Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 488

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interpretation of Repeated Tuberculin Tests: Boosting, Conversion, and Reversion

MENZIES, DICK·1999·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

The tuberculin skin test is one of the few tests developed in the 19th century that is still in present use in clinical medicine. The first tuberculin test material was prepared by Robert Koch (1); its use for detection of tuberculosis (TB) infection was first described in 1907 by von Pirquet (2). Given such a long history of use, it may seem surprising that aspects of interpretation of this test remain controversial. However, this reflects changes in the populations affected with tuberculosis and their relative frequency of true positive tests from TB infection, and false-positive tests associated with bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccination, or nontuberculous mycobacteria, as well as the recent human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic. Particular problems have arisen with use of repeated tuberculin tests to detect new infection in high-risk populations such as initially tuberculin-negative contacts of active cases, and workers with occupational exposure. This has revealed that tuberculin reactions may decrease in size (reversion) or increase in size because of: ( 1 ) random variability from differences in administration, reading, or biologic response; ( 2 ) immunologic recall of preexisting delayed type hypersensitivity to mycobacterial antigens (boosting); or ( 3 ) new infection (conversion). This review has been undertaken to provide information regarding factors causing changes in the size of repeated tuberculin reactions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9801120

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 488

Metadata

Authors
MENZIES, D.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1999-01-01
Volume
159
Issue
1
Pages
15-21
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2105163700
Cited by
488
References
17
FWCI
8.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretation of Repeated Tuberculin Tests: Boosting, Conversion, and Reversion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9801120
The paper
MENZIES, D. (1999). Interpretation of Repeated Tuberculin Tests: Boosting, Conversion, and Reversion. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9801120

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.