Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Multicenter Prospective Study of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia During Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Incidence, Prognosis, and Risk Factors

MARKOWICZ, PHILIPPE, WOLFF, MICHEL, DJEDAÏNI, KAMEL, COHEN, YVES, CHASTRE, JEAN, DELCLAUX, CHRISTOPHE, MERRER, JACQUES, HERMAN, BERNARD, VEBER, BENOIT, FONTAINE, ALAIN, DREYFUSS, DIDIER, the ARDS Study Group·2000·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

We investigated the incidence, risk factors for, and outcome of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We compared 134 patients with ARDS with 744 patients without ARDS on mechanical ventilation. Fiberoptic bronchoscopic examination and quantitative bacterial cultures (protected brush or catheter sampling [threshold: 10(3) cfu/ml], or bronchoalveolar lavage [threshold: 10(4) cfu/ml]) were used to diagnose pneumonia. VAP occurred in 49 patients (36.5%). The incidence of pneumonia was 23% (173 of 744 patients) among patients without ARDS (p < 0.002). Nonfermenting gram-negative rods caused significantly more pneumonia in ARDS patients. Mortality rates were identical in ARDS patients with (28 of 49 patients, 57%) and without (50 of 85 patients, 59%) pulmonary infection (p = 0.8). VAP resulted in a considerable increase in attributable time on mechanical ventilation of both the overall population of ARDS patients and of survivors. Both the use of sucralfate (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 4. 42; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.01 to 9.7, p = 0.0002) and the duration of exposure to sucralfate (adjusted OR: 1.206; 95% CI: 1. 095 to 1.328, p = 0.0002) were associated with an increased risk of VAP during ARDS. VAP considerably prolongs the time on mechanical ventilation without affecting survival. Patients given sucralfate may be at greater risk of developing pulmonary infection during ARDS.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.161.6.9909122

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
MARKOWICZ, P., WOLFF, M., DJEDAÏNI, K., COHEN, Y., CHASTRE, J., DELCLAUX, C., MERRER, J., HERMAN, B., VEBER, B., FONTAINE, A., DREYFUSS, D., & the ARDS Study Group
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2000-06-01
Volume
161
Issue
6
Pages
1942-1948
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2136140396
Cited by
230
References
2
FWCI
10.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multicenter Prospective Study of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia During Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Incidence, Prognosis, and Risk Factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.161.6.9909122
The paper
MARKOWICZ, P., WOLFF, M., DJEDAÏNI, K., COHEN, Y., CHASTRE, J., DELCLAUX, C., MERRER, J., HERMAN, B., VEBER, B., FONTAINE, A., DREYFUSS, D., & the ARDS Study Group. (2000). Multicenter Prospective Study of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia During Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Incidence, Prognosis, and Risk Factors. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.161.6.9909122

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.