Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 324

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

MAZIAK, WASIM, LOUKIDES, STELIOS, CULPITT, SARAH, SULLIVAN, PAUL, KHARITONOV, SERGEI A., BARNES, PETER J.·1998·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive airflow obstruction and a neutrophilic inflammation. Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) may be a marker of disease activity in a variety of lung diseases. We measured exhaled NO in patients with documented COPD and investigated whether the concentration of exhaled NO is related to the severity of disease as defined by lung function. We also investigated whether concentration of exhaled NO was different in COPD patients who received inhaled steroids compared with steroid-naive patients. We studied 13 current smokers with COPD, eight exsmokers with COPD, 12 patients with unstable COPD (exacerbation or severe disease), and 10 smokers with chronic bronchitis without airflow limitation. Exhaled NO levels were significantly higher in patients with unstable COPD (12.7 +/- 1.5 ppb) than in other groups (p < 0.01). Exhaled NO levels were significantly higher in smokers with COPD than in smokers with chronic bronchitis (4.3 +/- 0.5 versus 2.5 +/- 0.5 ppb, p < 0.05), and were even higher in patients with COPD who had stopped smoking (6.3 +/- 0.6 ppb, p < 0.01). Exhaled NO levels showed a significant negative correlation with their lung function assessed by % predicted FEV1 values (r = -0.6, p < 0.001). Exhaled NO levels in patients treated with inhaled steroids were significantly higher compared with steroid-naive patients (8.2 +/- 1.2 ppb versus 5 +/- 0.4 ppb, p < 0.05), but the first group included more severe patients as assessed by lung function. We conclude that exhaled NO could serve as a useful, practical marker for monitoring disease activity in COPD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.97-05009

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • The L-Arginine-Nitric Oxide Pathway

    Epstein, F. H., Moncada, S., & Higgs, A. (1993) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199312303292706 · Cited by 6,678 · cited 1×

    “First, inhibition of endogenous NO production may contribute to reduced mucociliary clearance and bactericidal activity of phagocytes (23, 24 ), thus increasing susceptibility to recurrent respiratory infections, a pattern seen in smokers as well as COPD patients.”
    Background

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 324

Metadata

Authors
MAZIAK, W., LOUKIDES, S., CULPITT, S., SULLIVAN, P., KHARITONOV, S. A., & BARNES, P. J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
157
Issue
3
Pages
998-1002
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2099380423
Cited by
324
References
1
FWCI
18.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.97-05009
The paper
MAZIAK, W., LOUKIDES, S., CULPITT, S., SULLIVAN, P., KHARITONOV, S. A., & BARNES, P. J. (1998). Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.157.3.97-05009

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.