Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,441

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion of Treprostinil, a Prostacyclin Analogue, in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial

SIMONNEAU, GERALD, BARST, ROBYN J., GALIE, NAZZARENO, NAEIJE, ROBERT, RICH, STUART, BOURGE, ROBERT C., KEOGH, ANNE, OUDIZ, RONALD, FROST, ADAANI, BLACKBURN, SHELMER D., CROW, JAMES W., RUBIN, LEWIS J.·2002·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a life-threatening disease for which continuous intravenous prostacyclin has proven to be effective. However, this treatment requires a permanent central venous catheter with the associated risk of serious complications such as sepsis, thromboembolism, or syncope. Treprostinil, a stable prostacyclin analogue, can be administered by a continuous subcutaneous infusion, avoiding these risks. We conducted a 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter trial in 470 patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension, either primary or associated with connective tissue disease or congenital systemic-to-pulmonary shunts. Exercise capacity improved with treprostinil and was unchanged with placebo; the between treatment group difference in median six-minute walking distance was 16 m (p = 0.006). Improvement in exercise capacity was greater in the sicker patients and was dose-related, but independent of disease etiology. Concomitantly, treprostinil significantly improved indices of dyspnea, signs and symptoms of pulmonary hypertension, and hemodynamics. The most common side effect attributed to treprostinil was infusion site pain (85%) leading to premature discontinuation from the study in 8% of patients. Three patients in the treprostinil treatment group presented with an episode of gastrointestinal hemorrhage. We conclude that chronic subcutaneous infusion of treprostinil is an effective treatment with an acceptable safety profile in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/ajrccm.165.6.2106079

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,441

Metadata

Authors
SIMONNEAU, G., BARST, R. J., GALIE, N., NAEIJE, R., RICH, S., BOURGE, R. C., KEOGH, A., OUDIZ, R., FROST, A., BLACKBURN, S. D., CROW, J. W., & RUBIN, L. J.
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2002-03-15
Volume
165
Issue
6
Pages
800-804
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W1840736932
Cited by
1,441
References
0
FWCI
63.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion of Treprostinil, a Prostacyclin Analogue, in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1164/ajrccm.165.6.2106079
The paper
SIMONNEAU, G., BARST, R. J., GALIE, N., NAEIJE, R., RICH, S., BOURGE, R. C., KEOGH, A., OUDIZ, R., FROST, A., BLACKBURN, S. D., CROW, J. W., & RUBIN, L. J. (2002). Continuous Subcutaneous Infusion of Treprostinil, a Prostacyclin Analogue, in Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: A Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Trial. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.165.6.2106079

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.