Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 991

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genetic ablation of Nrf2 enhances susceptibility to cigarette smoke–induced emphysema in mice

Open access
Rangasamy, Tirumalai, Cho, Chung Y., Thimmulappa, Rajesh K., Zhen, Lijie, Srisuma, Sorachai S., Kensler, Thomas W., Yamamoto, Masayuki, Petrache, Irina, Tuder, Rubin M., Biswal, Shyam·2004·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Although inflammation and protease/antiprotease imbalance have been postulated to be critical in cigarette smoke-induced (CS-induced) emphysema, oxidative stress has been suspected to play an important role in chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Susceptibility of the lung to oxidative injury, such as that originating from inhalation of CS, depends largely on its upregulation of antioxidant systems. Nuclear factor, erythroid-derived 2, like 2 (Nrf2) is a redox-sensitive basic leucine zipper protein transcription factor that is involved in the regulation of many detoxification and antioxidant genes. Disruption of the Nrf2 gene in mice led to earlier-onset and more extensive CS-induced emphysema than was found in wild-type littermates. Emphysema in Nrf2-deficient mice exposed to CS for 6 months was associated with more pronounced bronchoalveolar inflammation; with enhanced alveolar expression of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, a marker of oxidative stress; and with an increased number of apoptotic alveolar septal cells--predominantly endothelial and type II epithelial cells--as compared with wild-type mice. Microarray analysis identified the expression of nearly 50 Nrf2-dependent antioxidant and cytoprotective genes in the lung that may work in concert to counteract CS-induced oxidative stress and inflammation. The responsiveness of the Nrf2 pathway may act as a major determinant of susceptibility to tobacco smoke-induced emphysema by upregulating antioxidant defenses and decreasing lung inflammation and alveolar cell apoptosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci200421146

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Joos, 2002, Swiss Med. Wkly., 132, 27
  2. Nguyen, 2002, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 17, 17
  3. Trevani, 1996, Lab. Invest., 74, 711
  4. Kim, 1996, Cancer Res., 56, 1526
  5. Vogt, 1995, Lab. Invest., 72, 474
  6. Saltini, 1984, Am. Rev. Respir. Dis., 130, 650
  7. Thimmulappa, 2002, Cancer Res., 62, 5196

Cited by

See all 991

Metadata

Authors
Rangasamy, T., Cho, C. Y., Thimmulappa, R. K., Zhen, L., Srisuma, S. S., Kensler, T. W., Yamamoto, M., Petrache, I., Tuder, R. M., & Biswal, S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2004-11-01
Volume
114
Issue
9
Pages
1248-1259
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171319214
Cited by
991
References
48
FWCI
28.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genetic ablation of Nrf2 enhances susceptibility to cigarette smoke–induced emphysema in mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci200421146
The paper
Rangasamy, T., Cho, C. Y., Thimmulappa, R. K., Zhen, L., Srisuma, S. S., Kensler, T. W., Yamamoto, M., Petrache, I., Tuder, R. M., & Biswal, S. (2004). Genetic ablation of Nrf2 enhances susceptibility to cigarette smoke–induced emphysema in mice. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci200421146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.