The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantification of Pulmonary Emphysema from Lung Computed Tomography Images
Abstract
A texture-based adaptive multiple feature method (AMFM) for evaluating pulmonary parenchyma from computed tomography (CT) images is described. This method incorporates multiple statistical and fractal texture features. The AMFM was compared to two previously published methods, namely, mean lung density (MLD) and the lowest fifth percentile of the histogram (HIST). First, the ability of these methods to detect subtle differences in ventral-dorsal lung density gradient in the prone normal lung was studied. Second, their abilities to differentiate between normal and emphysematous whole lung slices were compared. Finally, regional analyses comparing normal and emphysematous regions were performed by dividing the lungs. In the CT slices into six equal regions, ventral to dorsal, and analyzing each region separately. The results demonstrated that the AMFM could separate the ventral from the dorsal one-third of the normal prone lung with 89.8% accuracy, compared to an accuracy of 74.6% with the MLD and 64.4% with the HIST methods. The normal and emphysematous slices were separated on a global basis with 100.0% accuracy using the AMFM as compared to an accuracy of 94.7% and 97.4% using the MLD and HIST methods, respectively. The regional normal and emphysematous tissues were discriminated with an average accuracy of 97.9%, 89.9%, and 99.1% with the AMFM, MLD, and HIST methods, respectively. The three methods and the pulmonary function tests in the normal and emphysema groups were poorly correlated. Quantitative texture analysis using adaptive multiple features holds promise for the objective noninvasive evaluation of the pulmonary parenchyma.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical and structural approaches to texture
Haralick, R. M. (1979) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/proc.1979.11328 · Cited by 5,759
Introduction to Statistical Analysis.
Latshaw, V. V., Dixon, W. J., & Massey, F. J. (1957) · The American Mathematical Monthly · doi:10.2307/2309989 · Cited by 5,072
Fractal-Based Description of Natural Scenes
Pentland, A. P. (1984) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.1984.4767591 · Cited by 1,800
Respiratory function tests; normal values at median altitudes and the prediction of normal results.
Goldman, H. I., & Becklake, M. R. (1959) · PubMed · doi:10.1164/artpd.1959.79.4.457 · Cited by 954
Müller, N. L., Staples, C. A., Miller, R. R., & Abboud, R. T. (1988) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.94.4.782 · Cited by 798
Texture features for classification of ultrasonic liver images
Wu, C.-M., Chen, Y.-C., & Hsieh, K.-S. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.141636 · Cited by 476
Fractal feature analysis and classification in medical imaging
Chen, C.-C., DaPonte, J. S., & Fox, M. D. (1989) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.24861 · Cited by 390
Kinsella, M., Müller, N. L., Abboud, R. T., Morrison, N. J., & DyBuncio, A. (1990) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.97.2.315 · Cited by 298
The Diagnosis of Mild Emphysema: Correlation of Computed Tomography and Pathology Scores
Kuwano, K., Matsuba, K., Ikeda, T., Murakami, J., Araki, A., Nishitani, H., Ishida, T., Yasumoto, K., & Shigematsu, N. (1990) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/141.1.169 · Cited by 280
DIAGNOSIS OF PULMONARY EMPHYSEMA BY COMPUTERISED TOMOGRAPHY
Hayhurst, M. D., Flenley, D. C., Mclean, A., Wightman, A. J. A., Macnee, W., Wright, D., Lamb, D., & Best, J. (1984) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(84)92689-8 · Cited by 279
Cited by
Automatic lung segmentation for accurate quantitation of volumetric X-ray CT images
Hu, S., Hoffman, E. A., & Reinhardt, J. M. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.929615 · Cited by 940
Self-citationGrumelli, S., Corry, D. B., Song, L.-Z., Song, L., Green, L., Huh, J., Hacken, J., Espada, R., Bag, R., Lewis, D. E., et al. (2004) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0010008 · Cited by 484
“CT-Based Evaluation for Emphysema High-resolution CT (two in emphysema group and two in control group) or conventional CT analysis was used to detect emphysema, characterized by the presence of areas of low attenuation contrasted with surrounding normal lung parenchyma [32,33].”
MethodBest, A. C., Meng, J., Lynch, A. M., Bozic, C. M., Miller, D., Grunwald, G. K., & Lynch, D. A. (2008) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2463062200 · Cited by 323
Automated lung segmentation for thoracic CT
Armato, S. G., & Sensakovic, W. F. (2004) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2004.06.005 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- UPPALURI, R., MITSA, T., SONKA, M., HOFFMAN, E. A., & McLENNAN, G.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-07-01
- Volume
- 156
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 248-254
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W1970378963
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantification of Pulmonary Emphysema from Lung Computed Tomography Images. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.9606093
- The paper
- UPPALURI, R., MITSA, T., SONKA, M., HOFFMAN, E. A., & McLENNAN, G. (1997). Quantification of Pulmonary Emphysema from Lung Computed Tomography Images. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.9606093
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.