PREDYNASTIC—EARLY DYNASTIC CHRONOLOGY
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Naqada relative chronology is incongruous with new archaeological evidence in several respects, including absence of whole classes of ceramics, local stylistic and compositional variations, and differences in object clustering.
“Problems have included the absence of whole classes of ceramics, local stylistic and compositional variations, and differences in object clustering (Friedman 1994; Hendrickx 2006; Wengrow 2006).”
From Radiocarbon dating and the Naqada relative chronology (2014) · cites this paper as Hendrickx 2006
During Naqada IIIA-B, a group in the Abydos region was able to engineer a confluence of power over the broad array of potential resources.
“during Naqada IIIA-B-the ''proto-dynastic'' period or, for Naqada IIIB, the so-called ''Dynasty 0'' (Hendrickx 2006, pp.88-89)-a group in the Abydos region was able to engineer a confluence of power over the broad array of potential resources.”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Hendrickx 2006
Decorated pottery disappeared.
“and decorated pottery disappeared (Hendrickx 2006).”
From The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation (2016) · cites this paper as Hendrickx 2006
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Egyptian Predynastic and State Formation
Stevenson, A. (2016) · Journal of Archaeological Research · doi:10.1007/s10814-016-9094-7 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“It is in ceramic production and technology, however, that the most obvious changes are found (Hendrickx 2006, p. 78; Köhler 2014; Wengrow 2006, pp. 92–98).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialRadiocarbon dating and the Naqada relative chronology
Dee, M. W., Wengrow, D., Shortland, A. J., Stevenson, A., Brock, F., & Bronk Ramsey, C. (2014) · Journal of Archaeological Science · doi:10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.016 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hendrickx, S.
- Corresponding author
- Hendrickx, Stan
- ORCID
- Hendrickx, Stan
- Venue
- Ancient Egyptian Chronology
- Publisher
- BRILL
- Published
- 2006-01-01
- Pages
- 53-93
- OpenAlex
- W2199880511
- Cited by
- 52
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.71
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient Egypt and Archaeology
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Ancient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Classical Antiquity Studies
- Keywords
- Predynastic Egypt, Early Dynastic period, Egyptian chronology, chronology of ancient Egypt
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
