The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Two Interferon-γ Assays and Tuberculin Skin Test for Tracing Tuberculosis Contacts
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The tuberculin skin test (TST) has low specificity. QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) and T-SPOT.TB are based on interferon (IFN)-gamma responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens. A novel in-tube format of QFT-G (QFT-GIT) offers logistical advantages. OBJECTIVE: To compare TST, QFT-GIT, and T-SPOT.TB in bacillus Calmette-Guérin unvaccinated contacts and correlate results with measures of recent exposure. METHODS: When a supermarket employee with smear-positive tuberculosis had infected most close contacts, a contact investigation among more than 20,000 customers was performed. We recruited subjects randomly on the day of TST administration (n = 469) and subjects with TST of more than 0 mm on the day of TST reading (n = 316). QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were performed. Demographic data and measures of exposure were collected. TST results were analyzed at a cutoff of 10 or 15 mm. Blood tests were interpreted following the manufacturers' criteria and by varying cutoff levels. RESULTS: Among 785 study participants, TST results were associated with age, whereas positive IFN-gamma responses were significantly associated with cumulative shopping time, most markedly for QFT-GIT. Among participants with a TST of 15 mm or greater, sensitivity of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB was 42.2 and 51.3%, respectively. Interassay agreement was 89.6% (kappa = 0.59). By varying cutoff values, agreement between the IFN-gamma assays was optimal at 93.6% (kappa = 0.71) using a cutoff of 0.20 IU/ml for QFT-GIT and 13 spots for T-SPOT.TB. CONCLUSIONS: Blood test results were associated with exposure, whereas the TST was not. A possible lack of sensitivity of IFN-gamma assays in detecting individuals with TST of 15 mm or greater, despite negative bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination status, warrants further investigation into alternative cutoff values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2000) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.161.supplement_3.ats600 · Cited by 1,241
Specific immune-based diagnosis of tuberculosis
Andersen, P., Munk, M., Pollock, J., & Doherty, T. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)02742-2 · Cited by 924
Interferon-γ assays in the immunodiagnosis of tuberculosis: a systematic review
Pai, M., Riley, L. W., & Colford, J. M. (2004) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(04)01206-x · Cited by 913
(2005) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e548692006-002 · Cited by 691
Specific Detection of Tuberculosis Infection: An Interferon-γ–based Assay Using New Antigens
Mori, T., Sakatani, M., Yamagishi, F., Takashima, T., Kawabe, Y., Nagao, K., Shigeto, E., Harada, N., Mitarai, S., Okada, M., et al. (2004) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200402-179oc · Cited by 657
Newsom, S. W. B. (2006) · Journal of Hospital Infection · doi:10.1016/j.jhin.2006.06.003 · Cited by 635
Ewer, K., Deeks, J., Alvarez, L., Bryant, G., Waller, S., Andersen, P., Monk, P., & Lalvani, A. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)12950-9 · Cited by 615
Ferrara, G., Losi, M., D'Amico, R., Roversi, P., Piro, R., Meacci, M., Meccugni, B., Dori, I. M., Andreani, A., Bergamini, B. M., et al. (2006) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(06)68579-6 · Cited by 505
Interpretation of Repeated Tuberculin Tests: Boosting, Conversion, and Reversion
MENZIES, D. (1999) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.159.1.9801120 · Cited by 488
Cited by
Mack, U., Migliori, G. B., Sester, M., Rieder, H. L., Ehlers, S., Goletti, D., Bossink, A., Magdorf, K., Hölscher, C., Kampmann, B., et al. (2009) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00120908 · Cited by 591
Self-citationUnderstanding Latent Tuberculosis: A Moving Target
Lin, P. L., & Flynn, J. L. (2010) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0903856 · Cited by 488
Newton, S. M., Brent, A. J., Anderson, S., Whittaker, E., & Kampmann, B. (2008) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(08)70182-8 · Cited by 480
Evidence-Based Comparison of Commercial Interferon-γ Release Assays for Detecting Active TB
Diel, R., Loddenkemper, R., & Nienhaus, A. (2010) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.09-2350 · Cited by 362
Detjen, A. K., Keil, T., Roll, S., Hauer, B., Mauch, H., Wahn, U., & Magdorf, K. (2007) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1086/519266 · Cited by 288
Metadata
- Authors
- Arend, S. M., Thijsen, S. F. T., Leyten, E. M. S., Bouwman, J. J. M., Franken, W. P. J., Koster, B. F. P. J., Cobelens, F. G. J., van Houte, A.-J., & Bossink, A. W. J.
- Venue
- American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-03-15
- Volume
- 175
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 618-627
- ISSN
- 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-4970
- OpenAlex
- W2107614420
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 18.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Two Interferon-γ Assays and Tuberculin Skin Test for Tracing Tuberculosis Contacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200608-1099oc
- The paper
- Arend, S. M., Thijsen, S. F. T., Leyten, E. M. S., Bouwman, J. J. M., Franken, W. P. J., Koster, B. F. P. J., Cobelens, F. G. J., van Houte, A.-J., & Bossink, A. W. J. (2007). Comparison of Two Interferon-γ Assays and Tuberculin Skin Test for Tracing Tuberculosis Contacts. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200608-1099oc
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.