Cited by 235Maternal and Neonatal HealthcareMaternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumGlobal Maternal and Child Health

Integrated perinatal health framework

Misra, Dawn P, Guyer, Bernard, Allston, Adam·2003·American Journal of Preventive Medicine

Abstract

Background Despite great strides in improving prenatal care utilization among American women, key perinatal indicators have remained stagnant or worsened in the past decade, and the United States continues to rank near the bottom compared to other developed countries. A new approach is needed if we are to achieve improvements in perinatal health.Methods To propose a new framework that integrates a "life span" approach with a multiple determinants model.Results We recognize that (1) powerful influences on outcome occur long before pregnancy begins; (2) pregnancy outcome is shaped by social, psychological, behavioral, environmental, and biological forces; and (3) the demography of pregnancy has changed dramatically in the last few decades with more women delaying their first birth. Approaches that simultaneously consider the entire life span as well as multiple determinants may need to be adopted. We propose a framework that integrates these approaches and is supported by the research literature. The life span perspective focuses attention toward the preconceptional and interconceptional periods as targets for intervention in improving perinatal health. The multiple determinants model distinguishes among concepts of disease, health and functioning, and well-being for both women and their offspring.Conclusions Our intent is to influence how policymakers, public health professionals, clinicians, and researchers approach perinatal health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00090-4

Cites

196 of 196 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High stress and related mental illnesses influence maternal and fetal outcomes and also affect offspring health into adulthood.

    “High levels of stress and associated mental illnesses affect maternal and fetal outcomes, and also long-term offspring health into adulthood.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 199 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Misra, D. P., Guyer, B., & Allston, A.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Misra, Dawn P
Venue
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-07
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
65-75
ISSN
0749-3797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105986652
Cited by
235
References
199
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 13
FWCI
9.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Preventive Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (U93 MC 00101)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
Keywords
perinatal health, preconception care, pregnancy outcomes, social determinants of health, maternal health, child health, health policy framework
MeSH terms
Family Planning Services, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Life Expectancy, Maternal Health Services, Maternal Welfare, Policy Making, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Outcome, United States, Preconception Care, Models, Organizational

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review