Cited by 1Historical Astronomy and Related StudiesBiblical Studies and InterpretationAncient Near East History

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

FOUNDATIONS OF DAY-EXACT CHRONOLOGY: 690 BC–332 BC

Depuydt, Leo·2006·Ancient Egyptian Chronology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/9789047404002_031

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Still being checked.

Metadata

Authors
Depuydt, L.
Corresponding author
Depuydt, Leo
Venue
Ancient Egyptian Chronology
Publisher
BRILL
Published
2006-01-01
Pages
458-470
OpenAlex
W2198205871
Cited by
1
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Biblical Studies and Interpretation
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Ancient Near East History
Keywords
ancient chronology, historical dating, time-calibrated phylogeny, ancient Near East, Seleucid period, Hellenistic period

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review