Cited by 6Indian and Buddhist StudiesChinese history and philosophyTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

23. Esoteric Buddhism In The Tang: From Atikūta To Amoghavajra (651–780)

Orzech, Charles D.·2011·Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in East Asia

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1163/ej.9789004184916.i-1200.95

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Metadata

Authors
Orzech, C. D.
Corresponding author
Orzech, Charles D.
Venue
Esoteric Buddhism and the Tantras in East Asia
Publisher
BRILL
Published
2011-01-01
Pages
261-285
OpenAlex
W1535328080
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BRILL eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Religious studies › Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Chinese history and philosophy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Keywords
esoteric Buddhism, Tang dynasty, Amoghavajra, Chinese Buddhism, Buddhist transmission, 7th century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review