CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 402Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiologyAsthma and respiratory diseases

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhaled Bronchodilators Reduce Dynamic Hyperinflation During Exercise in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Belman, M J, Botnick, W C, Shin, J W·1996·American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
DOI 10.1164/ajrccm.153.3.8630581
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Dynamic hyperinflation (DH) is a major pathophysiologic consequence of airflow limitation during exercise in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and an important contributing factor to breathlessness. In this study we aimed to examine the effect of inhaled beta agonist therapy on DH during exercise in these patients and the relationship between changes in DH and breathlessness. In 13 COPD patients (mean age 65.1 +/- 2.0, FEV1 1.20 +/- 0.17, FEV1/FVC 40 +/- 3) we measured pulmonary function tests, exercise breathlessness by Borg score, and exercise flow volume and pressure volume loops on two separate days. Prior to testing, patients randomly received inhaled placebo or albuterol on the first test day and the alternative medication on the second test day. From measurements of exercise inspiratory capacity (IC), we calculated the end-expiratory and end-inspiratory lung volumes (EELV, EILV). We used esophageal pressure recordings to measure peak inspiratory esophageal pressure (Pesins) during exercise and this was related to the maximal capacity for pressure generation taking into account lung volume and airflow changes (Pcapi). Bronchodilator caused significant increase in both FEV1 and FVC (+0.23 and +0.51, p<0.01). Comparisons of breathlessness, exercise volumes, and pressures were made at the highest equivalent work load. There was a significant reduction in the peak exercise EELV/TLC (80 +/- 0.02% to 76 +/- 0.02%, p<0.05) while the peak EILV/TLC decreased by 2% (97 +/- 1% to 95 +/- 1%, p<0.05). The peak Pesins/Pcapi decreased (0.79 +/- 0.10 to 0.57 +/- 0.05, p<0.05), and the Pcapi - Pesins increased (7.4 +/- 3 to 13.0 +/- 3 cm H2O, p<0.05). There was significant improvement in neuroventilatory coupling for volume change (Pesins/Pcapi/VT/TLC 5.45 +/- 0.5 to 3.25 +/- 1.0, p<0.05). There was a significant reduction in breathlessness as measured by Borg score (4.5 +/- 0.7 to 3.1 +/- 0.5, p<0.05) and there was a significant correlation between delta Borg and delta EILV/TLC (r=0.771, p<0.01) with a trend for Pesins/Pcapi/VT/TLC (r=0.544, p=0.067). There was also a significant correlation between delta EELV/TLC and delta Pesins/Pcapi/VT/TLC (r=0.772, p<0.01). The relationships between delta Borg, delta resting volumes, and flow rates were not significant. We conclude that in patients with COPD, inhaled bronchodilator reduces exercise DH and improves inspiratory pressure reserve and neuroventilatory coupling. Changes in DH and neuroventilatory coupling were the main determinants of reduced breathlessness.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.153.3.8630581

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 21 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 401

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Belman, M. J., Botnick, W. C., & Shin, J. W.
Affiliations
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US)
ORCID
Shin, J W
Venue
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
1996-03-01
Volume
153
Issue
3
Pages
967-975
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
DOI
10.1164/ajrccm.153.3.8630581
OpenAlex
W2007810665
Cited by
402
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
academic.oup.com/pages/standard-publication-reuse-rights (vor)
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
dynamic hyperinflation, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, inhaled beta-agonists, salbutamol, esophageal pressure, end-expiratory lung volume, inspiratory capacity, pressure-volume loops, inspiratory muscle strength, inspiratory muscle endurance, inspiratory muscle training
MeSH terms
Administration, Inhalation, Adrenergic beta-Agonists, Aged, Albuterol, Bronchodilator Agents, Dyspnea, Esophagus, Physical Exertion, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Inspiratory Capacity, Lung, Lung Diseases, Obstructive, Male, Middle Aged, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, Pressure, Pulmonary Ventilation, Total Lung Capacity, Vital Capacity, Respiratory Mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review