The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Perinatal outcomes in the pregnancies of asthmatic women: a prospective controlled analysis.
Abstract
Prior studies have found an increased incidence of adverse perinatal outcomes of pregnancies in asthmatic mothers, but these studies have been poorly controlled for asthma therapy and other confounding factors. The purpose of this study was to assess perinatal outcomes in actively managed pregnant asthmatic women as compared with matched nonasthmatic controls. Using an inception cohort design, we studied a volunteer sample of 486 pregnant (< 28 wk) women with documented asthma and 486 pregnant nonasthmatic controls with normal pulmonary function. Cases and controls were matched for age, smoking status, parity, and year of delivery. Asthma was managed with step therapy to prevent acute asthmatic episodes and asthma symptoms that interfered with sleep or normal activity. Chronic hypertension was significantly more common (p = 0.007) in asthmatic subjects (3.7%) than in matched controls (1.0%). However, no significant differences in incidences of preeclampsia, perinatal mortality, preterm births, low-birth-weight infants, intrauterine growth retardation, or congenital malformations were observed in the pregnancies of the asthmatic women as compared with the matched controls. Trends were observed toward relationships between more severe asthma requiring emergency therapy or corticosteroids and increased incidences of preeclampsia and low-birth-weight infants, but these associations were not statistically significant. These data suggest that the overall perinatal prognosis for women with actively managed asthma during pregnancy is comparable to that for the nonasthmatic population.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global strategy for asthma management and prevention: GINA executive summary
Bateman, E. D., Hurd, S. S., Barnes, P. J., Bousquet, J., Drazen, J. M., FitzGerald, M., Gibson, P., Ohta, K., O'Byrne, P., Pedersen, S. E., et al. (2008) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00138707 · Cited by 3,203
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
Infant and Maternal Outcomes in the Pregnancies of Asthmatic Women
DEMISSIE, K., BRECKENRIDGE, M. B., & RHOADS, G. G. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.158.4.9802053 · Cited by 293
Integrated perinatal health framework
Misra, D. P., Guyer, B., & Allston, A. (2003) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00090-4 · Cited by 235
Metadata
- Authors
- Schatz, M., Zeiger, R. S., Hoffman, C. P., Harden, K., Forsythe, A., Chilingar, L., Saunders, B., Porreco, R., Sperling, W., & Kagnoff, M.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-04
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1170-1174
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2026560001
- Cited by
- 225
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Perinatal outcomes in the pregnancies of asthmatic women: a prospective controlled analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.151.4.7697248
- The paper
- Schatz, M., Zeiger, R. S., Hoffman, C. P., Harden, K., Forsythe, A., Chilingar, L., Saunders, B., Porreco, R., Sperling, W., & Kagnoff, M. (1995). Perinatal outcomes in the pregnancies of asthmatic women: a prospective controlled analysis. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.151.4.7697248
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.