Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 353

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Ultrasound evaluation of the paralyzed diaphragm.

Gottesman, E, McCool, F D·1997·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Ultrasound has been used to evaluate diaphragm thickness in the zone of apposition of the diaphragm to the rib cage. The purpose of this study was to determine if ultrasonography could distinguish between a paralyzed and normally functioning diaphragm. We predicted that a paralyzed diaphragm would be atrophic and not shorten, therefore it would be thin and not thicken during inspiration. Thirty subjects (five with bilateral diaphragm paralysis, seven with unilateral diaphragm paralysis, three with inspiratory weakness but normally functioning diaphragms, and 15 healthy control subjects) had diaphragm ultrasound performed with a 7.5 to 10.0 MHz transducer placed over the lower rib cage in the mid-axillary line. The thickness of the diaphragm (tdi) was measured to the nearest 0.1 mm at FRC (t(di)FRC) and TLC (t(di)TLC). Diaphragm thickening during inspiration (delta t(di)) was calculated as (t(di)TLC - t(di)FRC)/t(di)FRC. In patients with unilateral paralysis, t(di) and delta t(di) for the paralyzed hemidiaphragm were significantly less than those values for the normally functioning hemidiaphragm (1.7 +/- 0.2 mm versus 2.7 +/- 0.5 mm [mean + SD] p < 0.01 for t(di), and -8.5 +/- 13% versus 65 +/- 26% [p < 0.001] for delta t(di)). The t(di) and delta t(di) for patients with bilateral diaphragm paralysis were significantly less than those values for the healthy volunteers (1.8 +/- 0.2 versus 2.8 +/- 0.4 and -1 +/- 15% versus 37 +/- 9% for t(di) and delta t(di), respectively) (p < 0.001). We conclude that ultrasound measurements of t(di) and delta t(di) can be used to determine if a diaphragm is paralyzed and confirm our predictions that a chronically paralyzed diaphragm is atrophic and does not thicken during inspiration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154859

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 353

Metadata

Authors
Gottesman, E., & McCool, F. D.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1997-05
Volume
155
Issue
5
Pages
1570-1574
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2147763236
Cited by
353
References
0
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound evaluation of the paralyzed diaphragm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154859
The paper
Gottesman, E., & McCool, F. D. (1997). Ultrasound evaluation of the paralyzed diaphragm. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.155.5.9154859

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.