The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Diagnosis of Mild Emphysema: Correlation of Computed Tomography and Pathology Scores
Abstract
Early and accurate diagnosis of emphysema is said to be invaluable for identification of clinically silent and mild emphysema. Recently, computed tomography (CT) has been much advocated for its efficacy in detailed diagnosis of emphysema, and the results have been compared with the pathology grade of emphysema in resected lung specimens. To assess the ability of high resolution CT scan in detecting and grading mild emphysema, we correlated the high resolution CT scan with the pathology grade of emphysema and the destructive index (DI) of lung specimens from 42 patients undergoing thoracotomy for a solitary pulmonary nodule. The high resolution CT scan and the cut surface of the lung, corresponding exactly to the same plane of the CT scan image, were assessed using the picture-grading system of Thurlbeck and coworkers on a scale of zero to 100. The CT scores for all patients ranged from 12 to 57, with a mean +/- SD of 22.1 +/- 9.6 using 1-mm collimation (n = 35), and from 7 to 46 with a mean +/- SD of 16.5 +/- 8.3 using 5-mm collimation (n = 33). The pathology scores ranged from 10 to 57, with a mean +/- SD of 23.2 +/- 9.8 (n = 42). The DI ranged from 15.4 to 67.1, with a mean +/- SD of 31.4 +/- 10.8 (n = 42). The CT scores using 1-mm and 5-mm collimation correlated significantly with the pathology scores (r = 0.68 and 0.76, respectively, p less than 0.001), and with the DI (r = 0.62 and 0.74, respectively, p less than 0.001). The pathology scores correlated significantly with the DI (r = 0.72, p less than 0.001). We therefore concluded that high resolution CT can help to identify the presence and grading of mild emphysema.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Gross, T. J., & Hunninghake, G. W. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra003200 · Cited by 962
Computed Tomographic Measurements of Airway Dimensions and Emphysema in Smokers
NAKANO, Y., MURO, S., SAKAI, H., HIRAI, T., CHIN, K., TSUKINO, M., NISHIMURA, K., ITOH, H., PARÉ, P. D., HOGG, J. C., et al. (2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.162.3.9907120 · Cited by 695
Quantification of Pulmonary Emphysema from Lung Computed Tomography Images
UPPALURI, R., MITSA, T., SONKA, M., HOFFMAN, E. A., & McLENNAN, G. (1997) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.156.1.9606093 · Cited by 276
Iron Homeostasis in the Lung Following Asbestos Exposure
Ghio, A. J., Stonehuerner, J., Richards, J., & Devlin, R. B. (2008) · Antioxidants & Redox Signaling · doi:10.1089/ars.2007.1909 · Cited by 65
Metadata
- Authors
- Kuwano, K., Matsuba, K., Ikeda, T., Murakami, J., Araki, A., Nishitani, H., Ishida, T., Yasumoto, K., & Shigematsu, N.
- Venue
- American Review of Respiratory Disease
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1990-01
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-178
- ISSN
- 0003-0805 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2024856667
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Diagnosis of Mild Emphysema: Correlation of Computed Tomography and Pathology Scores. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm/141.1.169
- The paper
- Kuwano, K., Matsuba, K., Ikeda, T., Murakami, J., Araki, A., Nishitani, H., Ishida, T., Yasumoto, K., & Shigematsu, N. (1990). The Diagnosis of Mild Emphysema: Correlation of Computed Tomography and Pathology Scores. American Review of Respiratory Disease. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm/141.1.169
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.