Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 255

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Comparison of Two Interferon-γ Assays and Tuberculin Skin Test for Tracing Tuberculosis Contacts

Arend, Sandra M., Thijsen, Steven F. T., Leyten, Eliane M. S., Bouwman, John J. M., Franken, Willeke P. J., Koster, Ben F. P. J., Cobelens, Frank G. J., van Houte, Arend-Jan, Bossink, Ailko W. J.·2007·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The tuberculin skin test (TST) has low specificity. QuantiFERON-TB Gold (QFT-G) and T-SPOT.TB are based on interferon (IFN)-gamma responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific antigens. A novel in-tube format of QFT-G (QFT-GIT) offers logistical advantages. OBJECTIVE: To compare TST, QFT-GIT, and T-SPOT.TB in bacillus Calmette-Guérin unvaccinated contacts and correlate results with measures of recent exposure. METHODS: When a supermarket employee with smear-positive tuberculosis had infected most close contacts, a contact investigation among more than 20,000 customers was performed. We recruited subjects randomly on the day of TST administration (n = 469) and subjects with TST of more than 0 mm on the day of TST reading (n = 316). QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB were performed. Demographic data and measures of exposure were collected. TST results were analyzed at a cutoff of 10 or 15 mm. Blood tests were interpreted following the manufacturers' criteria and by varying cutoff levels. RESULTS: Among 785 study participants, TST results were associated with age, whereas positive IFN-gamma responses were significantly associated with cumulative shopping time, most markedly for QFT-GIT. Among participants with a TST of 15 mm or greater, sensitivity of QFT-GIT and T-SPOT.TB was 42.2 and 51.3%, respectively. Interassay agreement was 89.6% (kappa = 0.59). By varying cutoff values, agreement between the IFN-gamma assays was optimal at 93.6% (kappa = 0.71) using a cutoff of 0.20 IU/ml for QFT-GIT and 13 spots for T-SPOT.TB. CONCLUSIONS: Blood test results were associated with exposure, whereas the TST was not. A possible lack of sensitivity of IFN-gamma assays in detecting individuals with TST of 15 mm or greater, despite negative bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination status, warrants further investigation into alternative cutoff values.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200608-1099oc

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 255

Metadata

Authors
Arend, S. M., Thijsen, S. F. T., Leyten, E. M. S., Bouwman, J. J. M., Franken, W. P. J., Koster, B. F. P. J., Cobelens, F. G. J., van Houte, A.-J., & Bossink, A. W. J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2007-03-15
Volume
175
Issue
6
Pages
618-627
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2107614420
Cited by
255
References
36
FWCI
18.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Two Interferon-γ Assays and Tuberculin Skin Test for Tracing Tuberculosis Contacts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/rccm.200608-1099oc
The paper
Arend, S. M., Thijsen, S. F. T., Leyten, E. M. S., Bouwman, J. J. M., Franken, W. P. J., Koster, B. F. P. J., Cobelens, F. G. J., van Houte, A.-J., & Bossink, A. W. J. (2007). Comparison of Two Interferon-γ Assays and Tuberculin Skin Test for Tracing Tuberculosis Contacts. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200608-1099oc

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.