Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 276

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quantification of Pulmonary Emphysema from Lung Computed Tomography Images

UPPALURI, RENUKA, MITSA, THEOPHANO, SONKA, MILAN, HOFFMAN, ERIC A., McLENNAN, GEOFFREY·1997·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

A texture-based adaptive multiple feature method (AMFM) for evaluating pulmonary parenchyma from computed tomography (CT) images is described. This method incorporates multiple statistical and fractal texture features. The AMFM was compared to two previously published methods, namely, mean lung density (MLD) and the lowest fifth percentile of the histogram (HIST). First, the ability of these methods to detect subtle differences in ventral-dorsal lung density gradient in the prone normal lung was studied. Second, their abilities to differentiate between normal and emphysematous whole lung slices were compared. Finally, regional analyses comparing normal and emphysematous regions were performed by dividing the lungs. In the CT slices into six equal regions, ventral to dorsal, and analyzing each region separately. The results demonstrated that the AMFM could separate the ventral from the dorsal one-third of the normal prone lung with 89.8% accuracy, compared to an accuracy of 74.6% with the MLD and 64.4% with the HIST methods. The normal and emphysematous slices were separated on a global basis with 100.0% accuracy using the AMFM as compared to an accuracy of 94.7% and 97.4% using the MLD and HIST methods, respectively. The regional normal and emphysematous tissues were discriminated with an average accuracy of 97.9%, 89.9%, and 99.1% with the AMFM, MLD, and HIST methods, respectively. The three methods and the pulmonary function tests in the normal and emphysema groups were poorly correlated. Quantitative texture analysis using adaptive multiple features holds promise for the objective noninvasive evaluation of the pulmonary parenchyma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.9606093

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 16 references

Cited by

See all 276

Metadata

Authors
UPPALURI, R., MITSA, T., SONKA, M., HOFFMAN, E. A., & McLENNAN, G.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1997-07-01
Volume
156
Issue
1
Pages
248-254
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1970378963
Cited by
276
References
16
FWCI
5.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Pulmonary Emphysema from Lung Computed Tomography Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.9606093
The paper
UPPALURI, R., MITSA, T., SONKA, M., HOFFMAN, E. A., & McLENNAN, G. (1997). Quantification of Pulmonary Emphysema from Lung Computed Tomography Images. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.9606093

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.