The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Capsaicin cough sensitivity decreases with successful treatment of chronic cough.
Abstract
To assess the role of enhanced cough sensitivity in the pathogenesis of cough, we measured cough severity on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and capsaicin cough sensitivity (the concentration required to elicit two [C2] and five [C5] coughs) in 87 consecutive patients referred with chronic cough. Measurements were repeated after complete investigation and treatment, when patients were entered into one of four study groups: (1) treatment success (primary cause of cough successfully treated with elimination of the cough, n = 48); (2) primary treatment failure (treatment of potential primary cause of cough unsuccessful, n = 12); (3) cough treatment failure subgroup A (potential primary cause of cough identified and successfully treated but no improvement in cough, n = 8); and (4) cough treatment failure subgroup B (no potential primary cause of cough identified, n = 19). All patients in groups 3 and 4 were nonsmokers, had normal chest radiography and negative histamine challenge test, and failed to respond to intensive empirical treatment for rhinitis and gastroesophageal reflux. The VAS cough severity was lower and log C2 and C5 higher after treatment compared with initial values in the treatment success group but not in the other three groups. Enhanced sensitivity of airway nerves that mediate cough is important in the pathogenesis of nonproductive cough, and successful treatment is associated with a reduction in cough sensitivity. While enhanced sensitivity of airway nerves is usually present in patients with identifiable causes of chronic nonproductive cough, it is also found in other patients in whom the cause of cough is unknown.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prevalence, pathogenesis, and causes of chronic cough
Chung, K. F., & Pavord, I. D. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60595-4 · Cited by 665
Managing Cough as a Defense Mechanism and as a Symptom
Irwin, R. S., Boulet, L.-P., Cloutier, M. M., Fuller, R., Gold, P. M., Hoffstein, V., Ing, A. J., McCool, F. D., O’Byrne, P., Poe, R. H., et al. (1998) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.114.2_supplement.133s · Cited by 648
Self-citationRecommendations for the management of cough in adults
Morice, A. H. (2006) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thx.2006.065144 · Cited by 572
Eosinophilic Bronchitis Is an Important Cause of Chronic Cough
BRIGHTLING, C. E., WARD, R., GOH, K. L., WARDLAW, A. J., & PAVORD, I. D. (1999) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.160.2.9810100 · Cited by 431
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor-Induced Cough
Dicpinigaitis, P. V. (2006) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.129.1_suppl.169s · Cited by 393
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Connell, F., Thomas, V. E., Pride, N. B., & Fuller, R. W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-08
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 374-380
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2027027734
- Cited by
- 239
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Capsaicin cough sensitivity decreases with successful treatment of chronic cough. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.150.2.8049818
- The paper
- O'Connell, F., Thomas, V. E., Pride, N. B., & Fuller, R. W. (1994). Capsaicin cough sensitivity decreases with successful treatment of chronic cough. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.150.2.8049818
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.