede, D., Odsuren, D., Bukhchuluun, D., Cameron, A., Szpak, P., Amartuvshin, C., et al. (2023) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2023.08.10.552443 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Aurochs Bos primigenius Bojanus, 1827
van Vuure, T. (2014) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139568098.017 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Murphy, C., & Fuller, D. Q. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-3934-5_10005-1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Grigson, C. (2007) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.2006.00279.x · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationMurphy, C., & Fuller, D. Q. (2016) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7747-7_10005
- Authors
- Grigson, C.
- Corresponding author
- Grigson, Caroline
- Venue
- Recent Advances in Indo-Pacific Prehistory
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 1985-01-01
- Pages
- 425-428
- OpenAlex
- W4384807273
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Livestock Farming and Management
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
- Keywords
- Bos indicus, cattle breeds
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
