Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 445

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rhinovirus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Wheezing Children Requiring Emergency Care: IgE and Eosinophil Analyses

RAKES, GARY P., ARRUDA, EURICO, INGRAM, JIM M., HOOVER, GATES E., ZAMBRANO, JUAN C., HAYDEN, FREDERICK G., PLATTS-MILLS, THOMAS A. E., HEYMANN, PETER W.·1999·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

This cross-sectional emergency department study of 70 wheezing children and 59 control subjects (2 mo to 16 yr of age) examined the prevalence of respiratory viruses and their relationship to age, atopic status, and eosinophil markers. Nasal washes were cultured for respiratory viruses, assayed for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antigen, and tested for coronavirus and rhinovirus RNA using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Also evaluated were eosinophil numbers and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in both nasal washes and serum, along with total IgE and specific IgE antibody in serum. Respiratory viruses were detected in 82% (18 of 22) of wheezing infants younger than 2 yr of age and in 83% (40 of 48) of older wheezing children. The predominant pathogens were RSV in infants (detected in 68% of wheezing subjects) and rhinovirus in older wheezing children (71%), and both were strongly associated with wheezing (p < 0.005). RSV was largely limited to wheezing children younger than 24 mo of age, but rhinovirus was detected by RT-PCR in 41% of all infants and in 35% of nonwheezing control subjects older than 2 yr of age. After 2 yr of age the strongest odds for wheezing were observed among those who had a positive RT-PCR test for rhinovirus together with a positive serum radioallergosorbent testing (RAST), nasal eosinophilia, or elevated nasal ECP (odds ratios = 17, 21, and 25, respectively). Results from this study demonstrate that a large majority of emergent wheezing illnesses during childhood (2 to 16 yr of age) can be linked to infection with rhinovirus, and that these wheezing attacks are most likely in those who have rhinovirus together with evidence of atopy or eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.159.3.9801052

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 445

Metadata

Authors
RAKES, G. P., ARRUDA, E., INGRAM, J. M., HOOVER, G. E., ZAMBRANO, J. C., HAYDEN, F. G., PLATTS-MILLS, T. A. E., & HEYMANN, P. W.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
159
Issue
3
Pages
785-790
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2148710849
Cited by
445
References
4
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rhinovirus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Wheezing Children Requiring Emergency Care: IgE and Eosinophil Analyses. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.159.3.9801052
The paper
RAKES, G. P., ARRUDA, E., INGRAM, J. M., HOOVER, G. E., ZAMBRANO, J. C., HAYDEN, F. G., PLATTS-MILLS, T. A. E., & HEYMANN, P. W. (1999). Rhinovirus and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Wheezing Children Requiring Emergency Care: IgE and Eosinophil Analyses. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.159.3.9801052

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.