The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The influence of age, diagnosis, and gender on proper use of metered-dose inhalers.
Abstract
Metered dose inhalers (MDIs) are widely used in clinical practice for administering pharmaceuticals targeted to the lung. It is well known that the inhalation technique used with MDIs can substantially influence the clinical response to inhaled medications. To determine the acceptability of MDI maneuvers, we studied 59 subjects (26 females and 33 males; age, 20 to 81 yr; mean age, 38 yr) to determine whether the MDI technique used by these individuals complied with published recommendations for acceptable inhalation technique. Measurements were made with an MDI adapter that contained an unobtrusive, lightweight, miniature sensing system. Inspiratory flow at the moment of MDI actuation (Va), the volume (integrated from airflow) at actuation as a fraction of total inspiratory volume (Va/VI), breath-holding time (tBH), and inspiratory volume as a fraction of FVC (VI/FVC) were determined from 59 uncoached inhalations. We defined an acceptable maneuver, based on published data, by four components: (1) inspiratory flow at actuation (Va) between 25 and 90 L/min; (2) actuation during early inspiration (0 < Va/VI < or = 0.20); (3) adequate breath-holding time (tBH > 4 s), and (4) a deep inhalation (VI/FVC > 0.50). For all subjects, only 25% of inhalation maneuvers met all four criteria for acceptability. We found that a significantly higher proportion of male than female subjects performed an acceptable MDI maneuver (43% versus 4%, p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in technique between younger and older subjects or between patients with a diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We conclude that most patients use their MDIs incorrectly; females of all ages are much more likely to have improper MDI technique than are males.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Differences in the use of procedures between women and men hospitalized for coronary heart disease
Ayanian, J. Z., & Epstein, A. M. (1991) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199107253250401 · Cited by 1,188
Cited by
Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Troosters, T., Casaburi, R., Gosselink, R., & Decramer, M. (2005) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200408-1109so · Cited by 649
Misuse of corticosteroid metered-dose inhaler is associated with decreased asthma stability
Giraud, V., & Roche, N. (2002) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.02.00218402 · Cited by 538
Systematic Review of Errors in Inhaler Use
Sanchis, J., Gich, I., & Pedersen, S. (2016) · CHEST · doi:10.1016/j.chest.2016.03.041 · Cited by 538
Sex Differences Among Adults Presenting to the Emergency Department With Acute Asthma
Singh, A. K. (1999) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.159.11.1237 · Cited by 116
The role of particle physico-chemical properties in pulmonary drug delivery for tuberculosis therapy
Mortensen, N. P., Durham, P., & Hickey, A. J. (2014) · Journal of Microencapsulation · doi:10.3109/02652048.2014.932029 · Cited by 52
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, D. E., Israel, E., Rosenberg, M., Johnston, R., Weiss, S. T., & Drazen, J. M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1994-11
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1256-1261
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2076532858
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The influence of age, diagnosis, and gender on proper use of metered-dose inhalers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952549
- The paper
- Goodman, D. E., Israel, E., Rosenberg, M., Johnston, R., Weiss, S. T., & Drazen, J. M. (1994). The influence of age, diagnosis, and gender on proper use of metered-dose inhalers. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.150.5.7952549
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.