Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 780

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How Is Mechanical Ventilation Employed in the Intensive Care Unit?: An International Utilization Review

ESTEBAN, ANDRÉS, ANZUETO, ANTONIO, ALÍA, INMACULADA, GORDO, FEDERICO, APEZTEGUÍA, CARLOS, PÁLIZAS, FERNANDO, CIDE, DAVID, GOLDWASER, ROSANNE, SOTO, LUIS, BUGEDO, GUILLERMO, RODRIGO, CARLOS, PIMENTEL, JORGE, RAIMONDI, GUILLERMO, TOBIN, MARTIN J.·2000·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

A 1-d point-prevalence study was performed with the aim of describing the characteristics of conventional mechanical ventilation in intensive care units ICUs from North America, South America, Spain, and Portugal. The study involved 412 medical-surgical ICUs and 1,638 patients receiving mechanical ventilation at the moment of the study. The main outcome measures were characterization of the indications for initiation of mechanical ventilation, the artificial airways used to deliver mechanical ventilation, the ventilator modes and settings, and the methods of weaning. The median age of the study patients was 61 yr, and the median duration of mechanical ventilation at the time of the study was 7 d. Common indications for the initiation of mechanical ventilation included acute respiratory failure (66%), acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (13%), coma (10%), and neuromuscular disorders (10%). Mechanical ventilation was delivered via an endotracheal tube in 75% of patients, a tracheostomy in 24%, and a facial mask in 1%. Ventilator modes consisted of assist/control ventilation in 47% of patients and 46% were ventilated with synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation, pressure support, or the combination of both. The median tidal volume setting was 9 ml/kg in patients receiving assist/control and the median setting of pressure support was 18 cm H(2)O. Positive end-expiratory pressure was not employed in 31% of patients. Method of weaning varied considerably from country to country, and even within a country several methods were in use. We conclude that the primary indications for mechanical ventilation and the ventilator settings were remarkably similar across countries, but the selection of modes of mechanical ventilation and methods of weaning varied considerably from country to country.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9902018

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 780

Metadata

Authors
ESTEBAN, A., ANZUETO, A., ALÍA, I., GORDO, F., APEZTEGUÍA, C., PÁLIZAS, F., CIDE, D., GOLDWASER, R., SOTO, L., BUGEDO, G., RODRIGO, C., PIMENTEL, J., RAIMONDI, G., & TOBIN, M. J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2000-05-01
Volume
161
Issue
5
Pages
1450-1458
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1903005360
Cited by
780
References
3
FWCI
21.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Is Mechanical Ventilation Employed in the Intensive Care Unit?: An International Utilization Review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9902018
The paper
ESTEBAN, A., ANZUETO, A., ALÍA, I., GORDO, F., APEZTEGUÍA, C., PÁLIZAS, F., CIDE, D., GOLDWASER, R., SOTO, L., BUGEDO, G., RODRIGO, C., PIMENTEL, J., RAIMONDI, G., & TOBIN, M. J. (2000). How Is Mechanical Ventilation Employed in the Intensive Care Unit?: An International Utilization Review. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.161.5.9902018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.