Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Implementation of Bronchoscopic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia to Reduce Antibiotic Use

BONTEN, MARC J. M., BERGMANS, DENNIS C. J. J., STOBBERINGH, ELLEN E., van der GEEST, SIEBE, DE LEEUW, PETER W., van TIEL, FRANK H., GAILLARD, CARLO A.·1997·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

In intensive care units, a large proportion of antibiotics are prescribed for presumed episodes of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). VAP is usually diagnosed on a combination of clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic criteria with a high sensitivity but low specificity for VAP. As a result, patients may receive antibiotics unnecessarily. Specificity can be increased by the addition of quantitative cultures of samples of protected specimen brush (PSB) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) to the diagnostic criteria. We prospectively analyzed the effects of implementation of PSB and BAL in the diagnosis of VAP on antibiotic prescription. PSB and/or BAL were performed in patients who fulfilled the clinical, radiographic, and microbiologic criteria for VAP. Based on quantitative cultures of PSB and/or BAL, patients were categorized into three groups: VAP microbiologically proven (Group 1; n = 72); clinical suspicion of VAP not confirmed microbiologically (Group 2; n = 66); and patients in whom bronchoscopy could not be performed (Group 3; n = 17). In Group 1, antibiotic therapy was instituted empirically in 40 patients (56%) (Group 1a) and after obtaining culture results in the other 32 patients (Group lb). Adjustment of therapy, based on culture results, occurred in 14 (35%) patients in Group la. In Group 2 empiric therapy was instituted in 34 (52%) patients (Group 2a) and dIscontinued within 48 h in 17 of them (50%). In Group 3, 17 (100%) patients were treated with antibiotics. Among the 66 patients in whom a clinical suspicion of VAP was not confirmed, only 18 (27%) were treated with antibiotics, and antibiotic therapy was withheld in 48 (35%) of 138 patients who underwent bronchoscopy. Withholding of antibiotic therapy had no negative effect on the recurrence of a clinical suspicion of VAP or on mortality rates. We conclude that addition of bronchoscopic techniques to the criteria for VAP may help to reduce antibiotic use. However, the definite benefits and cost-effectiveness of these techniques should be analyzed in a randomized study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.156.6.9610117

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
BONTEN, M. J. M., BERGMANS, D. C. J. J., STOBBERINGH, E. E., van der GEEST, S., DE LEEUW, P. W., van TIEL, F. H., & GAILLARD, C. A.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1997-12-01
Volume
156
Issue
6
Pages
1820-1824
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2035970838
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
7.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Implementation of Bronchoscopic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia to Reduce Antibiotic Use. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.156.6.9610117
The paper
BONTEN, M. J. M., BERGMANS, D. C. J. J., STOBBERINGH, E. E., van der GEEST, S., DE LEEUW, P. W., van TIEL, F. H., & GAILLARD, C. A. (1997). Implementation of Bronchoscopic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Ventilator-associated Pneumonia to Reduce Antibiotic Use. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.156.6.9610117

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.