The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Alveolar inflammation and its relation to emphysema in smokers.
Abstract
The prevalent theory in the pathogenesis of emphysema proposes that increased numbers of activated neutrophils and/or alveolar macrophages produce large amounts of proteases, an activity that cannot be regulated by alpha 1-antiproteases, resulting in lung destruction. However, the cells in the lung parenchyma of smokers have not been properly identified. We characterized and quantitated the inflammatory cell load in the lungs of smokers and correlated these findings with the degree of lung destruction. Twenty-one patients, six nonsmokers and 15 smokers, undergoing lung resection were studied. Lungs or lobes were fixed and stained for light microscopy and neutrophil identification and immunohistochemically stained for identification of lymphocytes and macrophages. By point counting, we determined the extent of emphysema by the volume density of the lung parenchyma (Vvalv), and the different cell numbers per cubic millimeter in all lungs. In nonsmokers Vvalv was greater than in smokers. The number of neutrophils/mm3 of lung correlated directly with the Vvalv, (r = 0.71, p < 0.01), whereas the number of alveolar macrophages (r = -0.70) and T-lymphocytes (r = -0.78) correlated negatively with the Vvalv. The number of T-lymphocytes correlated negatively with the number of neutrophils (r = -0.58) and positively with the numbers of alveolar macrophages (r = 0.77). Our data suggest that as long as the inflammatory reaction is predominantly of neutrophils there is no destruction of the lung. However, the extent of lung destruction becomes evident, and its extent is directly related to the number of alveolar macrophages and T-lymphocytes/mm3. We conclude that the T-lymphocyte might be importantly implicated in the pathogenesis of emphysema in smokers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Barnes, P. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200007273430407 · Cited by 1,078
Genetic ablation of Nrf2 enhances susceptibility to cigarette smoke–induced emphysema in mice
Rangasamy, T., Cho, C. Y., Thimmulappa, R. K., Zhen, L., Srisuma, S. S., Kensler, T. W., Yamamoto, M., Petrache, I., Tuder, R. M., & Biswal, S. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci200421146 · Cited by 991
Mediators of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Barnes, P. J. (2004) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.56.4.2 · Cited by 710
Transcription Factor NRF2 as a Therapeutic Target for Chronic Diseases: A Systems Medicine Approach
Cuadrado, A., Manda, G., Hassan, A., Alcaraz, M. J., Barbas, C., Daiber, A., Ghezzi, P., León, R., López, M. G., Oliva, B., et al. (2018) · Pharmacological Reviews · doi:10.1124/pr.117.014753 · Cited by 632
Metadata
- Authors
- Finkelstein, R., Fraser, R. S., Ghezzo, H., & Cosio, M. G.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1995-11
- Volume
- 152
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1666-1672
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2081920314
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Alveolar inflammation and its relation to emphysema in smokers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.152.5.7582312
- The paper
- Finkelstein, R., Fraser, R. S., Ghezzo, H., & Cosio, M. G. (1995). Alveolar inflammation and its relation to emphysema in smokers. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.152.5.7582312
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.